Refining the utility and role of Frozen section in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resection

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Previous studies report high-accuracy rates for intraoperative frozen sections, but reliability of frozen sections in predicting the ultimate final margin status is unknown. We compared frozen and permanent reads to identify risk factors for overall discrepancies between intraoperative and final margin status. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Methods: Pathology reports of 437 surgical resections between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 253 cases, generating 1,109 individual specimens, met inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, treatment, recurrence, and survival, as well as pathology data pertaining to the specimen, were recorded. Results: Frozen read accuracy was 96.7% (83.1% sensitivity, 97.9% specificity) relative to permanent evaluation. However, 4.3% of cases had a final positive margin not detected by frozen section; 17.8% had a close margin not detected by frozen section. In eight of 11 cases with missed positive margins, the involved margin was never sampled intraoperatively. Cases where intraoperative margins were only taken from surrounding tissue had a higher risk of missing a close or positive final margin when compared to cases where some or all margins were taken from the specimen (odds ratio = 5.05, 95% confidence interval [2.31, 11.07], P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1768-1775
Number of pages8
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume126
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Frozen Sections
Pathology
Retrospective Studies
Odds Ratio
Demography
Confidence Intervals
Recurrence
Sensitivity and Specificity
Survival
Carcinoma, squamous cell of head and neck
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • carcinoma
  • Frozen sections/utilization
  • head and neck neoplasm/pathology
  • head and neck neoplasms/surgery
  • intraoperative care
  • squamous cell

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Refining the utility and role of Frozen section in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resection. / Du, Eugenie; Ow, Thomas J.; Lo, Yungtai; Gersten, Adam J.; Schiff, Bradley A.; Tassler, Andrew B.; Smith, Richard V.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 126, No. 8, 01.08.2016, p. 1768-1775.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c163755e40054681a3da6f2df6366e9a,
title = "Refining the utility and role of Frozen section in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resection",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: Previous studies report high-accuracy rates for intraoperative frozen sections, but reliability of frozen sections in predicting the ultimate final margin status is unknown. We compared frozen and permanent reads to identify risk factors for overall discrepancies between intraoperative and final margin status. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Methods: Pathology reports of 437 surgical resections between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 253 cases, generating 1,109 individual specimens, met inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, treatment, recurrence, and survival, as well as pathology data pertaining to the specimen, were recorded. Results: Frozen read accuracy was 96.7{\%} (83.1{\%} sensitivity, 97.9{\%} specificity) relative to permanent evaluation. However, 4.3{\%} of cases had a final positive margin not detected by frozen section; 17.8{\%} had a close margin not detected by frozen section. In eight of 11 cases with missed positive margins, the involved margin was never sampled intraoperatively. Cases where intraoperative margins were only taken from surrounding tissue had a higher risk of missing a close or positive final margin when compared to cases where some or all margins were taken from the specimen (odds ratio = 5.05, 95{\%} confidence interval [2.31, 11.07], P",
keywords = "carcinoma, Frozen sections/utilization, head and neck neoplasm/pathology, head and neck neoplasms/surgery, intraoperative care, squamous cell",
author = "Eugenie Du and Ow, {Thomas J.} and Yungtai Lo and Gersten, {Adam J.} and Schiff, {Bradley A.} and Tassler, {Andrew B.} and Smith, {Richard V.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.25899",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "1768--1775",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refining the utility and role of Frozen section in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resection

AU - Du, Eugenie

AU - Ow, Thomas J.

AU - Lo, Yungtai

AU - Gersten, Adam J.

AU - Schiff, Bradley A.

AU - Tassler, Andrew B.

AU - Smith, Richard V.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: Previous studies report high-accuracy rates for intraoperative frozen sections, but reliability of frozen sections in predicting the ultimate final margin status is unknown. We compared frozen and permanent reads to identify risk factors for overall discrepancies between intraoperative and final margin status. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Methods: Pathology reports of 437 surgical resections between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 253 cases, generating 1,109 individual specimens, met inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, treatment, recurrence, and survival, as well as pathology data pertaining to the specimen, were recorded. Results: Frozen read accuracy was 96.7% (83.1% sensitivity, 97.9% specificity) relative to permanent evaluation. However, 4.3% of cases had a final positive margin not detected by frozen section; 17.8% had a close margin not detected by frozen section. In eight of 11 cases with missed positive margins, the involved margin was never sampled intraoperatively. Cases where intraoperative margins were only taken from surrounding tissue had a higher risk of missing a close or positive final margin when compared to cases where some or all margins were taken from the specimen (odds ratio = 5.05, 95% confidence interval [2.31, 11.07], P

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: Previous studies report high-accuracy rates for intraoperative frozen sections, but reliability of frozen sections in predicting the ultimate final margin status is unknown. We compared frozen and permanent reads to identify risk factors for overall discrepancies between intraoperative and final margin status. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Methods: Pathology reports of 437 surgical resections between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 253 cases, generating 1,109 individual specimens, met inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, treatment, recurrence, and survival, as well as pathology data pertaining to the specimen, were recorded. Results: Frozen read accuracy was 96.7% (83.1% sensitivity, 97.9% specificity) relative to permanent evaluation. However, 4.3% of cases had a final positive margin not detected by frozen section; 17.8% had a close margin not detected by frozen section. In eight of 11 cases with missed positive margins, the involved margin was never sampled intraoperatively. Cases where intraoperative margins were only taken from surrounding tissue had a higher risk of missing a close or positive final margin when compared to cases where some or all margins were taken from the specimen (odds ratio = 5.05, 95% confidence interval [2.31, 11.07], P

KW - carcinoma

KW - Frozen sections/utilization

KW - head and neck neoplasm/pathology

KW - head and neck neoplasms/surgery

KW - intraoperative care

KW - squamous cell

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978782740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978782740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.25899

DO - 10.1002/lary.25899

M3 - Article

C2 - 27113207

AN - SCOPUS:84978782740

VL - 126

SP - 1768

EP - 1775

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 8

ER -