Restricting Advertisements for High-Fat, High-Sugar Foods during Children's Television Programs: Attitudes in a US Population-Based Sample

Gina Tripicchio, Moonseong Heo, Lisa Diewald, Seth M. Noar, Rachel Dooley, Angelo Pietrobelli, Kyle S. Burger, Myles S. Faith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Children in the United States (US) are frequently exposed to advertisements for high-fat, high-sugar (HFHS) foods, which is linked to greater demand for and consumption of those foods. Restricting advertisements for HFHS foods may be a viable obesity prevention strategy - however, public support for policy change is unclear. Methods: A secondary analysis of the 2012 Annenberg National Health Communication Survey was conducted. Respondents (N = 1838) were 53.2% female, mean age 50.0 ± 16.5 years. Race/ethnic composition was 76.8% white, 7.4% black, 9.2% Hispanic, and 6.6% other. The percentage of respondents supporting and opposing the regulation was calculated and logistic regression models identified predictors of support. Potential predictors included sociodemographic variables, attitudes towards other health regulations (e.g., smoking bans in public places), and various health behaviors (e.g., fruit and vegetable intake). Results: A total of 56.3% of respondents supported or strongly supported advertisement restrictions, while only 8.2% strongly opposed. Approximately 20% had no opinion. Greatest support was found among respondents who supported smoking bans in public settings (OR = 4.3), who supported banning trans fats in restaurants (OR = 1.7), and who were older (OR = 1.7). Conclusion: The US adult population appears to have an appetite for restricting HFHS advertising to children, with more than half the populace supporting such a policy in 2012. This may be an opportune time to implement and rigorously evaluate such childhood obesity prevention strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-118
Number of pages6
JournalChildhood Obesity
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Television
Fats
Food
Population
Logistic Models
Smoking
Health Communication
Restaurants
Pediatric Obesity
Health Behavior
Appetite
Public Policy
Health Surveys
Hispanic Americans
Vegetables
Fruit
Obesity
Surveys and Questionnaires
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Restricting Advertisements for High-Fat, High-Sugar Foods during Children's Television Programs : Attitudes in a US Population-Based Sample. / Tripicchio, Gina; Heo, Moonseong; Diewald, Lisa; Noar, Seth M.; Dooley, Rachel; Pietrobelli, Angelo; Burger, Kyle S.; Faith, Myles S.

In: Childhood Obesity, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 113-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tripicchio, G, Heo, M, Diewald, L, Noar, SM, Dooley, R, Pietrobelli, A, Burger, KS & Faith, MS 2016, 'Restricting Advertisements for High-Fat, High-Sugar Foods during Children's Television Programs: Attitudes in a US Population-Based Sample', Childhood Obesity, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2015.0174
Tripicchio, Gina ; Heo, Moonseong ; Diewald, Lisa ; Noar, Seth M. ; Dooley, Rachel ; Pietrobelli, Angelo ; Burger, Kyle S. ; Faith, Myles S. / Restricting Advertisements for High-Fat, High-Sugar Foods during Children's Television Programs : Attitudes in a US Population-Based Sample. In: Childhood Obesity. 2016 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 113-118.
@article{8e8ae752542a4b689b32f29aceb2b5e4,
title = "Restricting Advertisements for High-Fat, High-Sugar Foods during Children's Television Programs: Attitudes in a US Population-Based Sample",
abstract = "Background: Children in the United States (US) are frequently exposed to advertisements for high-fat, high-sugar (HFHS) foods, which is linked to greater demand for and consumption of those foods. Restricting advertisements for HFHS foods may be a viable obesity prevention strategy - however, public support for policy change is unclear. Methods: A secondary analysis of the 2012 Annenberg National Health Communication Survey was conducted. Respondents (N = 1838) were 53.2{\%} female, mean age 50.0 ± 16.5 years. Race/ethnic composition was 76.8{\%} white, 7.4{\%} black, 9.2{\%} Hispanic, and 6.6{\%} other. The percentage of respondents supporting and opposing the regulation was calculated and logistic regression models identified predictors of support. Potential predictors included sociodemographic variables, attitudes towards other health regulations (e.g., smoking bans in public places), and various health behaviors (e.g., fruit and vegetable intake). Results: A total of 56.3{\%} of respondents supported or strongly supported advertisement restrictions, while only 8.2{\%} strongly opposed. Approximately 20{\%} had no opinion. Greatest support was found among respondents who supported smoking bans in public settings (OR = 4.3), who supported banning trans fats in restaurants (OR = 1.7), and who were older (OR = 1.7). Conclusion: The US adult population appears to have an appetite for restricting HFHS advertising to children, with more than half the populace supporting such a policy in 2012. This may be an opportune time to implement and rigorously evaluate such childhood obesity prevention strategies.",
author = "Gina Tripicchio and Moonseong Heo and Lisa Diewald and Noar, {Seth M.} and Rachel Dooley and Angelo Pietrobelli and Burger, {Kyle S.} and Faith, {Myles S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/chi.2015.0174",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "113--118",
journal = "Childhood Obesity",
issn = "2153-2168",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Restricting Advertisements for High-Fat, High-Sugar Foods during Children's Television Programs

T2 - Attitudes in a US Population-Based Sample

AU - Tripicchio, Gina

AU - Heo, Moonseong

AU - Diewald, Lisa

AU - Noar, Seth M.

AU - Dooley, Rachel

AU - Pietrobelli, Angelo

AU - Burger, Kyle S.

AU - Faith, Myles S.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Background: Children in the United States (US) are frequently exposed to advertisements for high-fat, high-sugar (HFHS) foods, which is linked to greater demand for and consumption of those foods. Restricting advertisements for HFHS foods may be a viable obesity prevention strategy - however, public support for policy change is unclear. Methods: A secondary analysis of the 2012 Annenberg National Health Communication Survey was conducted. Respondents (N = 1838) were 53.2% female, mean age 50.0 ± 16.5 years. Race/ethnic composition was 76.8% white, 7.4% black, 9.2% Hispanic, and 6.6% other. The percentage of respondents supporting and opposing the regulation was calculated and logistic regression models identified predictors of support. Potential predictors included sociodemographic variables, attitudes towards other health regulations (e.g., smoking bans in public places), and various health behaviors (e.g., fruit and vegetable intake). Results: A total of 56.3% of respondents supported or strongly supported advertisement restrictions, while only 8.2% strongly opposed. Approximately 20% had no opinion. Greatest support was found among respondents who supported smoking bans in public settings (OR = 4.3), who supported banning trans fats in restaurants (OR = 1.7), and who were older (OR = 1.7). Conclusion: The US adult population appears to have an appetite for restricting HFHS advertising to children, with more than half the populace supporting such a policy in 2012. This may be an opportune time to implement and rigorously evaluate such childhood obesity prevention strategies.

AB - Background: Children in the United States (US) are frequently exposed to advertisements for high-fat, high-sugar (HFHS) foods, which is linked to greater demand for and consumption of those foods. Restricting advertisements for HFHS foods may be a viable obesity prevention strategy - however, public support for policy change is unclear. Methods: A secondary analysis of the 2012 Annenberg National Health Communication Survey was conducted. Respondents (N = 1838) were 53.2% female, mean age 50.0 ± 16.5 years. Race/ethnic composition was 76.8% white, 7.4% black, 9.2% Hispanic, and 6.6% other. The percentage of respondents supporting and opposing the regulation was calculated and logistic regression models identified predictors of support. Potential predictors included sociodemographic variables, attitudes towards other health regulations (e.g., smoking bans in public places), and various health behaviors (e.g., fruit and vegetable intake). Results: A total of 56.3% of respondents supported or strongly supported advertisement restrictions, while only 8.2% strongly opposed. Approximately 20% had no opinion. Greatest support was found among respondents who supported smoking bans in public settings (OR = 4.3), who supported banning trans fats in restaurants (OR = 1.7), and who were older (OR = 1.7). Conclusion: The US adult population appears to have an appetite for restricting HFHS advertising to children, with more than half the populace supporting such a policy in 2012. This may be an opportune time to implement and rigorously evaluate such childhood obesity prevention strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962207886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962207886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/chi.2015.0174

DO - 10.1089/chi.2015.0174

M3 - Article

C2 - 26977541

AN - SCOPUS:84962207886

VL - 12

SP - 113

EP - 118

JO - Childhood Obesity

JF - Childhood Obesity

SN - 2153-2168

IS - 2

ER -