Safer Surgery by Learning from Complications: A Focus on Robotic Prostate Surgery

René J. Sotelo, Alexander Haese, Victor Machuca, Luis Medina, Luciano Nuñez, Flavio Santinelli, Andrés Hernandez, Ali Riza Kural, Alexander Mottrie, Camilo Giedelman, Mariano Mirandolino, Kenneth Palmer, Ronney Abaza, Reza Ghavamian, Arieh Shalhav, Alireza Moinzadeh, Vipul Patel, Michael Stifelman, Ingolf Tuerk, David Canes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The uptake of robotic surgery has led to changes in potential operative complications, as many surgeons learn minimally invasive surgery, and has allowed the documentation of such complications through the routine collection of intraoperative video. Objective We documented intraoperative complications from robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with the aim of reporting the mechanisms, etiology, and necessary steps to avoid them. Our goal was to facilitate learning from these complications to improve patient care. Design, setting, and participants Contributors delivered videos of complications that occurred during laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy between 2010 and 2015. Surgical procedure Surgical footage was available for a variety of complications during RARP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Based on these videos, a literature search was performed using relevant terms (prostatectomy, robotic, complications), and the intraoperative steps of the procedures and methods of preventing complications were outlined. Results and limitations As a major surgical procedure, RARP has much potential for intra- and postoperative complications related to patient positioning, access, and the procedure itself. However, with a dedicated approach, increasing experience, a low index of suspicion, and strict adherence to safety measures, we suggest that the majority of such complications are preventable. Conclusions Considering the complexity of the procedure, RARP is safe and reproducible for the surgical management of prostate cancer. Insight from experienced surgeons may allow surgeons to avoid complications during the learning curve. Patient summary Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has potential for intra- and postoperative complications, but with a dedicated approach, increasing experience, a low index of suspicion, and strict adherence to safety measures, most complications are preventable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)334-344
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume69
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Robotics
Prostatectomy
Prostate
Learning
Intraoperative Complications
Safety
Patient Positioning
Learning Curve
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Documentation
Prostatic Neoplasms
Patient Care
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Prostate
  • Robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Sotelo, R. J., Haese, A., Machuca, V., Medina, L., Nuñez, L., Santinelli, F., ... Canes, D. (2016). Safer Surgery by Learning from Complications: A Focus on Robotic Prostate Surgery. European Urology, 69(2), 334-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.060

Safer Surgery by Learning from Complications : A Focus on Robotic Prostate Surgery. / Sotelo, René J.; Haese, Alexander; Machuca, Victor; Medina, Luis; Nuñez, Luciano; Santinelli, Flavio; Hernandez, Andrés; Kural, Ali Riza; Mottrie, Alexander; Giedelman, Camilo; Mirandolino, Mariano; Palmer, Kenneth; Abaza, Ronney; Ghavamian, Reza; Shalhav, Arieh; Moinzadeh, Alireza; Patel, Vipul; Stifelman, Michael; Tuerk, Ingolf; Canes, David.

In: European Urology, Vol. 69, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 334-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sotelo, RJ, Haese, A, Machuca, V, Medina, L, Nuñez, L, Santinelli, F, Hernandez, A, Kural, AR, Mottrie, A, Giedelman, C, Mirandolino, M, Palmer, K, Abaza, R, Ghavamian, R, Shalhav, A, Moinzadeh, A, Patel, V, Stifelman, M, Tuerk, I & Canes, D 2016, 'Safer Surgery by Learning from Complications: A Focus on Robotic Prostate Surgery', European Urology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 334-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.060
Sotelo RJ, Haese A, Machuca V, Medina L, Nuñez L, Santinelli F et al. Safer Surgery by Learning from Complications: A Focus on Robotic Prostate Surgery. European Urology. 2016 Feb 1;69(2):334-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.060
Sotelo, René J. ; Haese, Alexander ; Machuca, Victor ; Medina, Luis ; Nuñez, Luciano ; Santinelli, Flavio ; Hernandez, Andrés ; Kural, Ali Riza ; Mottrie, Alexander ; Giedelman, Camilo ; Mirandolino, Mariano ; Palmer, Kenneth ; Abaza, Ronney ; Ghavamian, Reza ; Shalhav, Arieh ; Moinzadeh, Alireza ; Patel, Vipul ; Stifelman, Michael ; Tuerk, Ingolf ; Canes, David. / Safer Surgery by Learning from Complications : A Focus on Robotic Prostate Surgery. In: European Urology. 2016 ; Vol. 69, No. 2. pp. 334-344.
@article{edd5155dce8d468ca6b4bb275c59a931,
title = "Safer Surgery by Learning from Complications: A Focus on Robotic Prostate Surgery",
abstract = "Background The uptake of robotic surgery has led to changes in potential operative complications, as many surgeons learn minimally invasive surgery, and has allowed the documentation of such complications through the routine collection of intraoperative video. Objective We documented intraoperative complications from robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with the aim of reporting the mechanisms, etiology, and necessary steps to avoid them. Our goal was to facilitate learning from these complications to improve patient care. Design, setting, and participants Contributors delivered videos of complications that occurred during laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy between 2010 and 2015. Surgical procedure Surgical footage was available for a variety of complications during RARP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Based on these videos, a literature search was performed using relevant terms (prostatectomy, robotic, complications), and the intraoperative steps of the procedures and methods of preventing complications were outlined. Results and limitations As a major surgical procedure, RARP has much potential for intra- and postoperative complications related to patient positioning, access, and the procedure itself. However, with a dedicated approach, increasing experience, a low index of suspicion, and strict adherence to safety measures, we suggest that the majority of such complications are preventable. Conclusions Considering the complexity of the procedure, RARP is safe and reproducible for the surgical management of prostate cancer. Insight from experienced surgeons may allow surgeons to avoid complications during the learning curve. Patient summary Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has potential for intra- and postoperative complications, but with a dedicated approach, increasing experience, a low index of suspicion, and strict adherence to safety measures, most complications are preventable.",
keywords = "Prostate, Robotic surgery",
author = "Sotelo, {Ren{\'e} J.} and Alexander Haese and Victor Machuca and Luis Medina and Luciano Nu{\~n}ez and Flavio Santinelli and Andr{\'e}s Hernandez and Kural, {Ali Riza} and Alexander Mottrie and Camilo Giedelman and Mariano Mirandolino and Kenneth Palmer and Ronney Abaza and Reza Ghavamian and Arieh Shalhav and Alireza Moinzadeh and Vipul Patel and Michael Stifelman and Ingolf Tuerk and David Canes",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.060",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "334--344",
journal = "European Urology",
issn = "0302-2838",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safer Surgery by Learning from Complications

T2 - A Focus on Robotic Prostate Surgery

AU - Sotelo, René J.

AU - Haese, Alexander

AU - Machuca, Victor

AU - Medina, Luis

AU - Nuñez, Luciano

AU - Santinelli, Flavio

AU - Hernandez, Andrés

AU - Kural, Ali Riza

AU - Mottrie, Alexander

AU - Giedelman, Camilo

AU - Mirandolino, Mariano

AU - Palmer, Kenneth

AU - Abaza, Ronney

AU - Ghavamian, Reza

AU - Shalhav, Arieh

AU - Moinzadeh, Alireza

AU - Patel, Vipul

AU - Stifelman, Michael

AU - Tuerk, Ingolf

AU - Canes, David

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Background The uptake of robotic surgery has led to changes in potential operative complications, as many surgeons learn minimally invasive surgery, and has allowed the documentation of such complications through the routine collection of intraoperative video. Objective We documented intraoperative complications from robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with the aim of reporting the mechanisms, etiology, and necessary steps to avoid them. Our goal was to facilitate learning from these complications to improve patient care. Design, setting, and participants Contributors delivered videos of complications that occurred during laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy between 2010 and 2015. Surgical procedure Surgical footage was available for a variety of complications during RARP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Based on these videos, a literature search was performed using relevant terms (prostatectomy, robotic, complications), and the intraoperative steps of the procedures and methods of preventing complications were outlined. Results and limitations As a major surgical procedure, RARP has much potential for intra- and postoperative complications related to patient positioning, access, and the procedure itself. However, with a dedicated approach, increasing experience, a low index of suspicion, and strict adherence to safety measures, we suggest that the majority of such complications are preventable. Conclusions Considering the complexity of the procedure, RARP is safe and reproducible for the surgical management of prostate cancer. Insight from experienced surgeons may allow surgeons to avoid complications during the learning curve. Patient summary Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has potential for intra- and postoperative complications, but with a dedicated approach, increasing experience, a low index of suspicion, and strict adherence to safety measures, most complications are preventable.

AB - Background The uptake of robotic surgery has led to changes in potential operative complications, as many surgeons learn minimally invasive surgery, and has allowed the documentation of such complications through the routine collection of intraoperative video. Objective We documented intraoperative complications from robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with the aim of reporting the mechanisms, etiology, and necessary steps to avoid them. Our goal was to facilitate learning from these complications to improve patient care. Design, setting, and participants Contributors delivered videos of complications that occurred during laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy between 2010 and 2015. Surgical procedure Surgical footage was available for a variety of complications during RARP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Based on these videos, a literature search was performed using relevant terms (prostatectomy, robotic, complications), and the intraoperative steps of the procedures and methods of preventing complications were outlined. Results and limitations As a major surgical procedure, RARP has much potential for intra- and postoperative complications related to patient positioning, access, and the procedure itself. However, with a dedicated approach, increasing experience, a low index of suspicion, and strict adherence to safety measures, we suggest that the majority of such complications are preventable. Conclusions Considering the complexity of the procedure, RARP is safe and reproducible for the surgical management of prostate cancer. Insight from experienced surgeons may allow surgeons to avoid complications during the learning curve. Patient summary Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has potential for intra- and postoperative complications, but with a dedicated approach, increasing experience, a low index of suspicion, and strict adherence to safety measures, most complications are preventable.

KW - Prostate

KW - Robotic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952875826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952875826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.060

DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.060

M3 - Article

C2 - 26385157

AN - SCOPUS:84952875826

VL - 69

SP - 334

EP - 344

JO - European Urology

JF - European Urology

SN - 0302-2838

IS - 2

ER -