Rethinking headache chronification

Dana P. Turner, Todd A. Smitherman, Donald B. Penzien, Richard B. Lipton, Timothy T. Houle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objective of this series is to examine several threats to the interpretation of headache chronification studies that arise from methodological issues. The study of headache chronification has extensively used longitudinal designs with 2 or more measurement occasions. Unfortunately, application of these designs, when combined with the common practice of extreme score selection as well as the extant challenges in measuring headache frequency rates (eg, unreliability, regression to the mean), induces substantive threats to accurate interpretation of findings. Partitioning the amount of observed variance in rates of chronification and remission attributable to regression artifacts is a critical yet previously overlooked step to learning more about headache as a potentially progressive disease. In this series on rethinking headache chronification, we provide an overview of methodological issues in this area (this paper), highlight the influence of rounding error on estimates of headache frequency (second paper), examine the influence of random error and regression artifacts on estimates of chronification and remission (third paper), and consider future directions for this line of research (fourth paper).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)901-907
Number of pages7
JournalHeadache
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • chronic migraine
  • headache chronification
  • methodology
  • statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking headache chronification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this