Relationship between body weight and the incidence of positive axillary nodes at mastectomy for breast cancer

Barnett Zumoff, Indira Dasgupta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The question, whether obesity is associated with an increased incidence of positive axillary nodes at mastectomy for breast cancer, was studied in two quite different hospital populations; one from a large urban teaching hospital (Montefiore) and one from a medium‐sized Air Force medical center (Malcolm Grow). In the Montefiore population, the answer was “yes”; 67% of the node‐positive patients, but only 31% of the nodenegative patients were obese (20% or more above ideal weight) (p < 0.05). In the Malcolm Grow population, the answer was “no”; 20% of the node‐positive and 20% of the node‐negative patients were obese. The different answers, we believe, are due to the biological differences between the populations; the Montefiore population was shorter (by an average of 1.7 inches), heavier (by an average of 20 lbs), and more obese. The incidence of obesity was about three times as high in the Montefiore population (52% versus 20%; p < 0.02) and it contained a statistically distinct subpopulation of obese patients, while the few obese patients in the Malcolm Grow population constituted merely the upper tail of a unimodal log‐normal distribution of weight in that population. We propose that it is possible to demonstrate a relationship of obesity to node‐positivity in the Montefiore population but not in the Malcolm Grow population because obesity was highly prevalent in the former and almost nonexistent in the latter. It seems self‐evident that it is not possible to demonstrate an effect of obesity in a population if that population manifests no significant obesity, statistically speaking, but disregarding this principle, we believe, may account for the controversy in the literature about whether obesity is a risk factor in breast cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-220
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mastectomy
Body Weight
Breast Neoplasms
Incidence
Population
Obesity
Weights and Measures
Urban Hospitals
Teaching Hospitals
Air

Keywords

  • axillary lymph nodes
  • breast cancer
  • obesity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)
  • Oncology

Cite this

Relationship between body weight and the incidence of positive axillary nodes at mastectomy for breast cancer. / Zumoff, Barnett; Dasgupta, Indira.

In: Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 22, No. 4, 04.1983, p. 217-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{05baa0f8def04608a6ba516a19a9d7d6,
title = "Relationship between body weight and the incidence of positive axillary nodes at mastectomy for breast cancer",
abstract = "The question, whether obesity is associated with an increased incidence of positive axillary nodes at mastectomy for breast cancer, was studied in two quite different hospital populations; one from a large urban teaching hospital (Montefiore) and one from a medium‐sized Air Force medical center (Malcolm Grow). In the Montefiore population, the answer was “yes”; 67{\%} of the node‐positive patients, but only 31{\%} of the nodenegative patients were obese (20{\%} or more above ideal weight) (p < 0.05). In the Malcolm Grow population, the answer was “no”; 20{\%} of the node‐positive and 20{\%} of the node‐negative patients were obese. The different answers, we believe, are due to the biological differences between the populations; the Montefiore population was shorter (by an average of 1.7 inches), heavier (by an average of 20 lbs), and more obese. The incidence of obesity was about three times as high in the Montefiore population (52{\%} versus 20{\%}; p < 0.02) and it contained a statistically distinct subpopulation of obese patients, while the few obese patients in the Malcolm Grow population constituted merely the upper tail of a unimodal log‐normal distribution of weight in that population. We propose that it is possible to demonstrate a relationship of obesity to node‐positivity in the Montefiore population but not in the Malcolm Grow population because obesity was highly prevalent in the former and almost nonexistent in the latter. It seems self‐evident that it is not possible to demonstrate an effect of obesity in a population if that population manifests no significant obesity, statistically speaking, but disregarding this principle, we believe, may account for the controversy in the literature about whether obesity is a risk factor in breast cancer.",
keywords = "axillary lymph nodes, breast cancer, obesity",
author = "Barnett Zumoff and Indira Dasgupta",
year = "1983",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1002/jso.2930220402",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "217--220",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "0022-4790",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between body weight and the incidence of positive axillary nodes at mastectomy for breast cancer

AU - Zumoff, Barnett

AU - Dasgupta, Indira

PY - 1983/4

Y1 - 1983/4

N2 - The question, whether obesity is associated with an increased incidence of positive axillary nodes at mastectomy for breast cancer, was studied in two quite different hospital populations; one from a large urban teaching hospital (Montefiore) and one from a medium‐sized Air Force medical center (Malcolm Grow). In the Montefiore population, the answer was “yes”; 67% of the node‐positive patients, but only 31% of the nodenegative patients were obese (20% or more above ideal weight) (p < 0.05). In the Malcolm Grow population, the answer was “no”; 20% of the node‐positive and 20% of the node‐negative patients were obese. The different answers, we believe, are due to the biological differences between the populations; the Montefiore population was shorter (by an average of 1.7 inches), heavier (by an average of 20 lbs), and more obese. The incidence of obesity was about three times as high in the Montefiore population (52% versus 20%; p < 0.02) and it contained a statistically distinct subpopulation of obese patients, while the few obese patients in the Malcolm Grow population constituted merely the upper tail of a unimodal log‐normal distribution of weight in that population. We propose that it is possible to demonstrate a relationship of obesity to node‐positivity in the Montefiore population but not in the Malcolm Grow population because obesity was highly prevalent in the former and almost nonexistent in the latter. It seems self‐evident that it is not possible to demonstrate an effect of obesity in a population if that population manifests no significant obesity, statistically speaking, but disregarding this principle, we believe, may account for the controversy in the literature about whether obesity is a risk factor in breast cancer.

AB - The question, whether obesity is associated with an increased incidence of positive axillary nodes at mastectomy for breast cancer, was studied in two quite different hospital populations; one from a large urban teaching hospital (Montefiore) and one from a medium‐sized Air Force medical center (Malcolm Grow). In the Montefiore population, the answer was “yes”; 67% of the node‐positive patients, but only 31% of the nodenegative patients were obese (20% or more above ideal weight) (p < 0.05). In the Malcolm Grow population, the answer was “no”; 20% of the node‐positive and 20% of the node‐negative patients were obese. The different answers, we believe, are due to the biological differences between the populations; the Montefiore population was shorter (by an average of 1.7 inches), heavier (by an average of 20 lbs), and more obese. The incidence of obesity was about three times as high in the Montefiore population (52% versus 20%; p < 0.02) and it contained a statistically distinct subpopulation of obese patients, while the few obese patients in the Malcolm Grow population constituted merely the upper tail of a unimodal log‐normal distribution of weight in that population. We propose that it is possible to demonstrate a relationship of obesity to node‐positivity in the Montefiore population but not in the Malcolm Grow population because obesity was highly prevalent in the former and almost nonexistent in the latter. It seems self‐evident that it is not possible to demonstrate an effect of obesity in a population if that population manifests no significant obesity, statistically speaking, but disregarding this principle, we believe, may account for the controversy in the literature about whether obesity is a risk factor in breast cancer.

KW - axillary lymph nodes

KW - breast cancer

KW - obesity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020622320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020622320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jso.2930220402

DO - 10.1002/jso.2930220402

M3 - Article

C2 - 6834841

AN - SCOPUS:0020622320

VL - 22

SP - 217

EP - 220

JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology

SN - 0022-4790

IS - 4

ER -