Reproductive coercion

An under-recognized challenge for primary care patients

Sharon J. Phillips, Ariana H. Bennett, Michele R. Hacker, Marji Gold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Reproductive coercion impacts many women of reproductive age. Objectives: We sought to explore how reproductive coercion, including pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage, impacts women in a primary care population. Methods: We administered a survey to women accessing care at a family medicine clinic in the Bronx, NY. Reproductive coercion was defined as a positive response to at least one of five questions adapted from previous studies. We assessed the association of reproductive and demographic characteristics with a lifetime history of reproductive coercion. Results: At least one form of reproductive coercion was reported by 24% of the 97 respondents. Current lack of personal safety and a history of transactional sex for money or a place to stay were significantly associated with having experienced reproductive coercion (all P ≤ 0.02). Conclusions: Reproductive coercion was common among women of reproductive age at this urban family medicine clinic in an underserved community, and was associated with other forms of control and violence. Clinicians are advised to discuss birth control sabotage and pregnancy coercion with their patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)286-289
Number of pages4
JournalFamily Practice
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Coercion
Primary Health Care
Contraception
Medicine
Pregnancy
Reproductive History
Violence
Demography
Safety

Keywords

  • Birth control sabotage
  • Contraception
  • Patients
  • Reproductive coercion
  • Underserved
  • Violence
  • Women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Reproductive coercion : An under-recognized challenge for primary care patients. / Phillips, Sharon J.; Bennett, Ariana H.; Hacker, Michele R.; Gold, Marji.

In: Family Practice, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.06.2016, p. 286-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Phillips, Sharon J. ; Bennett, Ariana H. ; Hacker, Michele R. ; Gold, Marji. / Reproductive coercion : An under-recognized challenge for primary care patients. In: Family Practice. 2016 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 286-289.
@article{df810a7bf1a348879b8c6a5210bd1033,
title = "Reproductive coercion: An under-recognized challenge for primary care patients",
abstract = "Background: Reproductive coercion impacts many women of reproductive age. Objectives: We sought to explore how reproductive coercion, including pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage, impacts women in a primary care population. Methods: We administered a survey to women accessing care at a family medicine clinic in the Bronx, NY. Reproductive coercion was defined as a positive response to at least one of five questions adapted from previous studies. We assessed the association of reproductive and demographic characteristics with a lifetime history of reproductive coercion. Results: At least one form of reproductive coercion was reported by 24{\%} of the 97 respondents. Current lack of personal safety and a history of transactional sex for money or a place to stay were significantly associated with having experienced reproductive coercion (all P ≤ 0.02). Conclusions: Reproductive coercion was common among women of reproductive age at this urban family medicine clinic in an underserved community, and was associated with other forms of control and violence. Clinicians are advised to discuss birth control sabotage and pregnancy coercion with their patients.",
keywords = "Birth control sabotage, Contraception, Patients, Reproductive coercion, Underserved, Violence, Women",
author = "Phillips, {Sharon J.} and Bennett, {Ariana H.} and Hacker, {Michele R.} and Marji Gold",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/fampra/cmw020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "286--289",
journal = "Family Practice",
issn = "0263-2136",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproductive coercion

T2 - An under-recognized challenge for primary care patients

AU - Phillips, Sharon J.

AU - Bennett, Ariana H.

AU - Hacker, Michele R.

AU - Gold, Marji

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Background: Reproductive coercion impacts many women of reproductive age. Objectives: We sought to explore how reproductive coercion, including pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage, impacts women in a primary care population. Methods: We administered a survey to women accessing care at a family medicine clinic in the Bronx, NY. Reproductive coercion was defined as a positive response to at least one of five questions adapted from previous studies. We assessed the association of reproductive and demographic characteristics with a lifetime history of reproductive coercion. Results: At least one form of reproductive coercion was reported by 24% of the 97 respondents. Current lack of personal safety and a history of transactional sex for money or a place to stay were significantly associated with having experienced reproductive coercion (all P ≤ 0.02). Conclusions: Reproductive coercion was common among women of reproductive age at this urban family medicine clinic in an underserved community, and was associated with other forms of control and violence. Clinicians are advised to discuss birth control sabotage and pregnancy coercion with their patients.

AB - Background: Reproductive coercion impacts many women of reproductive age. Objectives: We sought to explore how reproductive coercion, including pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage, impacts women in a primary care population. Methods: We administered a survey to women accessing care at a family medicine clinic in the Bronx, NY. Reproductive coercion was defined as a positive response to at least one of five questions adapted from previous studies. We assessed the association of reproductive and demographic characteristics with a lifetime history of reproductive coercion. Results: At least one form of reproductive coercion was reported by 24% of the 97 respondents. Current lack of personal safety and a history of transactional sex for money or a place to stay were significantly associated with having experienced reproductive coercion (all P ≤ 0.02). Conclusions: Reproductive coercion was common among women of reproductive age at this urban family medicine clinic in an underserved community, and was associated with other forms of control and violence. Clinicians are advised to discuss birth control sabotage and pregnancy coercion with their patients.

KW - Birth control sabotage

KW - Contraception

KW - Patients

KW - Reproductive coercion

KW - Underserved

KW - Violence

KW - Women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978766443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978766443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/fampra/cmw020

DO - 10.1093/fampra/cmw020

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 286

EP - 289

JO - Family Practice

JF - Family Practice

SN - 0263-2136

IS - 3

ER -