Reliability of blood glucose monitoring by patients with diabetes mellitus

Roger S. Mazze, Harry Shamoon, Rosemarie Pasmantier, David Lucido, Joann Murphy, Klaus Hartmann, Victor Kuykendall, William Lopatin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

209 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nineteen patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were evaluated for overall reliability of self-generated data from capillary blood glucose monitoring. For a period of 12 to 14 days, standard reflectance meters used by these subjects were replaced by meters internally modified with memory chips capable of storing all glucose readings by date and time. The subjects were not aware of this modification and were instructed to continue to test capillary blood glucose as they had been and to continue their practice of recording the meter readings in a logbook. To assess reliability of patientgenerated data as recorded in the logbook, the addition, deletion, and alteration of test results were determined. A significantly lower (p < 0.0001) mean blood glucose level was reported in the logbooks than recorded in the memory reflectance meters. Differences in logbooks and memory reflectance meters ranged from 0 to 109 mg/dl. Three fourths of the subjects had reported lower than actual mean blood glucose values. Under-reporting, or omission of memory reflectance meter readings, averaged 10 percent, whereas overreporting or addition of phantom values averaged 40 percent. An average of 26 percent of the logbook entries were not identical to memory reflectance meter values determined at the corresponding time. Two thirds of the subjects had reported values in such a manner as to obscure hyper- and hypoglycemia, leading to misleading clinical impressions about the fluctuation in metabolic control. Previous glycemic control, patterns of logbook recording, or visits to the clinic were not found to be predictive of the reliability of patient self-monitoring regimens.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-217
Number of pages7
JournalThe American journal of medicine
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physiologic Monitoring
Blood Glucose
Diabetes Mellitus
Reading
Ambulatory Care
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Hypoglycemia
Hyperglycemia
Glucose

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Mazze, R. S., Shamoon, H., Pasmantier, R., Lucido, D., Murphy, J., Hartmann, K., ... Lopatin, W. (1984). Reliability of blood glucose monitoring by patients with diabetes mellitus. The American journal of medicine, 77(2), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(84)90693-4

Reliability of blood glucose monitoring by patients with diabetes mellitus. / Mazze, Roger S.; Shamoon, Harry; Pasmantier, Rosemarie; Lucido, David; Murphy, Joann; Hartmann, Klaus; Kuykendall, Victor; Lopatin, William.

In: The American journal of medicine, Vol. 77, No. 2, 1984, p. 211-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mazze, RS, Shamoon, H, Pasmantier, R, Lucido, D, Murphy, J, Hartmann, K, Kuykendall, V & Lopatin, W 1984, 'Reliability of blood glucose monitoring by patients with diabetes mellitus', The American journal of medicine, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(84)90693-4
Mazze, Roger S. ; Shamoon, Harry ; Pasmantier, Rosemarie ; Lucido, David ; Murphy, Joann ; Hartmann, Klaus ; Kuykendall, Victor ; Lopatin, William. / Reliability of blood glucose monitoring by patients with diabetes mellitus. In: The American journal of medicine. 1984 ; Vol. 77, No. 2. pp. 211-217.
@article{b7b42ae60f744c348a9683d0845ebe15,
title = "Reliability of blood glucose monitoring by patients with diabetes mellitus",
abstract = "Nineteen patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were evaluated for overall reliability of self-generated data from capillary blood glucose monitoring. For a period of 12 to 14 days, standard reflectance meters used by these subjects were replaced by meters internally modified with memory chips capable of storing all glucose readings by date and time. The subjects were not aware of this modification and were instructed to continue to test capillary blood glucose as they had been and to continue their practice of recording the meter readings in a logbook. To assess reliability of patientgenerated data as recorded in the logbook, the addition, deletion, and alteration of test results were determined. A significantly lower (p < 0.0001) mean blood glucose level was reported in the logbooks than recorded in the memory reflectance meters. Differences in logbooks and memory reflectance meters ranged from 0 to 109 mg/dl. Three fourths of the subjects had reported lower than actual mean blood glucose values. Under-reporting, or omission of memory reflectance meter readings, averaged 10 percent, whereas overreporting or addition of phantom values averaged 40 percent. An average of 26 percent of the logbook entries were not identical to memory reflectance meter values determined at the corresponding time. Two thirds of the subjects had reported values in such a manner as to obscure hyper- and hypoglycemia, leading to misleading clinical impressions about the fluctuation in metabolic control. Previous glycemic control, patterns of logbook recording, or visits to the clinic were not found to be predictive of the reliability of patient self-monitoring regimens.",
author = "Mazze, {Roger S.} and Harry Shamoon and Rosemarie Pasmantier and David Lucido and Joann Murphy and Klaus Hartmann and Victor Kuykendall and William Lopatin",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9343(84)90693-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "211--217",
journal = "American Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0002-9343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of blood glucose monitoring by patients with diabetes mellitus

AU - Mazze, Roger S.

AU - Shamoon, Harry

AU - Pasmantier, Rosemarie

AU - Lucido, David

AU - Murphy, Joann

AU - Hartmann, Klaus

AU - Kuykendall, Victor

AU - Lopatin, William

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Nineteen patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were evaluated for overall reliability of self-generated data from capillary blood glucose monitoring. For a period of 12 to 14 days, standard reflectance meters used by these subjects were replaced by meters internally modified with memory chips capable of storing all glucose readings by date and time. The subjects were not aware of this modification and were instructed to continue to test capillary blood glucose as they had been and to continue their practice of recording the meter readings in a logbook. To assess reliability of patientgenerated data as recorded in the logbook, the addition, deletion, and alteration of test results were determined. A significantly lower (p < 0.0001) mean blood glucose level was reported in the logbooks than recorded in the memory reflectance meters. Differences in logbooks and memory reflectance meters ranged from 0 to 109 mg/dl. Three fourths of the subjects had reported lower than actual mean blood glucose values. Under-reporting, or omission of memory reflectance meter readings, averaged 10 percent, whereas overreporting or addition of phantom values averaged 40 percent. An average of 26 percent of the logbook entries were not identical to memory reflectance meter values determined at the corresponding time. Two thirds of the subjects had reported values in such a manner as to obscure hyper- and hypoglycemia, leading to misleading clinical impressions about the fluctuation in metabolic control. Previous glycemic control, patterns of logbook recording, or visits to the clinic were not found to be predictive of the reliability of patient self-monitoring regimens.

AB - Nineteen patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were evaluated for overall reliability of self-generated data from capillary blood glucose monitoring. For a period of 12 to 14 days, standard reflectance meters used by these subjects were replaced by meters internally modified with memory chips capable of storing all glucose readings by date and time. The subjects were not aware of this modification and were instructed to continue to test capillary blood glucose as they had been and to continue their practice of recording the meter readings in a logbook. To assess reliability of patientgenerated data as recorded in the logbook, the addition, deletion, and alteration of test results were determined. A significantly lower (p < 0.0001) mean blood glucose level was reported in the logbooks than recorded in the memory reflectance meters. Differences in logbooks and memory reflectance meters ranged from 0 to 109 mg/dl. Three fourths of the subjects had reported lower than actual mean blood glucose values. Under-reporting, or omission of memory reflectance meter readings, averaged 10 percent, whereas overreporting or addition of phantom values averaged 40 percent. An average of 26 percent of the logbook entries were not identical to memory reflectance meter values determined at the corresponding time. Two thirds of the subjects had reported values in such a manner as to obscure hyper- and hypoglycemia, leading to misleading clinical impressions about the fluctuation in metabolic control. Previous glycemic control, patterns of logbook recording, or visits to the clinic were not found to be predictive of the reliability of patient self-monitoring regimens.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021152785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021152785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90693-4

DO - 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90693-4

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 211

EP - 217

JO - American Journal of Medicine

JF - American Journal of Medicine

SN - 0002-9343

IS - 2

ER -