Refining the utility and role of Frozen section in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resection

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Previous studies report high-accuracy rates for intraoperative frozen sections, but reliability of frozen sections in predicting the ultimate final margin status is unknown. We compared frozen and permanent reads to identify risk factors for overall discrepancies between intraoperative and final margin status. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Methods: Pathology reports of 437 surgical resections between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 253 cases, generating 1,109 individual specimens, met inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, treatment, recurrence, and survival, as well as pathology data pertaining to the specimen, were recorded. Results: Frozen read accuracy was 96.7% (83.1% sensitivity, 97.9% specificity) relative to permanent evaluation. However, 4.3% of cases had a final positive margin not detected by frozen section; 17.8% had a close margin not detected by frozen section. In eight of 11 cases with missed positive margins, the involved margin was never sampled intraoperatively. Cases where intraoperative margins were only taken from surrounding tissue had a higher risk of missing a close or positive final margin when compared to cases where some or all margins were taken from the specimen (odds ratio = 5.05, 95% confidence interval [2.31, 11.07], P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1768-1775
Number of pages8
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume126
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Keywords

  • carcinoma
  • Frozen sections/utilization
  • head and neck neoplasm/pathology
  • head and neck neoplasms/surgery
  • intraoperative care
  • squamous cell

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Refining the utility and role of Frozen section in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this