Safety and effectiveness of placement of pacemaker and defibrillator leads in the axillary vein guided by contrast venography

Brian C.M. Ramza, Lawrence Rosenthal, Richard Hui, Emmanuel Nsah, Scott Savader, John H. Lawrence, Gordon F. Tomaselli, Ronald Berger, Jeffrey Brinker, Hugh Calkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite evidence of an increased incidence of lead fracture, the infraclavicular subclavian approach remains the dominant approach for placement of pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads. Although this complication can be prevented by lead placement in the cephalic vein or by recently described approaches for lead placement in the axillary vein, these approaches have not gained widespread acceptance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safely and efficacy of an alternative technique for lead placement that uses contrast-guided venipuncture of the axillary vein with a 5Fr micropuncture introducer set. A total of 50 patients underwent an attempt at placement of pacemaker or implantable defibrillator leads via the axillary vein using this new technique. Patients were randomized into 2 groups based on whether the initial attempt at axillary vein access was performed medina or lateral to the rib cage margin. Lead placement was successfully accomplished in 49 of the 50 patients using this technique. Initial success was achieved in each of 25 patients randomized to the medial approach compared with 18 of 24 patients randomized to the lateral approach to the axillary vein (75%). In each of the 6 patients in whom the initial technique failed, lead placement was subsequently achieved with the medial approach. In addition to a higher initial success rate, the medial approach was determined to be preferable as evidenced by a shorter lead placement time, a smaller number of contrast injections, and a reduced requirement for additional micropuncture guidewires. There were no major complications associated with either approach. Contrast-guided vetopuncture of the axillary vein is a safe and effective approach to placement of endocardial leads.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)892-896
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume80
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Axillary Vein
Defibrillators
Phlebography
Safety
Implantable Defibrillators
Punctures
Phlebotomy
Lead
Veins
Head
Injections
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Safety and effectiveness of placement of pacemaker and defibrillator leads in the axillary vein guided by contrast venography. / Ramza, Brian C.M.; Rosenthal, Lawrence; Hui, Richard; Nsah, Emmanuel; Savader, Scott; Lawrence, John H.; Tomaselli, Gordon F.; Berger, Ronald; Brinker, Jeffrey; Calkins, Hugh.

In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 80, No. 7, 01.10.1997, p. 892-896.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramza, BCM, Rosenthal, L, Hui, R, Nsah, E, Savader, S, Lawrence, JH, Tomaselli, GF, Berger, R, Brinker, J & Calkins, H 1997, 'Safety and effectiveness of placement of pacemaker and defibrillator leads in the axillary vein guided by contrast venography', American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 892-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00542-0
Ramza, Brian C.M. ; Rosenthal, Lawrence ; Hui, Richard ; Nsah, Emmanuel ; Savader, Scott ; Lawrence, John H. ; Tomaselli, Gordon F. ; Berger, Ronald ; Brinker, Jeffrey ; Calkins, Hugh. / Safety and effectiveness of placement of pacemaker and defibrillator leads in the axillary vein guided by contrast venography. In: American Journal of Cardiology. 1997 ; Vol. 80, No. 7. pp. 892-896.
@article{552c84dac2c8437c8d5be6fb7b59e8da,
title = "Safety and effectiveness of placement of pacemaker and defibrillator leads in the axillary vein guided by contrast venography",
abstract = "Despite evidence of an increased incidence of lead fracture, the infraclavicular subclavian approach remains the dominant approach for placement of pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads. Although this complication can be prevented by lead placement in the cephalic vein or by recently described approaches for lead placement in the axillary vein, these approaches have not gained widespread acceptance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safely and efficacy of an alternative technique for lead placement that uses contrast-guided venipuncture of the axillary vein with a 5Fr micropuncture introducer set. A total of 50 patients underwent an attempt at placement of pacemaker or implantable defibrillator leads via the axillary vein using this new technique. Patients were randomized into 2 groups based on whether the initial attempt at axillary vein access was performed medina or lateral to the rib cage margin. Lead placement was successfully accomplished in 49 of the 50 patients using this technique. Initial success was achieved in each of 25 patients randomized to the medial approach compared with 18 of 24 patients randomized to the lateral approach to the axillary vein (75{\%}). In each of the 6 patients in whom the initial technique failed, lead placement was subsequently achieved with the medial approach. In addition to a higher initial success rate, the medial approach was determined to be preferable as evidenced by a shorter lead placement time, a smaller number of contrast injections, and a reduced requirement for additional micropuncture guidewires. There were no major complications associated with either approach. Contrast-guided vetopuncture of the axillary vein is a safe and effective approach to placement of endocardial leads.",
author = "Ramza, {Brian C.M.} and Lawrence Rosenthal and Richard Hui and Emmanuel Nsah and Scott Savader and Lawrence, {John H.} and Tomaselli, {Gordon F.} and Ronald Berger and Jeffrey Brinker and Hugh Calkins",
year = "1997",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00542-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "892--896",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety and effectiveness of placement of pacemaker and defibrillator leads in the axillary vein guided by contrast venography

AU - Ramza, Brian C.M.

AU - Rosenthal, Lawrence

AU - Hui, Richard

AU - Nsah, Emmanuel

AU - Savader, Scott

AU - Lawrence, John H.

AU - Tomaselli, Gordon F.

AU - Berger, Ronald

AU - Brinker, Jeffrey

AU - Calkins, Hugh

PY - 1997/10/1

Y1 - 1997/10/1

N2 - Despite evidence of an increased incidence of lead fracture, the infraclavicular subclavian approach remains the dominant approach for placement of pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads. Although this complication can be prevented by lead placement in the cephalic vein or by recently described approaches for lead placement in the axillary vein, these approaches have not gained widespread acceptance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safely and efficacy of an alternative technique for lead placement that uses contrast-guided venipuncture of the axillary vein with a 5Fr micropuncture introducer set. A total of 50 patients underwent an attempt at placement of pacemaker or implantable defibrillator leads via the axillary vein using this new technique. Patients were randomized into 2 groups based on whether the initial attempt at axillary vein access was performed medina or lateral to the rib cage margin. Lead placement was successfully accomplished in 49 of the 50 patients using this technique. Initial success was achieved in each of 25 patients randomized to the medial approach compared with 18 of 24 patients randomized to the lateral approach to the axillary vein (75%). In each of the 6 patients in whom the initial technique failed, lead placement was subsequently achieved with the medial approach. In addition to a higher initial success rate, the medial approach was determined to be preferable as evidenced by a shorter lead placement time, a smaller number of contrast injections, and a reduced requirement for additional micropuncture guidewires. There were no major complications associated with either approach. Contrast-guided vetopuncture of the axillary vein is a safe and effective approach to placement of endocardial leads.

AB - Despite evidence of an increased incidence of lead fracture, the infraclavicular subclavian approach remains the dominant approach for placement of pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads. Although this complication can be prevented by lead placement in the cephalic vein or by recently described approaches for lead placement in the axillary vein, these approaches have not gained widespread acceptance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safely and efficacy of an alternative technique for lead placement that uses contrast-guided venipuncture of the axillary vein with a 5Fr micropuncture introducer set. A total of 50 patients underwent an attempt at placement of pacemaker or implantable defibrillator leads via the axillary vein using this new technique. Patients were randomized into 2 groups based on whether the initial attempt at axillary vein access was performed medina or lateral to the rib cage margin. Lead placement was successfully accomplished in 49 of the 50 patients using this technique. Initial success was achieved in each of 25 patients randomized to the medial approach compared with 18 of 24 patients randomized to the lateral approach to the axillary vein (75%). In each of the 6 patients in whom the initial technique failed, lead placement was subsequently achieved with the medial approach. In addition to a higher initial success rate, the medial approach was determined to be preferable as evidenced by a shorter lead placement time, a smaller number of contrast injections, and a reduced requirement for additional micropuncture guidewires. There were no major complications associated with either approach. Contrast-guided vetopuncture of the axillary vein is a safe and effective approach to placement of endocardial leads.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17744418377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17744418377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00542-0

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00542-0

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 892

EP - 896

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 7

ER -