TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk of New or Recurrent Cancer in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Previous Cancer Exposed to Immunosuppressive and Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents
AU - on behalf of the New York Crohn's and Colitis Organization (NYCCO)
AU - Axelrad, Jordan
AU - Bernheim, Oren
AU - Colombel, Jean Frederic
AU - Malerba, Stefano
AU - Ananthakrishnan, Ashwin
AU - Yajnik, Vijay
AU - Hoffman, Gila
AU - Agrawal, Manasi
AU - Lukin, Dana
AU - Desai, Amit
AU - McEachern, Elisa
AU - Bosworth, Brian
AU - Scherl, Ellen
AU - Reyes, Andre
AU - Zaidi, Hina
AU - Mudireddy, Prashant
AU - DiCaprio, David
AU - Sultan, Keith
AU - Korelitz, Burton
AU - Wang, Erwin
AU - Williams, Renee
AU - Chen, Lea Ann
AU - Katz, Seymour
AU - Itzkowitz, Steven
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding Supported in part by The Chemotherapy Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 AGA Institute.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Background & Aims: Our understanding of malignancy associated with immunosuppression in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) comes from studies of individuals with no history of cancer. We investigated whether patients with IBD and a history of cancer who were subsequently immunosuppressed have an increased risk of developing incident cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 333 patients with IBD treated at 8 academic medical centers who developed cancer and subsequently received treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF), anti-TNF with an antimetabolite (thiopurines, methotrexate), antimetabolites, or no subsequent exposure to immunosuppressive agents (controls). We collected data on their primary outcomes of incident cancers (new or recurrent). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by using Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier survival curves; study groups were compared by using the log-rank test. Results: During the follow-up period, 90 patients (27%) developed an incident cancer. Patient characteristics between groups differed, but matching was not possible because of the relatively small sample sizes. There was no difference in time to incident cancer (P = .14) or type of incident cancer (P = .61) among the 4 groups. After adjusting for recurrence risk for type of prior cancer, there was no difference in risk of incident cancer (HR for anti-TNF, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-1.09; HR for anti-TNF with an antimetabolite, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.26-1.59; HR for an antimetabolite, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.54-2.15) or time to subsequent cancer between study arms (P = .22). Conclusion: On the basis of a retrospective study, in patients with IBD and a history of cancer, exposure to an anti-TNF agent or an antimetabolite after cancer was not associated with an increased risk of incident cancer, compared with patients who did not receive immunosuppression. Larger, matched, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
AB - Background & Aims: Our understanding of malignancy associated with immunosuppression in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) comes from studies of individuals with no history of cancer. We investigated whether patients with IBD and a history of cancer who were subsequently immunosuppressed have an increased risk of developing incident cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 333 patients with IBD treated at 8 academic medical centers who developed cancer and subsequently received treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF), anti-TNF with an antimetabolite (thiopurines, methotrexate), antimetabolites, or no subsequent exposure to immunosuppressive agents (controls). We collected data on their primary outcomes of incident cancers (new or recurrent). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by using Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier survival curves; study groups were compared by using the log-rank test. Results: During the follow-up period, 90 patients (27%) developed an incident cancer. Patient characteristics between groups differed, but matching was not possible because of the relatively small sample sizes. There was no difference in time to incident cancer (P = .14) or type of incident cancer (P = .61) among the 4 groups. After adjusting for recurrence risk for type of prior cancer, there was no difference in risk of incident cancer (HR for anti-TNF, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-1.09; HR for anti-TNF with an antimetabolite, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.26-1.59; HR for an antimetabolite, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.54-2.15) or time to subsequent cancer between study arms (P = .22). Conclusion: On the basis of a retrospective study, in patients with IBD and a history of cancer, exposure to an anti-TNF agent or an antimetabolite after cancer was not associated with an increased risk of incident cancer, compared with patients who did not receive immunosuppression. Larger, matched, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
KW - Crohn's Disease
KW - Drug
KW - Tumor
KW - Ulcerative Colitis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958841167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958841167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.037
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.037
M3 - Article
C2 - 26247164
AN - SCOPUS:84958841167
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 14
SP - 58
EP - 64
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 1
ER -