Serum lutein response is greater from free lutein than from esterified lutein during 4 weeks of supplementation in healthy adults

Edward P. Norkus, Katherine L. Norkus, Thiruvinvamalai S. Dharmarajan, Joseph Schierle, Wolfgang Schalch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Current data suggest great variability in serum response following lutein ingestion from various sources. Objective: To compare the relative serum response during supplementation with free lutein (fL) and lutein esters (Le). Methods: 72 volunteers (23-52 years; body mass index [BMI] >20 and <30 kg/m2; baseline serum lutein, <20 μg/dL [<352 nmol/L]) were identified. Subjects, matched for gender, age, and BMI, were randomly assigned to the fL or Le group. fL and Le capsules contained 12.2 mg of free lutein or 27 mg of lutein ester (equivalent to 13.5 mg free lutein), respectively. Fasting blood was obtained at baseline and after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of supplementation. Supplements were consumed with standard portions of dry, ready-to-eat cereal and 2% cow's milk. Results: Absolute changes in serum lutein, per mg daily dose, were significantly greater in fL vs. Le after 21 days (p = 0.0012) and remained so after 28 days (p = 0.0011) of supplementation. Serum lutein Area Under the Curve [AUC(day 0-28)] response was 17% greater for fL vs. Le (p 5 0.0187). Regression models were used and determined that (1) baseline serum lutein levels and (2) the form of lutein ingested (fL > Le) influence the serum lutein response during supplementation, while subject age, gender, BMI, and serum lipids do not affect serum response. Conclusions: These results suggest that the relative serum lutein response will be significantly greater from supplements containing free lutein than from supplements containing lutein esters. These findings should be useful for future clinical trials exploring the effectiveness of lutein supplementation in the prevention of or protection against age-related macular degeneration and/or cataracts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)575-585
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American College of Nutrition
Volume29
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lutein
Serum
Esters
Body Mass Index
Macular Degeneration
Cataract
Volunteers
Eating
Clinical Trials
Lipids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Serum lutein response is greater from free lutein than from esterified lutein during 4 weeks of supplementation in healthy adults. / Norkus, Edward P.; Norkus, Katherine L.; Dharmarajan, Thiruvinvamalai S.; Schierle, Joseph; Schalch, Wolfgang.

In: Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2010, p. 575-585.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9805a2251afe433b975ccdd06f73cc08,
title = "Serum lutein response is greater from free lutein than from esterified lutein during 4 weeks of supplementation in healthy adults",
abstract = "Background: Current data suggest great variability in serum response following lutein ingestion from various sources. Objective: To compare the relative serum response during supplementation with free lutein (fL) and lutein esters (Le). Methods: 72 volunteers (23-52 years; body mass index [BMI] >20 and <30 kg/m2; baseline serum lutein, <20 μg/dL [<352 nmol/L]) were identified. Subjects, matched for gender, age, and BMI, were randomly assigned to the fL or Le group. fL and Le capsules contained 12.2 mg of free lutein or 27 mg of lutein ester (equivalent to 13.5 mg free lutein), respectively. Fasting blood was obtained at baseline and after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of supplementation. Supplements were consumed with standard portions of dry, ready-to-eat cereal and 2{\%} cow's milk. Results: Absolute changes in serum lutein, per mg daily dose, were significantly greater in fL vs. Le after 21 days (p = 0.0012) and remained so after 28 days (p = 0.0011) of supplementation. Serum lutein Area Under the Curve [AUC(day 0-28)] response was 17{\%} greater for fL vs. Le (p 5 0.0187). Regression models were used and determined that (1) baseline serum lutein levels and (2) the form of lutein ingested (fL > Le) influence the serum lutein response during supplementation, while subject age, gender, BMI, and serum lipids do not affect serum response. Conclusions: These results suggest that the relative serum lutein response will be significantly greater from supplements containing free lutein than from supplements containing lutein esters. These findings should be useful for future clinical trials exploring the effectiveness of lutein supplementation in the prevention of or protection against age-related macular degeneration and/or cataracts.",
author = "Norkus, {Edward P.} and Norkus, {Katherine L.} and Dharmarajan, {Thiruvinvamalai S.} and Joseph Schierle and Wolfgang Schalch",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "575--585",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Nutrition",
issn = "0731-5724",
publisher = "American College Of Nutrition",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Serum lutein response is greater from free lutein than from esterified lutein during 4 weeks of supplementation in healthy adults

AU - Norkus, Edward P.

AU - Norkus, Katherine L.

AU - Dharmarajan, Thiruvinvamalai S.

AU - Schierle, Joseph

AU - Schalch, Wolfgang

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Background: Current data suggest great variability in serum response following lutein ingestion from various sources. Objective: To compare the relative serum response during supplementation with free lutein (fL) and lutein esters (Le). Methods: 72 volunteers (23-52 years; body mass index [BMI] >20 and <30 kg/m2; baseline serum lutein, <20 μg/dL [<352 nmol/L]) were identified. Subjects, matched for gender, age, and BMI, were randomly assigned to the fL or Le group. fL and Le capsules contained 12.2 mg of free lutein or 27 mg of lutein ester (equivalent to 13.5 mg free lutein), respectively. Fasting blood was obtained at baseline and after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of supplementation. Supplements were consumed with standard portions of dry, ready-to-eat cereal and 2% cow's milk. Results: Absolute changes in serum lutein, per mg daily dose, were significantly greater in fL vs. Le after 21 days (p = 0.0012) and remained so after 28 days (p = 0.0011) of supplementation. Serum lutein Area Under the Curve [AUC(day 0-28)] response was 17% greater for fL vs. Le (p 5 0.0187). Regression models were used and determined that (1) baseline serum lutein levels and (2) the form of lutein ingested (fL > Le) influence the serum lutein response during supplementation, while subject age, gender, BMI, and serum lipids do not affect serum response. Conclusions: These results suggest that the relative serum lutein response will be significantly greater from supplements containing free lutein than from supplements containing lutein esters. These findings should be useful for future clinical trials exploring the effectiveness of lutein supplementation in the prevention of or protection against age-related macular degeneration and/or cataracts.

AB - Background: Current data suggest great variability in serum response following lutein ingestion from various sources. Objective: To compare the relative serum response during supplementation with free lutein (fL) and lutein esters (Le). Methods: 72 volunteers (23-52 years; body mass index [BMI] >20 and <30 kg/m2; baseline serum lutein, <20 μg/dL [<352 nmol/L]) were identified. Subjects, matched for gender, age, and BMI, were randomly assigned to the fL or Le group. fL and Le capsules contained 12.2 mg of free lutein or 27 mg of lutein ester (equivalent to 13.5 mg free lutein), respectively. Fasting blood was obtained at baseline and after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of supplementation. Supplements were consumed with standard portions of dry, ready-to-eat cereal and 2% cow's milk. Results: Absolute changes in serum lutein, per mg daily dose, were significantly greater in fL vs. Le after 21 days (p = 0.0012) and remained so after 28 days (p = 0.0011) of supplementation. Serum lutein Area Under the Curve [AUC(day 0-28)] response was 17% greater for fL vs. Le (p 5 0.0187). Regression models were used and determined that (1) baseline serum lutein levels and (2) the form of lutein ingested (fL > Le) influence the serum lutein response during supplementation, while subject age, gender, BMI, and serum lipids do not affect serum response. Conclusions: These results suggest that the relative serum lutein response will be significantly greater from supplements containing free lutein than from supplements containing lutein esters. These findings should be useful for future clinical trials exploring the effectiveness of lutein supplementation in the prevention of or protection against age-related macular degeneration and/or cataracts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054062088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054062088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21677121

AN - SCOPUS:80054062088

VL - 29

SP - 575

EP - 585

JO - Journal of the American College of Nutrition

JF - Journal of the American College of Nutrition

SN - 0731-5724

IS - 6

ER -