@article{a71a7b48bf544fd8adacaf78dbe851a3,
title = "Reasons behind preferences for community-based continence promotion",
abstract = "Objectives This study aimed to understand the potential reach of continence promotion intervention formats among incontinent women. Methods The Survey of the Health of Wisconsin conducts household interviews on a population-based sample. In 2016, 399 adult women were asked about incontinence and likelihood of participation in continence promotion via 3 formats: single lecture, interactive 3-session workshop, or online. Descriptive analyses compared women likely versus unlikely to participate in continence promotion. To understand format preferences, modified grounded theory was used to conduct and analyze telephone interviews. Results One hundred eighty-seven (76%) of 246 incontinent women reported being likely to attend continence promotion: 111 (45%) for a single lecture, 43 (17%) for an interactive 3-session workshop, and 156 (64%) for an online program. Obesity, older age, nonwhite race, prior health program participation, and Internet use for health information were associated with reported continence promotion participation. Cited advantages of a single lecture included convenience and ability to ask questions. A workshop offered accountability, hands-on learning, and opportunity to learn from others; online format offered privacy, convenience, and self-directed learning. Conclusions Most incontinent women are willing to participate in continence promotion, especially online.",
keywords = "dissemination and implementation, epidemiology, health promotion, incontinence, public health",
author = "Brown, {Heidi W.} and Wise, {Meg E.} and Lecaire, {Tamara J.} and Braun, {Emilie J.} and Drewry, {Anna M.} and Buttigieg, {Emily M.} and Maria Macco and Barnet, {Jodi H.} and Andrew Bersch and Peppard, {Paul E.} and Malecki, {Kristen M.C.} and Nieto, {F. Javier} and Mahoney, {Jane E.}",
note = "Funding Information: From the *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; †Sonderegger Research Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin – Madison; ‡Survey of the Health of Wisconsin, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; §College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR; and ||Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI. Correspondence: Heidi W. Brown, MD, MAS. E‐mail: hwbrown2@wisc.edu. The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest. Funding for this study was provided by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K12 DK100022) and the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Population Health Sciences. Funding for the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin was provided by the Wisconsin Partnership Program PERC Award (233 PRJ 25DJ), the National Institutes of Health{\textquoteright}s Clinical and Translational Science Award (5UL RR025011), and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (1 RC2 HL101468). Supplemental digital contents are available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal{\textquoteright}s Web site (www.fpmrs.net). Copyright {\textcopyright} 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000806 Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SPV.0000000000000806",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "425--430",
journal = "Journal of Pelvic Surgery",
issn = "2151-8378",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",
}