Revisiting the challenges of training Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in chorionic villus sampling

Barrie G. Suskin, Anthony M. Sciscione, Nickolas Teigen, Thomas C. Jenkins, Ronald J. Wapner, Anthony R. Gregg, Susan J. Gross, Komal Bajaj

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background More than a decade ago, researchers described a survey of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows that showed that chorionic villus sampling training was limited for Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in the United States. Prenatal screening and diagnosis have rapidly evolved since then and include the introduction of noninvasive aneuploidy screening that uses cell-free fetal DNA. Yet, chorionic villus sampling remains the only method available for first-trimester genetic diagnosis. Objective This study evaluated the chorionic villus sampling training of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows with respect to availability, competency standards, and education methods. Study Design In November 2015, an electronic survey was sent to Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows and fellowship directors of accredited Maternal Fetal Medicine fellowship programs in the United States. Results Fifty-eight percent of fellows (179/310) and 46% of program directors (35/76) responded. Ninety-five percent of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows think that invasive diagnostic testing is essential to their training; 100% of fellows have amniocentesis training; and 65% have chorionic villus sampling training. The median number of chorionic villus sampling procedures that are expected during a fellowship in those who trained was 10. Eighty-eight percent of fellows and 89% of program directors state that chorionic villus sampling training could be better; 89% of fellows and 97% of directors would like access to simulated models. Barriers to training included lack of patients (71%) and lack of proficient attending supervisors (43%). Conclusion Since the last survey, >10 years ago, chorionic villus sampling training has declined further. A decrease in the number of procedures that are performed is the leading barrier to this training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)777.e1-777.e4
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume215
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Chorionic Villi Sampling
Mothers
Medicine
Prenatal Diagnosis
Amniocentesis
Aneuploidy
First Pregnancy Trimester
Research Personnel
Education
DNA

Keywords

  • chorionic villus sampling
  • fellowship
  • prenatal diagnosis
  • training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Suskin, B. G., Sciscione, A. M., Teigen, N., Jenkins, T. C., Wapner, R. J., Gregg, A. R., ... Bajaj, K. (2016). Revisiting the challenges of training Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in chorionic villus sampling. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 215(6), 777.e1-777.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.011

Revisiting the challenges of training Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in chorionic villus sampling. / Suskin, Barrie G.; Sciscione, Anthony M.; Teigen, Nickolas; Jenkins, Thomas C.; Wapner, Ronald J.; Gregg, Anthony R.; Gross, Susan J.; Bajaj, Komal.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 215, No. 6, 01.12.2016, p. 777.e1-777.e4.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Suskin, BG, Sciscione, AM, Teigen, N, Jenkins, TC, Wapner, RJ, Gregg, AR, Gross, SJ & Bajaj, K 2016, 'Revisiting the challenges of training Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in chorionic villus sampling', American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 215, no. 6, pp. 777.e1-777.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.011
Suskin, Barrie G. ; Sciscione, Anthony M. ; Teigen, Nickolas ; Jenkins, Thomas C. ; Wapner, Ronald J. ; Gregg, Anthony R. ; Gross, Susan J. ; Bajaj, Komal. / Revisiting the challenges of training Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in chorionic villus sampling. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016 ; Vol. 215, No. 6. pp. 777.e1-777.e4.
@article{0096e65c6e5e44b89bb31fca66229d17,
title = "Revisiting the challenges of training Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in chorionic villus sampling",
abstract = "Background More than a decade ago, researchers described a survey of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows that showed that chorionic villus sampling training was limited for Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in the United States. Prenatal screening and diagnosis have rapidly evolved since then and include the introduction of noninvasive aneuploidy screening that uses cell-free fetal DNA. Yet, chorionic villus sampling remains the only method available for first-trimester genetic diagnosis. Objective This study evaluated the chorionic villus sampling training of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows with respect to availability, competency standards, and education methods. Study Design In November 2015, an electronic survey was sent to Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows and fellowship directors of accredited Maternal Fetal Medicine fellowship programs in the United States. Results Fifty-eight percent of fellows (179/310) and 46{\%} of program directors (35/76) responded. Ninety-five percent of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows think that invasive diagnostic testing is essential to their training; 100{\%} of fellows have amniocentesis training; and 65{\%} have chorionic villus sampling training. The median number of chorionic villus sampling procedures that are expected during a fellowship in those who trained was 10. Eighty-eight percent of fellows and 89{\%} of program directors state that chorionic villus sampling training could be better; 89{\%} of fellows and 97{\%} of directors would like access to simulated models. Barriers to training included lack of patients (71{\%}) and lack of proficient attending supervisors (43{\%}). Conclusion Since the last survey, >10 years ago, chorionic villus sampling training has declined further. A decrease in the number of procedures that are performed is the leading barrier to this training.",
keywords = "chorionic villus sampling, fellowship, prenatal diagnosis, training",
author = "Suskin, {Barrie G.} and Sciscione, {Anthony M.} and Nickolas Teigen and Jenkins, {Thomas C.} and Wapner, {Ronald J.} and Gregg, {Anthony R.} and Gross, {Susan J.} and Komal Bajaj",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "215",
pages = "777.e1--777.e4",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the challenges of training Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in chorionic villus sampling

AU - Suskin, Barrie G.

AU - Sciscione, Anthony M.

AU - Teigen, Nickolas

AU - Jenkins, Thomas C.

AU - Wapner, Ronald J.

AU - Gregg, Anthony R.

AU - Gross, Susan J.

AU - Bajaj, Komal

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Background More than a decade ago, researchers described a survey of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows that showed that chorionic villus sampling training was limited for Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in the United States. Prenatal screening and diagnosis have rapidly evolved since then and include the introduction of noninvasive aneuploidy screening that uses cell-free fetal DNA. Yet, chorionic villus sampling remains the only method available for first-trimester genetic diagnosis. Objective This study evaluated the chorionic villus sampling training of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows with respect to availability, competency standards, and education methods. Study Design In November 2015, an electronic survey was sent to Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows and fellowship directors of accredited Maternal Fetal Medicine fellowship programs in the United States. Results Fifty-eight percent of fellows (179/310) and 46% of program directors (35/76) responded. Ninety-five percent of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows think that invasive diagnostic testing is essential to their training; 100% of fellows have amniocentesis training; and 65% have chorionic villus sampling training. The median number of chorionic villus sampling procedures that are expected during a fellowship in those who trained was 10. Eighty-eight percent of fellows and 89% of program directors state that chorionic villus sampling training could be better; 89% of fellows and 97% of directors would like access to simulated models. Barriers to training included lack of patients (71%) and lack of proficient attending supervisors (43%). Conclusion Since the last survey, >10 years ago, chorionic villus sampling training has declined further. A decrease in the number of procedures that are performed is the leading barrier to this training.

AB - Background More than a decade ago, researchers described a survey of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows that showed that chorionic villus sampling training was limited for Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in the United States. Prenatal screening and diagnosis have rapidly evolved since then and include the introduction of noninvasive aneuploidy screening that uses cell-free fetal DNA. Yet, chorionic villus sampling remains the only method available for first-trimester genetic diagnosis. Objective This study evaluated the chorionic villus sampling training of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows with respect to availability, competency standards, and education methods. Study Design In November 2015, an electronic survey was sent to Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows and fellowship directors of accredited Maternal Fetal Medicine fellowship programs in the United States. Results Fifty-eight percent of fellows (179/310) and 46% of program directors (35/76) responded. Ninety-five percent of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows think that invasive diagnostic testing is essential to their training; 100% of fellows have amniocentesis training; and 65% have chorionic villus sampling training. The median number of chorionic villus sampling procedures that are expected during a fellowship in those who trained was 10. Eighty-eight percent of fellows and 89% of program directors state that chorionic villus sampling training could be better; 89% of fellows and 97% of directors would like access to simulated models. Barriers to training included lack of patients (71%) and lack of proficient attending supervisors (43%). Conclusion Since the last survey, >10 years ago, chorionic villus sampling training has declined further. A decrease in the number of procedures that are performed is the leading barrier to this training.

KW - chorionic villus sampling

KW - fellowship

KW - prenatal diagnosis

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006295118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006295118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.011

M3 - Article

VL - 215

SP - 777.e1-777.e4

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 6

ER -