Reliability and Clinical Utility of the CARDS Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Garret L. Sobol, Alan Hilibrand, Ashley Davis, Paul Millhouse, John Koerner, Christopher Kepler, Gregory D. Schroeder, Jonathan D. Krystal, Erik C. Olsson, Jeffrey Rihn, David Greg Anderson, Alexander Vaccaro, Kristen Radcliff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the reliability and clinical utility of the of the proposed CARDS classification for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Background: The Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification system was recently proposed as an alternative to the Meyerding system for classifying degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). Unlike Meyerding, CARDS considers other relevant radiographic findings such as disk space collapse and segmental kyphosis to stratify DS into 4 radiographically discreet types. Currently, no studies have been conducted to assess the clinical utility of the CARDS system. Methods: A total of 78 consecutive surgical patients with L4-L5 DS were rated as CARDS types A through D and Fleiss' κ for interobserver agreement was calculated. Then, demographics as well as preoperative and postoperative outcome scores (ODI, SF-12 mental and physical, VAS) were collected. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to detect significant differences amongst CARDS types. An unpaired t test was used to compare individual CARDS types with all other subtypes combined. Results: Grading showed: 4 type A, 19 type B, 45 type C, and 8 type D (k=0.63). There was a statistically significant difference in preoperative back pain (P=0.046) between groups. CARDS type D had the highest mean back pain scores (8.8) of all subtypes which was significantly higher than mean back pain for all other subtypes combined (P=0.016). CARDS D showed the largest degree of improvement in all outcome measures. There was a trend towards an increased improvement in ODI (P=0.074) and SF-12 MCS (P=0.095) in the CARDS D subtype relative to the rest of the cohort. Conclusions: The CARDS classification system represents a reliable method for classifying cases of DS. Our results indicate that kyphotic segmental alignment (CARDS D) may be a less common, yet clinically distinct subset of DS characterized by worse preoperative back pain. CARDS type D cases may also show a greater degree of improvement in multiple outcome measures following surgical intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E69-E73
JournalClinical spine surgery
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spondylolisthesis
Back Pain
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Kyphosis

Keywords

  • back pain
  • CARDS classification
  • degenerative spondylolisthesis
  • kyphosis
  • postoperative outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Sobol, G. L., Hilibrand, A., Davis, A., Millhouse, P., Koerner, J., Kepler, C., ... Radcliff, K. (2018). Reliability and Clinical Utility of the CARDS Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Clinical spine surgery, 31(1), E69-E73. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000571

Reliability and Clinical Utility of the CARDS Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. / Sobol, Garret L.; Hilibrand, Alan; Davis, Ashley; Millhouse, Paul; Koerner, John; Kepler, Christopher; Schroeder, Gregory D.; Krystal, Jonathan D.; Olsson, Erik C.; Rihn, Jeffrey; Anderson, David Greg; Vaccaro, Alexander; Radcliff, Kristen.

In: Clinical spine surgery, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. E69-E73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sobol, GL, Hilibrand, A, Davis, A, Millhouse, P, Koerner, J, Kepler, C, Schroeder, GD, Krystal, JD, Olsson, EC, Rihn, J, Anderson, DG, Vaccaro, A & Radcliff, K 2018, 'Reliability and Clinical Utility of the CARDS Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis', Clinical spine surgery, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. E69-E73. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000571
Sobol, Garret L. ; Hilibrand, Alan ; Davis, Ashley ; Millhouse, Paul ; Koerner, John ; Kepler, Christopher ; Schroeder, Gregory D. ; Krystal, Jonathan D. ; Olsson, Erik C. ; Rihn, Jeffrey ; Anderson, David Greg ; Vaccaro, Alexander ; Radcliff, Kristen. / Reliability and Clinical Utility of the CARDS Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. In: Clinical spine surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. E69-E73.
@article{514c81ed156a459bb0c9e930ce3a852d,
title = "Reliability and Clinical Utility of the CARDS Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis",
abstract = "Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the reliability and clinical utility of the of the proposed CARDS classification for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Background: The Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification system was recently proposed as an alternative to the Meyerding system for classifying degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). Unlike Meyerding, CARDS considers other relevant radiographic findings such as disk space collapse and segmental kyphosis to stratify DS into 4 radiographically discreet types. Currently, no studies have been conducted to assess the clinical utility of the CARDS system. Methods: A total of 78 consecutive surgical patients with L4-L5 DS were rated as CARDS types A through D and Fleiss' κ for interobserver agreement was calculated. Then, demographics as well as preoperative and postoperative outcome scores (ODI, SF-12 mental and physical, VAS) were collected. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to detect significant differences amongst CARDS types. An unpaired t test was used to compare individual CARDS types with all other subtypes combined. Results: Grading showed: 4 type A, 19 type B, 45 type C, and 8 type D (k=0.63). There was a statistically significant difference in preoperative back pain (P=0.046) between groups. CARDS type D had the highest mean back pain scores (8.8) of all subtypes which was significantly higher than mean back pain for all other subtypes combined (P=0.016). CARDS D showed the largest degree of improvement in all outcome measures. There was a trend towards an increased improvement in ODI (P=0.074) and SF-12 MCS (P=0.095) in the CARDS D subtype relative to the rest of the cohort. Conclusions: The CARDS classification system represents a reliable method for classifying cases of DS. Our results indicate that kyphotic segmental alignment (CARDS D) may be a less common, yet clinically distinct subset of DS characterized by worse preoperative back pain. CARDS type D cases may also show a greater degree of improvement in multiple outcome measures following surgical intervention.",
keywords = "back pain, CARDS classification, degenerative spondylolisthesis, kyphosis, postoperative outcomes",
author = "Sobol, {Garret L.} and Alan Hilibrand and Ashley Davis and Paul Millhouse and John Koerner and Christopher Kepler and Schroeder, {Gregory D.} and Krystal, {Jonathan D.} and Olsson, {Erik C.} and Jeffrey Rihn and Anderson, {David Greg} and Alexander Vaccaro and Kristen Radcliff",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BSD.0000000000000571",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "E69--E73",
journal = "Clinical Spine Surgery",
issn = "2380-0186",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and Clinical Utility of the CARDS Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

AU - Sobol, Garret L.

AU - Hilibrand, Alan

AU - Davis, Ashley

AU - Millhouse, Paul

AU - Koerner, John

AU - Kepler, Christopher

AU - Schroeder, Gregory D.

AU - Krystal, Jonathan D.

AU - Olsson, Erik C.

AU - Rihn, Jeffrey

AU - Anderson, David Greg

AU - Vaccaro, Alexander

AU - Radcliff, Kristen

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the reliability and clinical utility of the of the proposed CARDS classification for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Background: The Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification system was recently proposed as an alternative to the Meyerding system for classifying degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). Unlike Meyerding, CARDS considers other relevant radiographic findings such as disk space collapse and segmental kyphosis to stratify DS into 4 radiographically discreet types. Currently, no studies have been conducted to assess the clinical utility of the CARDS system. Methods: A total of 78 consecutive surgical patients with L4-L5 DS were rated as CARDS types A through D and Fleiss' κ for interobserver agreement was calculated. Then, demographics as well as preoperative and postoperative outcome scores (ODI, SF-12 mental and physical, VAS) were collected. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to detect significant differences amongst CARDS types. An unpaired t test was used to compare individual CARDS types with all other subtypes combined. Results: Grading showed: 4 type A, 19 type B, 45 type C, and 8 type D (k=0.63). There was a statistically significant difference in preoperative back pain (P=0.046) between groups. CARDS type D had the highest mean back pain scores (8.8) of all subtypes which was significantly higher than mean back pain for all other subtypes combined (P=0.016). CARDS D showed the largest degree of improvement in all outcome measures. There was a trend towards an increased improvement in ODI (P=0.074) and SF-12 MCS (P=0.095) in the CARDS D subtype relative to the rest of the cohort. Conclusions: The CARDS classification system represents a reliable method for classifying cases of DS. Our results indicate that kyphotic segmental alignment (CARDS D) may be a less common, yet clinically distinct subset of DS characterized by worse preoperative back pain. CARDS type D cases may also show a greater degree of improvement in multiple outcome measures following surgical intervention.

AB - Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the reliability and clinical utility of the of the proposed CARDS classification for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Background: The Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification system was recently proposed as an alternative to the Meyerding system for classifying degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). Unlike Meyerding, CARDS considers other relevant radiographic findings such as disk space collapse and segmental kyphosis to stratify DS into 4 radiographically discreet types. Currently, no studies have been conducted to assess the clinical utility of the CARDS system. Methods: A total of 78 consecutive surgical patients with L4-L5 DS were rated as CARDS types A through D and Fleiss' κ for interobserver agreement was calculated. Then, demographics as well as preoperative and postoperative outcome scores (ODI, SF-12 mental and physical, VAS) were collected. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to detect significant differences amongst CARDS types. An unpaired t test was used to compare individual CARDS types with all other subtypes combined. Results: Grading showed: 4 type A, 19 type B, 45 type C, and 8 type D (k=0.63). There was a statistically significant difference in preoperative back pain (P=0.046) between groups. CARDS type D had the highest mean back pain scores (8.8) of all subtypes which was significantly higher than mean back pain for all other subtypes combined (P=0.016). CARDS D showed the largest degree of improvement in all outcome measures. There was a trend towards an increased improvement in ODI (P=0.074) and SF-12 MCS (P=0.095) in the CARDS D subtype relative to the rest of the cohort. Conclusions: The CARDS classification system represents a reliable method for classifying cases of DS. Our results indicate that kyphotic segmental alignment (CARDS D) may be a less common, yet clinically distinct subset of DS characterized by worse preoperative back pain. CARDS type D cases may also show a greater degree of improvement in multiple outcome measures following surgical intervention.

KW - back pain

KW - CARDS classification

KW - degenerative spondylolisthesis

KW - kyphosis

KW - postoperative outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024474590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024474590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000571

DO - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000571

M3 - Article

C2 - 28719453

AN - SCOPUS:85024474590

VL - 31

SP - E69-E73

JO - Clinical Spine Surgery

JF - Clinical Spine Surgery

SN - 2380-0186

IS - 1

ER -