Sensitivity and test-retest reliability of the international shopping list test in assessing verbal learning and memory in mild alzheimer's disease

Taísia A C Thompson, Peter H. Wilson, Peter J. Snyder, Robert H. Pietrzak, David Darby, Paul Maruff, Herman Buschke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The International Shopping List Test (ISLT) was developed specifically to assess verbal list learning and memory in people from different language and cultural backgrounds. In this paper, we describe three studies that examined the sensitivity and reliability of the ISLT in assessing verbal list learning and memory impairment in English-speaking people with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and evaluated whether measures of retention-weighted recall (RWR) provided greater sensitivity and/or reliability relative to conventional list learning performance measures (e.g., free recall). In Study 1, we compared ISLT performance between patients with AD and matched controls and found that AD patients showed a large magnitude impairment on all ISLT performance measures (Cohen's d values >2). The RWR measure was more sensitive to detecting AD-related impairment than the free recall measure for Trial 1, although the most sensitive measures of the ISLT were free recall from Trial 3 and delayed recall. In Study 2, we compared RWR and free recall measures between 10- and 12-word versions of the ISLT, but found no difference between performance measures for the different list lengths. In Study 3, we evaluated test-retest reliabilities of the different outcome measures derived from the ISLT and found that measures of free recall had higher reliabilities than the RWR measures. Taken together, results of these studies suggest that measures of total free recall during learning trials and delayed recall from the 12-word version of the ISLT provide the greatest sensitivity to detecting verbal list learning and memory impairment in AD and that this task shows good test-retest reliability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)412-424
Number of pages13
JournalArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Verbal Learning
Reproducibility of Results
Alzheimer Disease
Learning
Language
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Retention (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Cross-cultural/minority
  • Learning and memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Sensitivity and test-retest reliability of the international shopping list test in assessing verbal learning and memory in mild alzheimer's disease. / Thompson, Taísia A C; Wilson, Peter H.; Snyder, Peter J.; Pietrzak, Robert H.; Darby, David; Maruff, Paul; Buschke, Herman.

In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 26, No. 5, 08.2011, p. 412-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thompson, Taísia A C ; Wilson, Peter H. ; Snyder, Peter J. ; Pietrzak, Robert H. ; Darby, David ; Maruff, Paul ; Buschke, Herman. / Sensitivity and test-retest reliability of the international shopping list test in assessing verbal learning and memory in mild alzheimer's disease. In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2011 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 412-424.
@article{e56155950f2244979a9c0d1e947633cb,
title = "Sensitivity and test-retest reliability of the international shopping list test in assessing verbal learning and memory in mild alzheimer's disease",
abstract = "The International Shopping List Test (ISLT) was developed specifically to assess verbal list learning and memory in people from different language and cultural backgrounds. In this paper, we describe three studies that examined the sensitivity and reliability of the ISLT in assessing verbal list learning and memory impairment in English-speaking people with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and evaluated whether measures of retention-weighted recall (RWR) provided greater sensitivity and/or reliability relative to conventional list learning performance measures (e.g., free recall). In Study 1, we compared ISLT performance between patients with AD and matched controls and found that AD patients showed a large magnitude impairment on all ISLT performance measures (Cohen's d values >2). The RWR measure was more sensitive to detecting AD-related impairment than the free recall measure for Trial 1, although the most sensitive measures of the ISLT were free recall from Trial 3 and delayed recall. In Study 2, we compared RWR and free recall measures between 10- and 12-word versions of the ISLT, but found no difference between performance measures for the different list lengths. In Study 3, we evaluated test-retest reliabilities of the different outcome measures derived from the ISLT and found that measures of free recall had higher reliabilities than the RWR measures. Taken together, results of these studies suggest that measures of total free recall during learning trials and delayed recall from the 12-word version of the ISLT provide the greatest sensitivity to detecting verbal list learning and memory impairment in AD and that this task shows good test-retest reliability.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, Cross-cultural/minority, Learning and memory",
author = "Thompson, {Ta{\'i}sia A C} and Wilson, {Peter H.} and Snyder, {Peter J.} and Pietrzak, {Robert H.} and David Darby and Paul Maruff and Herman Buschke",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1093/arclin/acr039",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "412--424",
journal = "Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology",
issn = "1873-5843",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity and test-retest reliability of the international shopping list test in assessing verbal learning and memory in mild alzheimer's disease

AU - Thompson, Taísia A C

AU - Wilson, Peter H.

AU - Snyder, Peter J.

AU - Pietrzak, Robert H.

AU - Darby, David

AU - Maruff, Paul

AU - Buschke, Herman

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - The International Shopping List Test (ISLT) was developed specifically to assess verbal list learning and memory in people from different language and cultural backgrounds. In this paper, we describe three studies that examined the sensitivity and reliability of the ISLT in assessing verbal list learning and memory impairment in English-speaking people with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and evaluated whether measures of retention-weighted recall (RWR) provided greater sensitivity and/or reliability relative to conventional list learning performance measures (e.g., free recall). In Study 1, we compared ISLT performance between patients with AD and matched controls and found that AD patients showed a large magnitude impairment on all ISLT performance measures (Cohen's d values >2). The RWR measure was more sensitive to detecting AD-related impairment than the free recall measure for Trial 1, although the most sensitive measures of the ISLT were free recall from Trial 3 and delayed recall. In Study 2, we compared RWR and free recall measures between 10- and 12-word versions of the ISLT, but found no difference between performance measures for the different list lengths. In Study 3, we evaluated test-retest reliabilities of the different outcome measures derived from the ISLT and found that measures of free recall had higher reliabilities than the RWR measures. Taken together, results of these studies suggest that measures of total free recall during learning trials and delayed recall from the 12-word version of the ISLT provide the greatest sensitivity to detecting verbal list learning and memory impairment in AD and that this task shows good test-retest reliability.

AB - The International Shopping List Test (ISLT) was developed specifically to assess verbal list learning and memory in people from different language and cultural backgrounds. In this paper, we describe three studies that examined the sensitivity and reliability of the ISLT in assessing verbal list learning and memory impairment in English-speaking people with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and evaluated whether measures of retention-weighted recall (RWR) provided greater sensitivity and/or reliability relative to conventional list learning performance measures (e.g., free recall). In Study 1, we compared ISLT performance between patients with AD and matched controls and found that AD patients showed a large magnitude impairment on all ISLT performance measures (Cohen's d values >2). The RWR measure was more sensitive to detecting AD-related impairment than the free recall measure for Trial 1, although the most sensitive measures of the ISLT were free recall from Trial 3 and delayed recall. In Study 2, we compared RWR and free recall measures between 10- and 12-word versions of the ISLT, but found no difference between performance measures for the different list lengths. In Study 3, we evaluated test-retest reliabilities of the different outcome measures derived from the ISLT and found that measures of free recall had higher reliabilities than the RWR measures. Taken together, results of these studies suggest that measures of total free recall during learning trials and delayed recall from the 12-word version of the ISLT provide the greatest sensitivity to detecting verbal list learning and memory impairment in AD and that this task shows good test-retest reliability.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - Cross-cultural/minority

KW - Learning and memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052001349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052001349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/arclin/acr039

DO - 10.1093/arclin/acr039

M3 - Article

C2 - 21613302

AN - SCOPUS:80052001349

VL - 26

SP - 412

EP - 424

JO - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

JF - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

SN - 1873-5843

IS - 5

ER -