Reproducibility of myelin water fraction analysis

a comparison of region of interest and voxel-based analysis methods

Sandra M. Meyers, Cornelia Laule, Irene M. Vavasour, Shannon H. Kolind, Burkhard Mädler, Roger Tam, Anthony L. Traboulsee, Jimmy S. Lee, David K.B. Li, Alex L. MacKay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared region of interest (ROI) and voxel-based analysis (VBA) methods to determine the optimal method of myelin water fraction (MWF) analysis. Twenty healthy controls were scanned twice using a multi-echo T2 relaxation sequence and ROIs were drawn in white and grey matter. MWF was defined as the fractional signal from 15 to 40 ms in the T2 distribution. For ROI analysis, the mean intensity of voxels within an ROI was fit using non-negative least squares. For VBA, MWF was obtained for each voxel and the mean and median values within an ROI were calculated. There was a slightly higher correlation between Scan 1 and 2 for the VBA method (R2=0.98) relative to the ROI method (R2=0.95), and the VBA mean square difference between scans was 300% lower, indicating VBA was the most consistent between scans. For the VBA method, mean MWF was found to be more reproducible than median MWF. As the VBA method is more reproducible and gives more options for visualization and analysis of MWF, it is recommended over the ROI method of MWF analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1096-1103
Number of pages8
JournalMagnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume27
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Myelin Sheath
Water
Water analysis
Least-Squares Analysis
Visualization

Keywords

  • Myelin water
  • NNLS
  • T relaxation
  • Voxel-based analysis
  • White matter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Meyers, S. M., Laule, C., Vavasour, I. M., Kolind, S. H., Mädler, B., Tam, R., ... MacKay, A. L. (2009). Reproducibility of myelin water fraction analysis: a comparison of region of interest and voxel-based analysis methods. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27(8), 1096-1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2009.02.001

Reproducibility of myelin water fraction analysis : a comparison of region of interest and voxel-based analysis methods. / Meyers, Sandra M.; Laule, Cornelia; Vavasour, Irene M.; Kolind, Shannon H.; Mädler, Burkhard; Tam, Roger; Traboulsee, Anthony L.; Lee, Jimmy S.; Li, David K.B.; MacKay, Alex L.

In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 27, No. 8, 10.2009, p. 1096-1103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meyers, SM, Laule, C, Vavasour, IM, Kolind, SH, Mädler, B, Tam, R, Traboulsee, AL, Lee, JS, Li, DKB & MacKay, AL 2009, 'Reproducibility of myelin water fraction analysis: a comparison of region of interest and voxel-based analysis methods', Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1096-1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2009.02.001
Meyers, Sandra M. ; Laule, Cornelia ; Vavasour, Irene M. ; Kolind, Shannon H. ; Mädler, Burkhard ; Tam, Roger ; Traboulsee, Anthony L. ; Lee, Jimmy S. ; Li, David K.B. ; MacKay, Alex L. / Reproducibility of myelin water fraction analysis : a comparison of region of interest and voxel-based analysis methods. In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2009 ; Vol. 27, No. 8. pp. 1096-1103.
@article{9439f8bd29724d268271c85630486f6d,
title = "Reproducibility of myelin water fraction analysis: a comparison of region of interest and voxel-based analysis methods",
abstract = "This study compared region of interest (ROI) and voxel-based analysis (VBA) methods to determine the optimal method of myelin water fraction (MWF) analysis. Twenty healthy controls were scanned twice using a multi-echo T2 relaxation sequence and ROIs were drawn in white and grey matter. MWF was defined as the fractional signal from 15 to 40 ms in the T2 distribution. For ROI analysis, the mean intensity of voxels within an ROI was fit using non-negative least squares. For VBA, MWF was obtained for each voxel and the mean and median values within an ROI were calculated. There was a slightly higher correlation between Scan 1 and 2 for the VBA method (R2=0.98) relative to the ROI method (R2=0.95), and the VBA mean square difference between scans was 300{\%} lower, indicating VBA was the most consistent between scans. For the VBA method, mean MWF was found to be more reproducible than median MWF. As the VBA method is more reproducible and gives more options for visualization and analysis of MWF, it is recommended over the ROI method of MWF analysis.",
keywords = "Myelin water, NNLS, T relaxation, Voxel-based analysis, White matter",
author = "Meyers, {Sandra M.} and Cornelia Laule and Vavasour, {Irene M.} and Kolind, {Shannon H.} and Burkhard M{\"a}dler and Roger Tam and Traboulsee, {Anthony L.} and Lee, {Jimmy S.} and Li, {David K.B.} and MacKay, {Alex L.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.mri.2009.02.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1096--1103",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "0730-725X",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of myelin water fraction analysis

T2 - a comparison of region of interest and voxel-based analysis methods

AU - Meyers, Sandra M.

AU - Laule, Cornelia

AU - Vavasour, Irene M.

AU - Kolind, Shannon H.

AU - Mädler, Burkhard

AU - Tam, Roger

AU - Traboulsee, Anthony L.

AU - Lee, Jimmy S.

AU - Li, David K.B.

AU - MacKay, Alex L.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - This study compared region of interest (ROI) and voxel-based analysis (VBA) methods to determine the optimal method of myelin water fraction (MWF) analysis. Twenty healthy controls were scanned twice using a multi-echo T2 relaxation sequence and ROIs were drawn in white and grey matter. MWF was defined as the fractional signal from 15 to 40 ms in the T2 distribution. For ROI analysis, the mean intensity of voxels within an ROI was fit using non-negative least squares. For VBA, MWF was obtained for each voxel and the mean and median values within an ROI were calculated. There was a slightly higher correlation between Scan 1 and 2 for the VBA method (R2=0.98) relative to the ROI method (R2=0.95), and the VBA mean square difference between scans was 300% lower, indicating VBA was the most consistent between scans. For the VBA method, mean MWF was found to be more reproducible than median MWF. As the VBA method is more reproducible and gives more options for visualization and analysis of MWF, it is recommended over the ROI method of MWF analysis.

AB - This study compared region of interest (ROI) and voxel-based analysis (VBA) methods to determine the optimal method of myelin water fraction (MWF) analysis. Twenty healthy controls were scanned twice using a multi-echo T2 relaxation sequence and ROIs were drawn in white and grey matter. MWF was defined as the fractional signal from 15 to 40 ms in the T2 distribution. For ROI analysis, the mean intensity of voxels within an ROI was fit using non-negative least squares. For VBA, MWF was obtained for each voxel and the mean and median values within an ROI were calculated. There was a slightly higher correlation between Scan 1 and 2 for the VBA method (R2=0.98) relative to the ROI method (R2=0.95), and the VBA mean square difference between scans was 300% lower, indicating VBA was the most consistent between scans. For the VBA method, mean MWF was found to be more reproducible than median MWF. As the VBA method is more reproducible and gives more options for visualization and analysis of MWF, it is recommended over the ROI method of MWF analysis.

KW - Myelin water

KW - NNLS

KW - T relaxation

KW - Voxel-based analysis

KW - White matter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70049109261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70049109261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.mri.2009.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.mri.2009.02.001

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 1096

EP - 1103

JO - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 0730-725X

IS - 8

ER -