Scaling of weight for height in relation to risk of cancer at different sites in a cohort of Canadian women

Geoffrey C. Kabat, Moonseong Heo, Anthony B. Miller, Thomas E. Rohan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many studies have examined the associations of body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) with risk of various cancers. However, optimal scaling of weight for height may depend on the population studied. The authors used data from a large cohort study of women (Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study, 1980-2000; n = 89,835) to examine how the scaling of weight for height (W/Hx) influenced the association with risk of 19 different cancers. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio for each cancer site with W/Hx, with x increasing from 0 to 3.0 by increments of 0.1. The correlation between weight and W/Hx decreased monotonically with increasing x, whereas W/Hx was minimally correlated with height when x = 1.4. W/Hx showed significant positive associations with postmenopausal breast cancer, endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, and lung cancer in never smokers. W/Hx was inversely associated with lung cancer in ever smokers. The value of x for which W/H x produced the largest statistically significant hazard ratio ranged from 0.8 (endometrial cancer) to 1.7 (postmenopausal breast cancer). For lung cancer in ever smokers, the inverse association was statistically significant for all values of x. These findings suggest that the scaling of weight for height may vary depending on the cancer site and that optimal scaling may be considerably different from W/H2 or, alternatively, that a range of scaling should be considered when examining the association of body weight with risk of disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-101
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume177
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Lung Neoplasms
Weights and Measures
Kidney Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Endometrial Neoplasms
Breast Neoplasms
Early Detection of Cancer
Proportional Hazards Models
Body Mass Index
Cohort Studies
Body Weight
Population

Keywords

  • adiposity
  • body mass index
  • cancer
  • cohort studies
  • scaling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Scaling of weight for height in relation to risk of cancer at different sites in a cohort of Canadian women. / Kabat, Geoffrey C.; Heo, Moonseong; Miller, Anthony B.; Rohan, Thomas E.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 177, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 93-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07749e1c52f84cc5b67d2f9ce9b52e97,
title = "Scaling of weight for height in relation to risk of cancer at different sites in a cohort of Canadian women",
abstract = "Many studies have examined the associations of body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) with risk of various cancers. However, optimal scaling of weight for height may depend on the population studied. The authors used data from a large cohort study of women (Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study, 1980-2000; n = 89,835) to examine how the scaling of weight for height (W/Hx) influenced the association with risk of 19 different cancers. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio for each cancer site with W/Hx, with x increasing from 0 to 3.0 by increments of 0.1. The correlation between weight and W/Hx decreased monotonically with increasing x, whereas W/Hx was minimally correlated with height when x = 1.4. W/Hx showed significant positive associations with postmenopausal breast cancer, endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, and lung cancer in never smokers. W/Hx was inversely associated with lung cancer in ever smokers. The value of x for which W/H x produced the largest statistically significant hazard ratio ranged from 0.8 (endometrial cancer) to 1.7 (postmenopausal breast cancer). For lung cancer in ever smokers, the inverse association was statistically significant for all values of x. These findings suggest that the scaling of weight for height may vary depending on the cancer site and that optimal scaling may be considerably different from W/H2 or, alternatively, that a range of scaling should be considered when examining the association of body weight with risk of disease.",
keywords = "adiposity, body mass index, cancer, cohort studies, scaling",
author = "Kabat, {Geoffrey C.} and Moonseong Heo and Miller, {Anthony B.} and Rohan, {Thomas E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kws270",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "177",
pages = "93--101",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaling of weight for height in relation to risk of cancer at different sites in a cohort of Canadian women

AU - Kabat, Geoffrey C.

AU - Heo, Moonseong

AU - Miller, Anthony B.

AU - Rohan, Thomas E.

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Many studies have examined the associations of body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) with risk of various cancers. However, optimal scaling of weight for height may depend on the population studied. The authors used data from a large cohort study of women (Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study, 1980-2000; n = 89,835) to examine how the scaling of weight for height (W/Hx) influenced the association with risk of 19 different cancers. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio for each cancer site with W/Hx, with x increasing from 0 to 3.0 by increments of 0.1. The correlation between weight and W/Hx decreased monotonically with increasing x, whereas W/Hx was minimally correlated with height when x = 1.4. W/Hx showed significant positive associations with postmenopausal breast cancer, endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, and lung cancer in never smokers. W/Hx was inversely associated with lung cancer in ever smokers. The value of x for which W/H x produced the largest statistically significant hazard ratio ranged from 0.8 (endometrial cancer) to 1.7 (postmenopausal breast cancer). For lung cancer in ever smokers, the inverse association was statistically significant for all values of x. These findings suggest that the scaling of weight for height may vary depending on the cancer site and that optimal scaling may be considerably different from W/H2 or, alternatively, that a range of scaling should be considered when examining the association of body weight with risk of disease.

AB - Many studies have examined the associations of body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) with risk of various cancers. However, optimal scaling of weight for height may depend on the population studied. The authors used data from a large cohort study of women (Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study, 1980-2000; n = 89,835) to examine how the scaling of weight for height (W/Hx) influenced the association with risk of 19 different cancers. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio for each cancer site with W/Hx, with x increasing from 0 to 3.0 by increments of 0.1. The correlation between weight and W/Hx decreased monotonically with increasing x, whereas W/Hx was minimally correlated with height when x = 1.4. W/Hx showed significant positive associations with postmenopausal breast cancer, endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, and lung cancer in never smokers. W/Hx was inversely associated with lung cancer in ever smokers. The value of x for which W/H x produced the largest statistically significant hazard ratio ranged from 0.8 (endometrial cancer) to 1.7 (postmenopausal breast cancer). For lung cancer in ever smokers, the inverse association was statistically significant for all values of x. These findings suggest that the scaling of weight for height may vary depending on the cancer site and that optimal scaling may be considerably different from W/H2 or, alternatively, that a range of scaling should be considered when examining the association of body weight with risk of disease.

KW - adiposity

KW - body mass index

KW - cancer

KW - cohort studies

KW - scaling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871744816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871744816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kws270

DO - 10.1093/aje/kws270

M3 - Article

VL - 177

SP - 93

EP - 101

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 1

ER -