Reproducibility of the measurements of creatinine clearance in patients with a stable renal function

Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Przemyslaw Guzik, Zofia Niemir, Andrzej Breborowicz, Dimitrios G. Oreopoulos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In everyday practice the measurement of creatinine clearance (CCr) is used for the evaluation of the renal function. Since large body of evidence points to the in accuracy of this test, we decided to check whether a repeated measurement of CCr might improve the assessment of the glomerular filtration rate.The study comprised 233 subjects, 105 females and 128 males, aged 22-80 years (mean age:50.8 ± 12.8 years) with the history of renal stones and a stable renal function, e.g.without changes in plasma creatinine. In every patient CCr was measured twice. There after, all studied subjects were sorted by the increasing absolute values of the difference between two measurements of CCr e.g. as the difference between two measurements of CCr with omitted sign (absDCCr). Then, they were divided into 3 groups corresponding to the tertiles of abs DCCr (tertile = 1/3). When the two values of CCr were compared among all patients, the mean difference between them(DCCr) was only 1.51 ± 26.86 ml/min. The values of the individual DCCr varied, however, from -122.2. ml/min to 69.3 ml/min.As far as sex, age and height were concerned, there were no differences between the groups. However, weight was lower in group A (firsttertile) vs. group B (secondtertile) (p < 0.05). Also, BMI was lower in the group A vs. both group B and C (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01; respectively). In conclusion, our study points out to a poor reproducibility of the measurements of CCr innon-hospitalized subjects, especially in those with the high BMI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-112
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Urology and Nephrology
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Creatinine
Kidney
Glomerular Filtration Rate
History
Weights and Measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology
  • Urology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Reproducibility of the measurements of creatinine clearance in patients with a stable renal function. / Wieczorowska-Tobis, Katarzyna; Guzik, Przemyslaw; Niemir, Zofia; Breborowicz, Andrzej; Oreopoulos, Dimitrios G.

In: International Urology and Nephrology, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2004, p. 109-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wieczorowska-Tobis, Katarzyna ; Guzik, Przemyslaw ; Niemir, Zofia ; Breborowicz, Andrzej ; Oreopoulos, Dimitrios G. / Reproducibility of the measurements of creatinine clearance in patients with a stable renal function. In: International Urology and Nephrology. 2004 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 109-112.
@article{e9510e97ca6f417eae9ed7217d2389d4,
title = "Reproducibility of the measurements of creatinine clearance in patients with a stable renal function",
abstract = "In everyday practice the measurement of creatinine clearance (CCr) is used for the evaluation of the renal function. Since large body of evidence points to the in accuracy of this test, we decided to check whether a repeated measurement of CCr might improve the assessment of the glomerular filtration rate.The study comprised 233 subjects, 105 females and 128 males, aged 22-80 years (mean age:50.8 ± 12.8 years) with the history of renal stones and a stable renal function, e.g.without changes in plasma creatinine. In every patient CCr was measured twice. There after, all studied subjects were sorted by the increasing absolute values of the difference between two measurements of CCr e.g. as the difference between two measurements of CCr with omitted sign (absDCCr). Then, they were divided into 3 groups corresponding to the tertiles of abs DCCr (tertile = 1/3). When the two values of CCr were compared among all patients, the mean difference between them(DCCr) was only 1.51 ± 26.86 ml/min. The values of the individual DCCr varied, however, from -122.2. ml/min to 69.3 ml/min.As far as sex, age and height were concerned, there were no differences between the groups. However, weight was lower in group A (firsttertile) vs. group B (secondtertile) (p < 0.05). Also, BMI was lower in the group A vs. both group B and C (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01; respectively). In conclusion, our study points out to a poor reproducibility of the measurements of CCr innon-hospitalized subjects, especially in those with the high BMI.",
author = "Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis and Przemyslaw Guzik and Zofia Niemir and Andrzej Breborowicz and Oreopoulos, {Dimitrios G.}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1023/B:UROL.0000032750.00298.c7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "109--112",
journal = "International Urology and Nephrology",
issn = "0301-1623",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of the measurements of creatinine clearance in patients with a stable renal function

AU - Wieczorowska-Tobis, Katarzyna

AU - Guzik, Przemyslaw

AU - Niemir, Zofia

AU - Breborowicz, Andrzej

AU - Oreopoulos, Dimitrios G.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - In everyday practice the measurement of creatinine clearance (CCr) is used for the evaluation of the renal function. Since large body of evidence points to the in accuracy of this test, we decided to check whether a repeated measurement of CCr might improve the assessment of the glomerular filtration rate.The study comprised 233 subjects, 105 females and 128 males, aged 22-80 years (mean age:50.8 ± 12.8 years) with the history of renal stones and a stable renal function, e.g.without changes in plasma creatinine. In every patient CCr was measured twice. There after, all studied subjects were sorted by the increasing absolute values of the difference between two measurements of CCr e.g. as the difference between two measurements of CCr with omitted sign (absDCCr). Then, they were divided into 3 groups corresponding to the tertiles of abs DCCr (tertile = 1/3). When the two values of CCr were compared among all patients, the mean difference between them(DCCr) was only 1.51 ± 26.86 ml/min. The values of the individual DCCr varied, however, from -122.2. ml/min to 69.3 ml/min.As far as sex, age and height were concerned, there were no differences between the groups. However, weight was lower in group A (firsttertile) vs. group B (secondtertile) (p < 0.05). Also, BMI was lower in the group A vs. both group B and C (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01; respectively). In conclusion, our study points out to a poor reproducibility of the measurements of CCr innon-hospitalized subjects, especially in those with the high BMI.

AB - In everyday practice the measurement of creatinine clearance (CCr) is used for the evaluation of the renal function. Since large body of evidence points to the in accuracy of this test, we decided to check whether a repeated measurement of CCr might improve the assessment of the glomerular filtration rate.The study comprised 233 subjects, 105 females and 128 males, aged 22-80 years (mean age:50.8 ± 12.8 years) with the history of renal stones and a stable renal function, e.g.without changes in plasma creatinine. In every patient CCr was measured twice. There after, all studied subjects were sorted by the increasing absolute values of the difference between two measurements of CCr e.g. as the difference between two measurements of CCr with omitted sign (absDCCr). Then, they were divided into 3 groups corresponding to the tertiles of abs DCCr (tertile = 1/3). When the two values of CCr were compared among all patients, the mean difference between them(DCCr) was only 1.51 ± 26.86 ml/min. The values of the individual DCCr varied, however, from -122.2. ml/min to 69.3 ml/min.As far as sex, age and height were concerned, there were no differences between the groups. However, weight was lower in group A (firsttertile) vs. group B (secondtertile) (p < 0.05). Also, BMI was lower in the group A vs. both group B and C (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01; respectively). In conclusion, our study points out to a poor reproducibility of the measurements of CCr innon-hospitalized subjects, especially in those with the high BMI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042801615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042801615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/B:UROL.0000032750.00298.c7

DO - 10.1023/B:UROL.0000032750.00298.c7

M3 - Article

C2 - 15338686

AN - SCOPUS:3042801615

VL - 36

SP - 109

EP - 112

JO - International Urology and Nephrology

JF - International Urology and Nephrology

SN - 0301-1623

IS - 1

ER -