Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery

a contemporary review

Jayapriya Jayakumaran, Sejal D. Patel, Bhushan K. Gangrade, Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu, Soundarya Ramanatha Pandian, Celso Silva

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Robotic surgery is a conceptual fusion of the conventional open surgery and the minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery. We reviewed the current role of robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the field of reproductive surgery by a literature search in PubMed database. We analyzed the reported advantages and limitations of the use of robotics in reproductive surgeries like myomectomy, tubal reanastomosis, endometriosis, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and ovarian transposition. Overall, robotic assistance in reproductive surgery resulted in decreased blood loss, less post-operative pain, shorter hospital stay, and faster convalescence, whereas reproductive outcomes were similar to open/laparoscopic approaches. The main drawbacks of robotic surgery were higher cost and longer operating times. It is as safe and effective as the conventional laparoscopy and represents a reasonable alternate to abdominal approach. Procedures that are technically challenging with the conventional laparoscopy can be performed with robotic assistance. It has advantages of improved visualization and Endowrist™ movements allowing precise suturing. This helps to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy, especially in complicated procedures, and may shorten the steep learning curve in minimal invasive surgery. Randomized controlled trials looking at both short- and long-term outcomes are warranted to strengthen the role of robotic surgery in the field of reproductive surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-109
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Robotic Surgery
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Robotics
Laparoscopy
Uterine Myomectomy
Sterilization Reversal
Learning Curve
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Cryopreservation
Endometriosis
PubMed
Length of Stay
Randomized Controlled Trials
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pain

Keywords

  • Endometriosis
  • Myomectomy
  • Reproductive surgery
  • Robotic-assisted laparoscopy
  • Tubal reanastomosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Jayakumaran, J., Patel, S. D., Gangrade, B. K., Narasimhulu, D. M., Pandian, S. R., & Silva, C. (2017). Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 11(2), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0682-4

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery : a contemporary review. / Jayakumaran, Jayapriya; Patel, Sejal D.; Gangrade, Bhushan K.; Narasimhulu, Deepa Maheswari; Pandian, Soundarya Ramanatha; Silva, Celso.

In: Journal of Robotic Surgery, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 97-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Jayakumaran, J, Patel, SD, Gangrade, BK, Narasimhulu, DM, Pandian, SR & Silva, C 2017, 'Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review', Journal of Robotic Surgery, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0682-4
Jayakumaran J, Patel SD, Gangrade BK, Narasimhulu DM, Pandian SR, Silva C. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2017 Jun 1;11(2):97-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0682-4
Jayakumaran, Jayapriya ; Patel, Sejal D. ; Gangrade, Bhushan K. ; Narasimhulu, Deepa Maheswari ; Pandian, Soundarya Ramanatha ; Silva, Celso. / Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery : a contemporary review. In: Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 97-109.
@article{fd6180ffee0d4a5d897571584189af8d,
title = "Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review",
abstract = "Robotic surgery is a conceptual fusion of the conventional open surgery and the minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery. We reviewed the current role of robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the field of reproductive surgery by a literature search in PubMed database. We analyzed the reported advantages and limitations of the use of robotics in reproductive surgeries like myomectomy, tubal reanastomosis, endometriosis, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and ovarian transposition. Overall, robotic assistance in reproductive surgery resulted in decreased blood loss, less post-operative pain, shorter hospital stay, and faster convalescence, whereas reproductive outcomes were similar to open/laparoscopic approaches. The main drawbacks of robotic surgery were higher cost and longer operating times. It is as safe and effective as the conventional laparoscopy and represents a reasonable alternate to abdominal approach. Procedures that are technically challenging with the conventional laparoscopy can be performed with robotic assistance. It has advantages of improved visualization and Endowrist™ movements allowing precise suturing. This helps to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy, especially in complicated procedures, and may shorten the steep learning curve in minimal invasive surgery. Randomized controlled trials looking at both short- and long-term outcomes are warranted to strengthen the role of robotic surgery in the field of reproductive surgery.",
keywords = "Endometriosis, Myomectomy, Reproductive surgery, Robotic-assisted laparoscopy, Tubal reanastomosis",
author = "Jayapriya Jayakumaran and Patel, {Sejal D.} and Gangrade, {Bhushan K.} and Narasimhulu, {Deepa Maheswari} and Pandian, {Soundarya Ramanatha} and Celso Silva",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11701-017-0682-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "97--109",
journal = "Journal of Robotic Surgery",
issn = "1863-2483",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery

T2 - a contemporary review

AU - Jayakumaran, Jayapriya

AU - Patel, Sejal D.

AU - Gangrade, Bhushan K.

AU - Narasimhulu, Deepa Maheswari

AU - Pandian, Soundarya Ramanatha

AU - Silva, Celso

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Robotic surgery is a conceptual fusion of the conventional open surgery and the minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery. We reviewed the current role of robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the field of reproductive surgery by a literature search in PubMed database. We analyzed the reported advantages and limitations of the use of robotics in reproductive surgeries like myomectomy, tubal reanastomosis, endometriosis, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and ovarian transposition. Overall, robotic assistance in reproductive surgery resulted in decreased blood loss, less post-operative pain, shorter hospital stay, and faster convalescence, whereas reproductive outcomes were similar to open/laparoscopic approaches. The main drawbacks of robotic surgery were higher cost and longer operating times. It is as safe and effective as the conventional laparoscopy and represents a reasonable alternate to abdominal approach. Procedures that are technically challenging with the conventional laparoscopy can be performed with robotic assistance. It has advantages of improved visualization and Endowrist™ movements allowing precise suturing. This helps to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy, especially in complicated procedures, and may shorten the steep learning curve in minimal invasive surgery. Randomized controlled trials looking at both short- and long-term outcomes are warranted to strengthen the role of robotic surgery in the field of reproductive surgery.

AB - Robotic surgery is a conceptual fusion of the conventional open surgery and the minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery. We reviewed the current role of robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the field of reproductive surgery by a literature search in PubMed database. We analyzed the reported advantages and limitations of the use of robotics in reproductive surgeries like myomectomy, tubal reanastomosis, endometriosis, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and ovarian transposition. Overall, robotic assistance in reproductive surgery resulted in decreased blood loss, less post-operative pain, shorter hospital stay, and faster convalescence, whereas reproductive outcomes were similar to open/laparoscopic approaches. The main drawbacks of robotic surgery were higher cost and longer operating times. It is as safe and effective as the conventional laparoscopy and represents a reasonable alternate to abdominal approach. Procedures that are technically challenging with the conventional laparoscopy can be performed with robotic assistance. It has advantages of improved visualization and Endowrist™ movements allowing precise suturing. This helps to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy, especially in complicated procedures, and may shorten the steep learning curve in minimal invasive surgery. Randomized controlled trials looking at both short- and long-term outcomes are warranted to strengthen the role of robotic surgery in the field of reproductive surgery.

KW - Endometriosis

KW - Myomectomy

KW - Reproductive surgery

KW - Robotic-assisted laparoscopy

KW - Tubal reanastomosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012306095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012306095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11701-017-0682-4

DO - 10.1007/s11701-017-0682-4

M3 - Review article

VL - 11

SP - 97

EP - 109

JO - Journal of Robotic Surgery

JF - Journal of Robotic Surgery

SN - 1863-2483

IS - 2

ER -