TY - JOUR
T1 - Reengineering a radiology department in an academic institution
AU - Sprayregen, Seymour
AU - Amis, E. Stephen
AU - Wolf, Ellen L.
AU - Alaimo, Richard
PY - 1998/4
Y1 - 1998/4
N2 - OBJECTIVE. A 1-year program was undertaken in conjunction with an outside consultant to cut nonphysician labor expenses by 15%, cut nonlabor expenses by 10%, and improve all service parameters in an academic radiology department. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A steering committee decided on five major goal teams: improver report turnaround time and improve patient throughout, increase the efficiency of performance and improve the quality of radiologic examinations, decrease the cost of each examination, improve charge capture, and improve the perception of the department. The goal teams met at least every 2 weeks, made presentations to the steering committee at midyear, and were then disbanded. The steering committee implemented changes in the second half of the year and continues to meet every 2-weeks. Data were obtained from the radiology information system, financial statements, and surveys. RESULTS. In the first year, report turnaround time decreased from 157 hr to 83 hr (and to 46 hr at 2 years), the efficiency of performing examinations (according to our criteria) improved from 64% to 80%, the quality of examinations improved, labor costs were reduced by 5% (and by 11% at 2 years), nonlabor costs were reduced by 14% (and by 31% at 2 years), cost per examination was reduced by 10% and (and by 16% at 2 years), increased charged capture resulted in an annual increase in professional fees of at least $110,000, and the perception of the department by referring clinicians improved. CONCLUSION. It is possible to simultaneously cut expenses and improve service. To gauge progress, objective parameters that can be measured easily are necessary.
AB - OBJECTIVE. A 1-year program was undertaken in conjunction with an outside consultant to cut nonphysician labor expenses by 15%, cut nonlabor expenses by 10%, and improve all service parameters in an academic radiology department. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A steering committee decided on five major goal teams: improver report turnaround time and improve patient throughout, increase the efficiency of performance and improve the quality of radiologic examinations, decrease the cost of each examination, improve charge capture, and improve the perception of the department. The goal teams met at least every 2 weeks, made presentations to the steering committee at midyear, and were then disbanded. The steering committee implemented changes in the second half of the year and continues to meet every 2-weeks. Data were obtained from the radiology information system, financial statements, and surveys. RESULTS. In the first year, report turnaround time decreased from 157 hr to 83 hr (and to 46 hr at 2 years), the efficiency of performing examinations (according to our criteria) improved from 64% to 80%, the quality of examinations improved, labor costs were reduced by 5% (and by 11% at 2 years), nonlabor costs were reduced by 14% (and by 31% at 2 years), cost per examination was reduced by 10% and (and by 16% at 2 years), increased charged capture resulted in an annual increase in professional fees of at least $110,000, and the perception of the department by referring clinicians improved. CONCLUSION. It is possible to simultaneously cut expenses and improve service. To gauge progress, objective parameters that can be measured easily are necessary.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031920613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031920613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530022
DO - 10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530022
M3 - Article
C2 - 9530022
AN - SCOPUS:0031920613
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 170
SP - 851
EP - 857
JO - American Journal of Roentgenology
JF - American Journal of Roentgenology
IS - 4
ER -