Recognition memory as influenced by differential attention to semantic and acoustic properties of words

Greg Cermak, John Schnorr, Herman Buschke, R. C. Atkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lists of 264 words were studied by 75 Ss. The Ss were divided into three groups instructed to remember either meaning or sound or both meaning and sound of the study words. During recognition, S was required to indicate which word of each test pair had been presented earlier. The incorrect alternative for each test pair was a homophone, synonym, or a word unrelated to the correct choice. Recognition increased as instructional emphasis on remembering word meaning increased. Overall recognition was best when the incorrect choice was unrelated to the study word, and worst when the incorrect choice was a synonym of the study word. The high performance levels obtained under some conditions suggest that word features other than semantic and plume tic information are important for word recognition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-81
Number of pages3
JournalPsychonomic Science
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1970

Fingerprint

Acoustic properties
Semantics
Acoustic waves
Data storage equipment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Catalysis
  • Chemistry(all)

Cite this

Recognition memory as influenced by differential attention to semantic and acoustic properties of words. / Cermak, Greg; Schnorr, John; Buschke, Herman; Atkinson, R. C.

In: Psychonomic Science, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1970, p. 79-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{190089a973af42d78a324da11cd56051,
title = "Recognition memory as influenced by differential attention to semantic and acoustic properties of words",
abstract = "Lists of 264 words were studied by 75 Ss. The Ss were divided into three groups instructed to remember either meaning or sound or both meaning and sound of the study words. During recognition, S was required to indicate which word of each test pair had been presented earlier. The incorrect alternative for each test pair was a homophone, synonym, or a word unrelated to the correct choice. Recognition increased as instructional emphasis on remembering word meaning increased. Overall recognition was best when the incorrect choice was unrelated to the study word, and worst when the incorrect choice was a synonym of the study word. The high performance levels obtained under some conditions suggest that word features other than semantic and plume tic information are important for word recognition.",
author = "Greg Cermak and John Schnorr and Herman Buschke and Atkinson, {R. C.}",
year = "1970",
doi = "10.3758/BF03337430",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "79--81",
journal = "Psychonomic Science",
issn = "0033-3131",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recognition memory as influenced by differential attention to semantic and acoustic properties of words

AU - Cermak, Greg

AU - Schnorr, John

AU - Buschke, Herman

AU - Atkinson, R. C.

PY - 1970

Y1 - 1970

N2 - Lists of 264 words were studied by 75 Ss. The Ss were divided into three groups instructed to remember either meaning or sound or both meaning and sound of the study words. During recognition, S was required to indicate which word of each test pair had been presented earlier. The incorrect alternative for each test pair was a homophone, synonym, or a word unrelated to the correct choice. Recognition increased as instructional emphasis on remembering word meaning increased. Overall recognition was best when the incorrect choice was unrelated to the study word, and worst when the incorrect choice was a synonym of the study word. The high performance levels obtained under some conditions suggest that word features other than semantic and plume tic information are important for word recognition.

AB - Lists of 264 words were studied by 75 Ss. The Ss were divided into three groups instructed to remember either meaning or sound or both meaning and sound of the study words. During recognition, S was required to indicate which word of each test pair had been presented earlier. The incorrect alternative for each test pair was a homophone, synonym, or a word unrelated to the correct choice. Recognition increased as instructional emphasis on remembering word meaning increased. Overall recognition was best when the incorrect choice was unrelated to the study word, and worst when the incorrect choice was a synonym of the study word. The high performance levels obtained under some conditions suggest that word features other than semantic and plume tic information are important for word recognition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911674509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911674509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03337430

DO - 10.3758/BF03337430

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84911674509

VL - 19

SP - 79

EP - 81

JO - Psychonomic Science

JF - Psychonomic Science

SN - 0033-3131

IS - 2

ER -