Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

729 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Reliable and valid measures of pain are needed to advance research initiatives on appropriate and effective use of analgesia in the emergency department (ED). The reliability of visual analog scale (VAS) scores has not been demonstrated in the acute setting where pain fluctuation might be greater than for chronic pain. The objective of the study was to assess the reliability of the VAS for measurement of acute pain. Methods: This was a prospective convenience sample of adults with acute pain presenting to two EDs. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and a Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess reliability of paired VAS measurements obtained 1 minute apart every 30 minutes over two hours. Results: The summary ICC for all paired VAS scores was 0.97 [95% CI = 0.96 to 0.98]. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that 50% of the paired measurements were within 2 mm of one another, 90% were within 9 mm, and 95% were within 16 mm. The paired measurements were more reproducible at the extremes of pain intensity than at moderate levels of pain. Conclusions: Reliability of the VAS for acute pain measurement as assessed by the ICC appears to be high. Ninety percent of the pain ratings were reproducible within 9 mm. These data suggest that the VAS is sufficiently reliable to be used to assess acute pain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1153-1157
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume8
Issue number12
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Acute Pain
Visual Analog Scale
Pain
Confidence Intervals
Pain Measurement
Chronic Pain
Analgesia
Hospital Emergency Service
Research

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Pain measurement
  • Reproducibility of results

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. / Bijur, Polly E.; Silver, W.; Gallagher, E. John.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 12, 2001, p. 1153-1157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d927a7613c60483aa5260a60cba31002,
title = "Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain",
abstract = "Objective: Reliable and valid measures of pain are needed to advance research initiatives on appropriate and effective use of analgesia in the emergency department (ED). The reliability of visual analog scale (VAS) scores has not been demonstrated in the acute setting where pain fluctuation might be greater than for chronic pain. The objective of the study was to assess the reliability of the VAS for measurement of acute pain. Methods: This was a prospective convenience sample of adults with acute pain presenting to two EDs. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95{\%} confidence intervals (95{\%} CIs) and a Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess reliability of paired VAS measurements obtained 1 minute apart every 30 minutes over two hours. Results: The summary ICC for all paired VAS scores was 0.97 [95{\%} CI = 0.96 to 0.98]. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that 50{\%} of the paired measurements were within 2 mm of one another, 90{\%} were within 9 mm, and 95{\%} were within 16 mm. The paired measurements were more reproducible at the extremes of pain intensity than at moderate levels of pain. Conclusions: Reliability of the VAS for acute pain measurement as assessed by the ICC appears to be high. Ninety percent of the pain ratings were reproducible within 9 mm. These data suggest that the VAS is sufficiently reliable to be used to assess acute pain.",
keywords = "Pain, Pain measurement, Reproducibility of results",
author = "Bijur, {Polly E.} and W. Silver and Gallagher, {E. John}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "1153--1157",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain

AU - Bijur, Polly E.

AU - Silver, W.

AU - Gallagher, E. John

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: Reliable and valid measures of pain are needed to advance research initiatives on appropriate and effective use of analgesia in the emergency department (ED). The reliability of visual analog scale (VAS) scores has not been demonstrated in the acute setting where pain fluctuation might be greater than for chronic pain. The objective of the study was to assess the reliability of the VAS for measurement of acute pain. Methods: This was a prospective convenience sample of adults with acute pain presenting to two EDs. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and a Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess reliability of paired VAS measurements obtained 1 minute apart every 30 minutes over two hours. Results: The summary ICC for all paired VAS scores was 0.97 [95% CI = 0.96 to 0.98]. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that 50% of the paired measurements were within 2 mm of one another, 90% were within 9 mm, and 95% were within 16 mm. The paired measurements were more reproducible at the extremes of pain intensity than at moderate levels of pain. Conclusions: Reliability of the VAS for acute pain measurement as assessed by the ICC appears to be high. Ninety percent of the pain ratings were reproducible within 9 mm. These data suggest that the VAS is sufficiently reliable to be used to assess acute pain.

AB - Objective: Reliable and valid measures of pain are needed to advance research initiatives on appropriate and effective use of analgesia in the emergency department (ED). The reliability of visual analog scale (VAS) scores has not been demonstrated in the acute setting where pain fluctuation might be greater than for chronic pain. The objective of the study was to assess the reliability of the VAS for measurement of acute pain. Methods: This was a prospective convenience sample of adults with acute pain presenting to two EDs. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and a Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess reliability of paired VAS measurements obtained 1 minute apart every 30 minutes over two hours. Results: The summary ICC for all paired VAS scores was 0.97 [95% CI = 0.96 to 0.98]. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that 50% of the paired measurements were within 2 mm of one another, 90% were within 9 mm, and 95% were within 16 mm. The paired measurements were more reproducible at the extremes of pain intensity than at moderate levels of pain. Conclusions: Reliability of the VAS for acute pain measurement as assessed by the ICC appears to be high. Ninety percent of the pain ratings were reproducible within 9 mm. These data suggest that the VAS is sufficiently reliable to be used to assess acute pain.

KW - Pain

KW - Pain measurement

KW - Reproducibility of results

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035190677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035190677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11733293

AN - SCOPUS:0035190677

VL - 8

SP - 1153

EP - 1157

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 12

ER -