Retention rate of silicone punctal plugs placed by residents in a general clinic setting

Neeti B. Parikh, Jasmine H. Francis, Robert A. Latkany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE:: To evaluate the retention rate of silicone punctal plugs placed in patients with dry eye in a general clinic setting by ophthalmology residents. METHODS:: A cohort study reviewing charts of 88 patients who underwent punctal plug placement in the resident clinic at The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary from January 2007 to November 2008. Information recorded included age and sex of the patients, date of insertion, initial versus replacement plug, type and size of plug, location of insertion, and retention versus spontaneous extrusion versus removal of plugs at follow-up visits. Follow-up data were recorded at 30 and 60 days. RESULTS:: Follow-up data for 106 plug placements were available at 30 days. A total of 71.7% were retained, 23.6% were lost, and 4.7% were removed. At 60 days, data were available for 96 plug placements. A total of 50.0% were retained, 47.9% were lost, 5.2% had been removed prior to 60 days, and 2.1% had been replaced prior to 60 days. CONCLUSION:: Spontaneous extrusion is a common complication in punctal plug insertion, and the retention rate in a general clinic setting with ophthalmology residents is low. This may suggest that attention should be placed on improved instruction in placement techniques and sizing, better patient education on avoidance of rubbing, and importance of follow-up. It may also support the need for better designed plugs or considering alternatives to the silicone plugs, or the placement of such plugs in a dedicated punctal plug clinic under supervision of an experienced attending physician.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)400-402
Number of pages3
JournalOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ophthalmology
Silicones
Patient Education
Ear
Cohort Studies
Physicians
Punctal Plugs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Retention rate of silicone punctal plugs placed by residents in a general clinic setting. / Parikh, Neeti B.; Francis, Jasmine H.; Latkany, Robert A.

In: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 26, No. 6, 11.2010, p. 400-402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Parikh, Neeti B. ; Francis, Jasmine H. ; Latkany, Robert A. / Retention rate of silicone punctal plugs placed by residents in a general clinic setting. In: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2010 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 400-402.
@article{037de0a20e2a4485a9b0364df95df51e,
title = "Retention rate of silicone punctal plugs placed by residents in a general clinic setting",
abstract = "PURPOSE:: To evaluate the retention rate of silicone punctal plugs placed in patients with dry eye in a general clinic setting by ophthalmology residents. METHODS:: A cohort study reviewing charts of 88 patients who underwent punctal plug placement in the resident clinic at The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary from January 2007 to November 2008. Information recorded included age and sex of the patients, date of insertion, initial versus replacement plug, type and size of plug, location of insertion, and retention versus spontaneous extrusion versus removal of plugs at follow-up visits. Follow-up data were recorded at 30 and 60 days. RESULTS:: Follow-up data for 106 plug placements were available at 30 days. A total of 71.7{\%} were retained, 23.6{\%} were lost, and 4.7{\%} were removed. At 60 days, data were available for 96 plug placements. A total of 50.0{\%} were retained, 47.9{\%} were lost, 5.2{\%} had been removed prior to 60 days, and 2.1{\%} had been replaced prior to 60 days. CONCLUSION:: Spontaneous extrusion is a common complication in punctal plug insertion, and the retention rate in a general clinic setting with ophthalmology residents is low. This may suggest that attention should be placed on improved instruction in placement techniques and sizing, better patient education on avoidance of rubbing, and importance of follow-up. It may also support the need for better designed plugs or considering alternatives to the silicone plugs, or the placement of such plugs in a dedicated punctal plug clinic under supervision of an experienced attending physician.",
author = "Parikh, {Neeti B.} and Francis, {Jasmine H.} and Latkany, {Robert A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181cd6145",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "400--402",
journal = "Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0740-9303",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retention rate of silicone punctal plugs placed by residents in a general clinic setting

AU - Parikh, Neeti B.

AU - Francis, Jasmine H.

AU - Latkany, Robert A.

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - PURPOSE:: To evaluate the retention rate of silicone punctal plugs placed in patients with dry eye in a general clinic setting by ophthalmology residents. METHODS:: A cohort study reviewing charts of 88 patients who underwent punctal plug placement in the resident clinic at The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary from January 2007 to November 2008. Information recorded included age and sex of the patients, date of insertion, initial versus replacement plug, type and size of plug, location of insertion, and retention versus spontaneous extrusion versus removal of plugs at follow-up visits. Follow-up data were recorded at 30 and 60 days. RESULTS:: Follow-up data for 106 plug placements were available at 30 days. A total of 71.7% were retained, 23.6% were lost, and 4.7% were removed. At 60 days, data were available for 96 plug placements. A total of 50.0% were retained, 47.9% were lost, 5.2% had been removed prior to 60 days, and 2.1% had been replaced prior to 60 days. CONCLUSION:: Spontaneous extrusion is a common complication in punctal plug insertion, and the retention rate in a general clinic setting with ophthalmology residents is low. This may suggest that attention should be placed on improved instruction in placement techniques and sizing, better patient education on avoidance of rubbing, and importance of follow-up. It may also support the need for better designed plugs or considering alternatives to the silicone plugs, or the placement of such plugs in a dedicated punctal plug clinic under supervision of an experienced attending physician.

AB - PURPOSE:: To evaluate the retention rate of silicone punctal plugs placed in patients with dry eye in a general clinic setting by ophthalmology residents. METHODS:: A cohort study reviewing charts of 88 patients who underwent punctal plug placement in the resident clinic at The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary from January 2007 to November 2008. Information recorded included age and sex of the patients, date of insertion, initial versus replacement plug, type and size of plug, location of insertion, and retention versus spontaneous extrusion versus removal of plugs at follow-up visits. Follow-up data were recorded at 30 and 60 days. RESULTS:: Follow-up data for 106 plug placements were available at 30 days. A total of 71.7% were retained, 23.6% were lost, and 4.7% were removed. At 60 days, data were available for 96 plug placements. A total of 50.0% were retained, 47.9% were lost, 5.2% had been removed prior to 60 days, and 2.1% had been replaced prior to 60 days. CONCLUSION:: Spontaneous extrusion is a common complication in punctal plug insertion, and the retention rate in a general clinic setting with ophthalmology residents is low. This may suggest that attention should be placed on improved instruction in placement techniques and sizing, better patient education on avoidance of rubbing, and importance of follow-up. It may also support the need for better designed plugs or considering alternatives to the silicone plugs, or the placement of such plugs in a dedicated punctal plug clinic under supervision of an experienced attending physician.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650516091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650516091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181cd6145

DO - 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181cd6145

M3 - Article

C2 - 20639781

AN - SCOPUS:78650516091

VL - 26

SP - 400

EP - 402

JO - Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0740-9303

IS - 6

ER -