TY - JOUR
T1 - Relation of Peripheral Venous Pressure to Central Venous Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure, Heart Transplant, and Left Ventricular Assist Device
AU - Vlismas, Peter P.
AU - Wiesenfeld, Elliot
AU - Oh, Kyung Taek
AU - Murthy, Sandhya
AU - Vukelic, Sasha
AU - Saeed, Omar
AU - Patel, Snehal
AU - Shin, Jooyoung J.
AU - Jorde, Ulrich P.
AU - Sims, Daniel B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Peripheral venous pressure (PVP) monitoring is a noninvasive method to assess volume status. We investigated the correlation between PVP and central venous pressure (CVP) in heart failure (HF), heart transplant (HTx), and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients undergoing right heart catheterization (RHC). A prospective, cross-sectional study examining PVP in 100 patients from October 2018 to January 2020 was conducted. The analysis included patients undergoing RHC admitted for HF, post-HTx monitoring, or LVAD hemodynamic testing. Sixty percent of patients had HF, 30% were HTx patients, and 10% were LVAD patients. The mean PVP was 9.4 ± 5.3 mm Hg, and the mean CVP was 9.2 ± 5.8 mm Hg. The PVP and CVP were found to be highly correlated (r = 0.93, p < 0.00001). High correlation was also noted when broken down by HF (r = 0.93, p < 0.00001), HTx (r = 0.93, p < 0.00001), and LVAD groups (r = 0.94, p < 0.00005). In conclusion, there is a high degree of correlation between PVP and CVP in HF, HTx, and LVAD patients. PVP measurements can be used as a rapid, reliable, noninvasive estimate of volume status in these patient populations.
AB - Peripheral venous pressure (PVP) monitoring is a noninvasive method to assess volume status. We investigated the correlation between PVP and central venous pressure (CVP) in heart failure (HF), heart transplant (HTx), and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients undergoing right heart catheterization (RHC). A prospective, cross-sectional study examining PVP in 100 patients from October 2018 to January 2020 was conducted. The analysis included patients undergoing RHC admitted for HF, post-HTx monitoring, or LVAD hemodynamic testing. Sixty percent of patients had HF, 30% were HTx patients, and 10% were LVAD patients. The mean PVP was 9.4 ± 5.3 mm Hg, and the mean CVP was 9.2 ± 5.8 mm Hg. The PVP and CVP were found to be highly correlated (r = 0.93, p < 0.00001). High correlation was also noted when broken down by HF (r = 0.93, p < 0.00001), HTx (r = 0.93, p < 0.00001), and LVAD groups (r = 0.94, p < 0.00005). In conclusion, there is a high degree of correlation between PVP and CVP in HF, HTx, and LVAD patients. PVP measurements can be used as a rapid, reliable, noninvasive estimate of volume status in these patient populations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094576954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094576954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.055
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.055
M3 - Article
C2 - 33058805
AN - SCOPUS:85094576954
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 138
SP - 80
EP - 84
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
ER -