Revolution and evolution: A brief intellectual history of American psychoanalysis during the past two decades

Peter Buckley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The past twenty years have witnessed revolutionary changes in the theory and practice of psychoanalysis in the United States. The previously dominant clinical model of ego psychology with its emphasis on ubiquitous unconscious conflict between instinctual drives and the demands of reality and conscience, all mediated by the ego, is now but one of an array of differing theoretical views vying for attention. The alternative competing theoretical and clinical domains can be loosely categorized under the rubrics of object relations, self psychology, and the off-shoots of these which include the relational and intersubjective frames. These insurgent models of mental functioning and development, all of which grow out of object relations theory and thus overlap conceptually, have significant implications for psychoanalytic technique. It is the purpose of this article to review aspects of these models and the historic and revolutionary changes that their appearance have effected in the psychoanalytic landscape. A brief summary will also be made of the more evolutionary advances that have occurred in ego psychology during the past two decades. The extant literature on these issues is complex and voluminous, not to say vast. In advance, I apologize for the necessarily selective and even idiosyncratic nature of this paper. Inevitably, many original and important contributions to the evolving mosaic that makes up contemporary psychoanalysis are ignored or short-changed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychotherapy
Volume57
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Ego
Psychoanalysis
Self Psychology
Psychology
Object Attachment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Revolution and evolution : A brief intellectual history of American psychoanalysis during the past two decades. / Buckley, Peter.

In: American Journal of Psychotherapy, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2003, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4434301557994f17a35ee24485d76c8c,
title = "Revolution and evolution: A brief intellectual history of American psychoanalysis during the past two decades",
abstract = "The past twenty years have witnessed revolutionary changes in the theory and practice of psychoanalysis in the United States. The previously dominant clinical model of ego psychology with its emphasis on ubiquitous unconscious conflict between instinctual drives and the demands of reality and conscience, all mediated by the ego, is now but one of an array of differing theoretical views vying for attention. The alternative competing theoretical and clinical domains can be loosely categorized under the rubrics of object relations, self psychology, and the off-shoots of these which include the relational and intersubjective frames. These insurgent models of mental functioning and development, all of which grow out of object relations theory and thus overlap conceptually, have significant implications for psychoanalytic technique. It is the purpose of this article to review aspects of these models and the historic and revolutionary changes that their appearance have effected in the psychoanalytic landscape. A brief summary will also be made of the more evolutionary advances that have occurred in ego psychology during the past two decades. The extant literature on these issues is complex and voluminous, not to say vast. In advance, I apologize for the necessarily selective and even idiosyncratic nature of this paper. Inevitably, many original and important contributions to the evolving mosaic that makes up contemporary psychoanalysis are ignored or short-changed.",
author = "Peter Buckley",
year = "2003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "American Journal of Psychotherapy",
issn = "0002-9564",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revolution and evolution

T2 - A brief intellectual history of American psychoanalysis during the past two decades

AU - Buckley, Peter

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The past twenty years have witnessed revolutionary changes in the theory and practice of psychoanalysis in the United States. The previously dominant clinical model of ego psychology with its emphasis on ubiquitous unconscious conflict between instinctual drives and the demands of reality and conscience, all mediated by the ego, is now but one of an array of differing theoretical views vying for attention. The alternative competing theoretical and clinical domains can be loosely categorized under the rubrics of object relations, self psychology, and the off-shoots of these which include the relational and intersubjective frames. These insurgent models of mental functioning and development, all of which grow out of object relations theory and thus overlap conceptually, have significant implications for psychoanalytic technique. It is the purpose of this article to review aspects of these models and the historic and revolutionary changes that their appearance have effected in the psychoanalytic landscape. A brief summary will also be made of the more evolutionary advances that have occurred in ego psychology during the past two decades. The extant literature on these issues is complex and voluminous, not to say vast. In advance, I apologize for the necessarily selective and even idiosyncratic nature of this paper. Inevitably, many original and important contributions to the evolving mosaic that makes up contemporary psychoanalysis are ignored or short-changed.

AB - The past twenty years have witnessed revolutionary changes in the theory and practice of psychoanalysis in the United States. The previously dominant clinical model of ego psychology with its emphasis on ubiquitous unconscious conflict between instinctual drives and the demands of reality and conscience, all mediated by the ego, is now but one of an array of differing theoretical views vying for attention. The alternative competing theoretical and clinical domains can be loosely categorized under the rubrics of object relations, self psychology, and the off-shoots of these which include the relational and intersubjective frames. These insurgent models of mental functioning and development, all of which grow out of object relations theory and thus overlap conceptually, have significant implications for psychoanalytic technique. It is the purpose of this article to review aspects of these models and the historic and revolutionary changes that their appearance have effected in the psychoanalytic landscape. A brief summary will also be made of the more evolutionary advances that have occurred in ego psychology during the past two decades. The extant literature on these issues is complex and voluminous, not to say vast. In advance, I apologize for the necessarily selective and even idiosyncratic nature of this paper. Inevitably, many original and important contributions to the evolving mosaic that makes up contemporary psychoanalysis are ignored or short-changed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037266646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037266646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12647565

AN - SCOPUS:0037266646

VL - 57

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - American Journal of Psychotherapy

JF - American Journal of Psychotherapy

SN - 0002-9564

IS - 1

ER -