Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy: Is it worth trying?

V. Siomin, H. Weiner, J. Wisoff, G. Cinalli, A. Pierre-Kahn, C. Saint-Rose, Ira Richmond Abbott, III, H. Elran, L. Beni-Adani, G. Ouaknine, S. Constantini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object: The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and indications for repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomies (ETV). Methods and results: We reviewed the records of 20 patients who had undergone repeat ETV from 1987 to 1999. Their ages ranged from 8 months to 53 years (mean 17 years). The primary etiologies of hydrocephalus were: primary aqueductal stenosis (9 cases), tumor (5), Chiari malformation (2), prior infection (2), prior intraventricular hemorrhage (1), and blocked foramen of Monro (1 patient). The interval between the first and second ETVs ranged from 8 days to almost 6 years (mean 12.8 months). The intraoperative findings at repeat surgery were: occlusion of the primary orifice by scar (10 cases), virginal floor of the third ventricle (5 cases), pinhole ventriculostomy (3 cases), incompletely penetrated membrane (1 case), and blood clot occluding the orifice (1 case). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 47 months (median 20 months). Repeat ETV was successful in 13 patients (65%). These patients did not require further shunting or other procedures during follow-up. Seven patients (35%) required placement of a shunt after repeat ETV. Several complications were observed in 1 patient (5%), including seizures, elevated ICP, bilateral pulmonary edema, and cardiac arrhythmia. This patient ultimately recovered fully: the ETV was successful, and the patient did not require a shunt. Conclusions: Based on the experience of this group of patients, repeat ETV is as effective and as safe as a primary ETV procedure, and should be attempted in selected patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)551-555
Number of pages5
JournalChild's Nervous System
Volume17
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ventriculostomy
Hydrocephalus
Cerebral Ventricles
Third Ventricle
Pulmonary Edema
Reoperation
Cicatrix
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Seizures
Thrombosis

Keywords

  • Aqueductal stenosis
  • Endoscopy
  • Hydrocephalus
  • Third ventriculostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Siomin, V., Weiner, H., Wisoff, J., Cinalli, G., Pierre-Kahn, A., Saint-Rose, C., ... Constantini, S. (2001). Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy: Is it worth trying? Child's Nervous System, 17(9), 551-555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810100475

Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy : Is it worth trying? / Siomin, V.; Weiner, H.; Wisoff, J.; Cinalli, G.; Pierre-Kahn, A.; Saint-Rose, C.; Abbott, III, Ira Richmond; Elran, H.; Beni-Adani, L.; Ouaknine, G.; Constantini, S.

In: Child's Nervous System, Vol. 17, No. 9, 2001, p. 551-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Siomin, V, Weiner, H, Wisoff, J, Cinalli, G, Pierre-Kahn, A, Saint-Rose, C, Abbott, III, IR, Elran, H, Beni-Adani, L, Ouaknine, G & Constantini, S 2001, 'Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy: Is it worth trying?', Child's Nervous System, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 551-555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810100475
Siomin V, Weiner H, Wisoff J, Cinalli G, Pierre-Kahn A, Saint-Rose C et al. Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy: Is it worth trying? Child's Nervous System. 2001;17(9):551-555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810100475
Siomin, V. ; Weiner, H. ; Wisoff, J. ; Cinalli, G. ; Pierre-Kahn, A. ; Saint-Rose, C. ; Abbott, III, Ira Richmond ; Elran, H. ; Beni-Adani, L. ; Ouaknine, G. ; Constantini, S. / Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy : Is it worth trying?. In: Child's Nervous System. 2001 ; Vol. 17, No. 9. pp. 551-555.
@article{a3104100683343f9a150b39c0c8bcf62,
title = "Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy: Is it worth trying?",
abstract = "Object: The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and indications for repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomies (ETV). Methods and results: We reviewed the records of 20 patients who had undergone repeat ETV from 1987 to 1999. Their ages ranged from 8 months to 53 years (mean 17 years). The primary etiologies of hydrocephalus were: primary aqueductal stenosis (9 cases), tumor (5), Chiari malformation (2), prior infection (2), prior intraventricular hemorrhage (1), and blocked foramen of Monro (1 patient). The interval between the first and second ETVs ranged from 8 days to almost 6 years (mean 12.8 months). The intraoperative findings at repeat surgery were: occlusion of the primary orifice by scar (10 cases), virginal floor of the third ventricle (5 cases), pinhole ventriculostomy (3 cases), incompletely penetrated membrane (1 case), and blood clot occluding the orifice (1 case). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 47 months (median 20 months). Repeat ETV was successful in 13 patients (65{\%}). These patients did not require further shunting or other procedures during follow-up. Seven patients (35{\%}) required placement of a shunt after repeat ETV. Several complications were observed in 1 patient (5{\%}), including seizures, elevated ICP, bilateral pulmonary edema, and cardiac arrhythmia. This patient ultimately recovered fully: the ETV was successful, and the patient did not require a shunt. Conclusions: Based on the experience of this group of patients, repeat ETV is as effective and as safe as a primary ETV procedure, and should be attempted in selected patients.",
keywords = "Aqueductal stenosis, Endoscopy, Hydrocephalus, Third ventriculostomy",
author = "V. Siomin and H. Weiner and J. Wisoff and G. Cinalli and A. Pierre-Kahn and C. Saint-Rose and {Abbott, III}, {Ira Richmond} and H. Elran and L. Beni-Adani and G. Ouaknine and S. Constantini",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1007/s003810100475",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "551--555",
journal = "Child's Nervous System",
issn = "0256-7040",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy

T2 - Is it worth trying?

AU - Siomin, V.

AU - Weiner, H.

AU - Wisoff, J.

AU - Cinalli, G.

AU - Pierre-Kahn, A.

AU - Saint-Rose, C.

AU - Abbott, III, Ira Richmond

AU - Elran, H.

AU - Beni-Adani, L.

AU - Ouaknine, G.

AU - Constantini, S.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Object: The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and indications for repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomies (ETV). Methods and results: We reviewed the records of 20 patients who had undergone repeat ETV from 1987 to 1999. Their ages ranged from 8 months to 53 years (mean 17 years). The primary etiologies of hydrocephalus were: primary aqueductal stenosis (9 cases), tumor (5), Chiari malformation (2), prior infection (2), prior intraventricular hemorrhage (1), and blocked foramen of Monro (1 patient). The interval between the first and second ETVs ranged from 8 days to almost 6 years (mean 12.8 months). The intraoperative findings at repeat surgery were: occlusion of the primary orifice by scar (10 cases), virginal floor of the third ventricle (5 cases), pinhole ventriculostomy (3 cases), incompletely penetrated membrane (1 case), and blood clot occluding the orifice (1 case). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 47 months (median 20 months). Repeat ETV was successful in 13 patients (65%). These patients did not require further shunting or other procedures during follow-up. Seven patients (35%) required placement of a shunt after repeat ETV. Several complications were observed in 1 patient (5%), including seizures, elevated ICP, bilateral pulmonary edema, and cardiac arrhythmia. This patient ultimately recovered fully: the ETV was successful, and the patient did not require a shunt. Conclusions: Based on the experience of this group of patients, repeat ETV is as effective and as safe as a primary ETV procedure, and should be attempted in selected patients.

AB - Object: The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and indications for repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomies (ETV). Methods and results: We reviewed the records of 20 patients who had undergone repeat ETV from 1987 to 1999. Their ages ranged from 8 months to 53 years (mean 17 years). The primary etiologies of hydrocephalus were: primary aqueductal stenosis (9 cases), tumor (5), Chiari malformation (2), prior infection (2), prior intraventricular hemorrhage (1), and blocked foramen of Monro (1 patient). The interval between the first and second ETVs ranged from 8 days to almost 6 years (mean 12.8 months). The intraoperative findings at repeat surgery were: occlusion of the primary orifice by scar (10 cases), virginal floor of the third ventricle (5 cases), pinhole ventriculostomy (3 cases), incompletely penetrated membrane (1 case), and blood clot occluding the orifice (1 case). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 47 months (median 20 months). Repeat ETV was successful in 13 patients (65%). These patients did not require further shunting or other procedures during follow-up. Seven patients (35%) required placement of a shunt after repeat ETV. Several complications were observed in 1 patient (5%), including seizures, elevated ICP, bilateral pulmonary edema, and cardiac arrhythmia. This patient ultimately recovered fully: the ETV was successful, and the patient did not require a shunt. Conclusions: Based on the experience of this group of patients, repeat ETV is as effective and as safe as a primary ETV procedure, and should be attempted in selected patients.

KW - Aqueductal stenosis

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Hydrocephalus

KW - Third ventriculostomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17944369708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17944369708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s003810100475

DO - 10.1007/s003810100475

M3 - Article

C2 - 11585330

AN - SCOPUS:17944369708

VL - 17

SP - 551

EP - 555

JO - Child's Nervous System

JF - Child's Nervous System

SN - 0256-7040

IS - 9

ER -