Relations of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry

The Strong Heart Study

Mary J. Roman, Peter M. Okin, Jorge Kizer, Elisa T. Lee, Barbara V. Howard, Richard B. Devereux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

160 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We previously demonstrated stronger relations of central vs. brachial blood pressure, particularly pulse pressure, to carotid artery hypertrophy and extent of atherosclerosis. Data regarding the relative impacts of central and brachial pressures on left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry are limited. Methods: Echocardiography and radial applanation tonometry were performed in American Indian participants in the 4th Strong Heart Study examination. Left ventricular mass was calculated using an anatomically validated formula and adjusted for height2.7. Brachial blood pressure was measured according to a standardized protocol. Central pressures were derived using a generalized transfer function. Results: Of 2585 participants in the analysis, 60% were women, 21% had diabetes and 33% were hypertensive; the mean age was 40 ± 17 years. All blood pressure variables were significantly related to left ventricular absolute and relative wall thicknesses and left ventricular mass index (all P < 0.001), with considerable variation in correlation coefficients (r = 0.135-0.432). Central and brachial systolic pressures were uniformly more strongly related to left ventricular wall thicknesses, diastolic diameter and mass index than their respective pulse pressures (all P < 0.005 by z statistics). Left ventricular relative wall thickness and mass index were more strongly related to central than brachial pressures. Conclusion: Left ventricular hypertrophy is more strongly related to systolic pressure than to pulse pressure. Furthermore central pressures are more strongly related than brachial pressures to concentric left ventricular geometry. These data suggest that absolute (systolic) pressure is more important in stimulating left ventricular hypertrophy and remodeling, whereas pulsatile stress (pulse pressure) is more important in causing vascular hypertrophy and atherosclerosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)384-388
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Hypertension
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
Arm
Blood Pressure
Pressure
Hypertrophy
Atherosclerosis
Ventricular Remodeling
North American Indians
Manometry
Carotid Arteries
Blood Vessels
Echocardiography

Keywords

  • Arterial stiffness
  • Blood pressure
  • Left ventricular hypertrophy
  • Pulse pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Relations of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry : The Strong Heart Study. / Roman, Mary J.; Okin, Peter M.; Kizer, Jorge; Lee, Elisa T.; Howard, Barbara V.; Devereux, Richard B.

In: Journal of Hypertension, Vol. 28, No. 2, 02.2010, p. 384-388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roman, Mary J. ; Okin, Peter M. ; Kizer, Jorge ; Lee, Elisa T. ; Howard, Barbara V. ; Devereux, Richard B. / Relations of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry : The Strong Heart Study. In: Journal of Hypertension. 2010 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 384-388.
@article{737c6450a4df47a7a0e1036e05116c46,
title = "Relations of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry: The Strong Heart Study",
abstract = "Objective: We previously demonstrated stronger relations of central vs. brachial blood pressure, particularly pulse pressure, to carotid artery hypertrophy and extent of atherosclerosis. Data regarding the relative impacts of central and brachial pressures on left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry are limited. Methods: Echocardiography and radial applanation tonometry were performed in American Indian participants in the 4th Strong Heart Study examination. Left ventricular mass was calculated using an anatomically validated formula and adjusted for height2.7. Brachial blood pressure was measured according to a standardized protocol. Central pressures were derived using a generalized transfer function. Results: Of 2585 participants in the analysis, 60{\%} were women, 21{\%} had diabetes and 33{\%} were hypertensive; the mean age was 40 ± 17 years. All blood pressure variables were significantly related to left ventricular absolute and relative wall thicknesses and left ventricular mass index (all P < 0.001), with considerable variation in correlation coefficients (r = 0.135-0.432). Central and brachial systolic pressures were uniformly more strongly related to left ventricular wall thicknesses, diastolic diameter and mass index than their respective pulse pressures (all P < 0.005 by z statistics). Left ventricular relative wall thickness and mass index were more strongly related to central than brachial pressures. Conclusion: Left ventricular hypertrophy is more strongly related to systolic pressure than to pulse pressure. Furthermore central pressures are more strongly related than brachial pressures to concentric left ventricular geometry. These data suggest that absolute (systolic) pressure is more important in stimulating left ventricular hypertrophy and remodeling, whereas pulsatile stress (pulse pressure) is more important in causing vascular hypertrophy and atherosclerosis.",
keywords = "Arterial stiffness, Blood pressure, Left ventricular hypertrophy, Pulse pressure",
author = "Roman, {Mary J.} and Okin, {Peter M.} and Jorge Kizer and Lee, {Elisa T.} and Howard, {Barbara V.} and Devereux, {Richard B.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/HJH.0b013e328333d228",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "384--388",
journal = "Journal of Hypertension",
issn = "0263-6352",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relations of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry

T2 - The Strong Heart Study

AU - Roman, Mary J.

AU - Okin, Peter M.

AU - Kizer, Jorge

AU - Lee, Elisa T.

AU - Howard, Barbara V.

AU - Devereux, Richard B.

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Objective: We previously demonstrated stronger relations of central vs. brachial blood pressure, particularly pulse pressure, to carotid artery hypertrophy and extent of atherosclerosis. Data regarding the relative impacts of central and brachial pressures on left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry are limited. Methods: Echocardiography and radial applanation tonometry were performed in American Indian participants in the 4th Strong Heart Study examination. Left ventricular mass was calculated using an anatomically validated formula and adjusted for height2.7. Brachial blood pressure was measured according to a standardized protocol. Central pressures were derived using a generalized transfer function. Results: Of 2585 participants in the analysis, 60% were women, 21% had diabetes and 33% were hypertensive; the mean age was 40 ± 17 years. All blood pressure variables were significantly related to left ventricular absolute and relative wall thicknesses and left ventricular mass index (all P < 0.001), with considerable variation in correlation coefficients (r = 0.135-0.432). Central and brachial systolic pressures were uniformly more strongly related to left ventricular wall thicknesses, diastolic diameter and mass index than their respective pulse pressures (all P < 0.005 by z statistics). Left ventricular relative wall thickness and mass index were more strongly related to central than brachial pressures. Conclusion: Left ventricular hypertrophy is more strongly related to systolic pressure than to pulse pressure. Furthermore central pressures are more strongly related than brachial pressures to concentric left ventricular geometry. These data suggest that absolute (systolic) pressure is more important in stimulating left ventricular hypertrophy and remodeling, whereas pulsatile stress (pulse pressure) is more important in causing vascular hypertrophy and atherosclerosis.

AB - Objective: We previously demonstrated stronger relations of central vs. brachial blood pressure, particularly pulse pressure, to carotid artery hypertrophy and extent of atherosclerosis. Data regarding the relative impacts of central and brachial pressures on left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry are limited. Methods: Echocardiography and radial applanation tonometry were performed in American Indian participants in the 4th Strong Heart Study examination. Left ventricular mass was calculated using an anatomically validated formula and adjusted for height2.7. Brachial blood pressure was measured according to a standardized protocol. Central pressures were derived using a generalized transfer function. Results: Of 2585 participants in the analysis, 60% were women, 21% had diabetes and 33% were hypertensive; the mean age was 40 ± 17 years. All blood pressure variables were significantly related to left ventricular absolute and relative wall thicknesses and left ventricular mass index (all P < 0.001), with considerable variation in correlation coefficients (r = 0.135-0.432). Central and brachial systolic pressures were uniformly more strongly related to left ventricular wall thicknesses, diastolic diameter and mass index than their respective pulse pressures (all P < 0.005 by z statistics). Left ventricular relative wall thickness and mass index were more strongly related to central than brachial pressures. Conclusion: Left ventricular hypertrophy is more strongly related to systolic pressure than to pulse pressure. Furthermore central pressures are more strongly related than brachial pressures to concentric left ventricular geometry. These data suggest that absolute (systolic) pressure is more important in stimulating left ventricular hypertrophy and remodeling, whereas pulsatile stress (pulse pressure) is more important in causing vascular hypertrophy and atherosclerosis.

KW - Arterial stiffness

KW - Blood pressure

KW - Left ventricular hypertrophy

KW - Pulse pressure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75149150830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75149150830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328333d228

DO - 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328333d228

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 384

EP - 388

JO - Journal of Hypertension

JF - Journal of Hypertension

SN - 0263-6352

IS - 2

ER -