Reply to "comment on 'resonance raman scattering and collision-induced redistribution scattering in i2' "

D. L. Rousseau; G. D. Patterson; P. F. Williams

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.1441

Reply to "comment on 'resonance raman scattering and collision-induced redistribution scattering in i2' "

D. L. Rousseau, G. D. Patterson, P. F. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

We demonstrate that neither laser broadening nor inelastic collisional broadening plays a dominant role in the data of our recent experiments as has been suggested, and again we conclude that our results can only be explained by redistribution emission resulting from phase-changing processes.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1441-1444
Number of pages	4
Journal	Physical Review Letters
Volume	37
Issue number	21
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.1441
State	Published - 1976
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Physics and Astronomy(all)

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.1441

Cite this

@article{d7f84a9a31e94a72a6fde18094c27fd0,

title = "Reply to {"}comment on 'resonance raman scattering and collision-induced redistribution scattering in i2' {"}",

abstract = "We demonstrate that neither laser broadening nor inelastic collisional broadening plays a dominant role in the data of our recent experiments as has been suggested, and again we conclude that our results can only be explained by redistribution emission resulting from phase-changing processes.",

author = "Rousseau, {D. L.} and Patterson, {G. D.} and Williams, {P. F.}",

year = "1976",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.1441",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "37",

pages = "1441--1444",

journal = "Physical Review Letters",

issn = "0031-9007",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to "comment on 'resonance raman scattering and collision-induced redistribution scattering in i2' "

AU - Rousseau, D. L.

AU - Patterson, G. D.

AU - Williams, P. F.

PY - 1976

Y1 - 1976

N2 - We demonstrate that neither laser broadening nor inelastic collisional broadening plays a dominant role in the data of our recent experiments as has been suggested, and again we conclude that our results can only be explained by redistribution emission resulting from phase-changing processes.

AB - We demonstrate that neither laser broadening nor inelastic collisional broadening plays a dominant role in the data of our recent experiments as has been suggested, and again we conclude that our results can only be explained by redistribution emission resulting from phase-changing processes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35949034653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35949034653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.1441

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.1441

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:35949034653

SN - 0031-9007

VL - 37

SP - 1441

EP - 1444

JO - Physical Review Letters

JF - Physical Review Letters

IS - 21

ER -

Reply to "comment on 'resonance raman scattering and collision-induced redistribution scattering in i2' "

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this