Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: Cluster randomised controlled trial

Allen J. Dietrich, Thomas E. Oxman, John W. Williams, Herbert C. Schulberg, Martha L. Bruce, Pamela W. Lee, Sheila Barry, Patrick J. Raue, Jean J. Lefever, Moonseong Heo, Kathryn Rost, Kurt Kroenke, Martha Gerrity, Paul A. Nutting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

234 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To test the effectiveness of an evidence based model for management of depression in primary care with support from quality improvement resources. Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting: Five healthcare organisations in the United States and 60 affiliated practices. Patients: 405 patients, aged ≥ 18 years, starting or changing treatment for depression. Intervention: Care provided by clinicians, with staff providing telephone support under supervision from a psychiatrist. Main outcome measures: Severity of depression at three and six months (Hopkins symptom checklist-20): response to treatment (≥ 50% decrease in scores) and remission (score of < 0.5). Results: At six months, 60% (106 of 177) of patients in intervention practices had responded to treatment compared with 47% (68 of 146) of patients in usual care practices (P = 0.02). At six months, 37% of intervention patients showed remission compared with 27% for usual care patients (P = 0.014). 90% of intervention patients rated their depression care as good or excellent at six months compared with 75% of usual care patients (P = 0.0003). Conclusion: Resources such as quality improvement programmes can be used effectively in primary care to implement evidence based management of depression and improve outcomes for patients with depression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)602-605
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume329
Issue number7466
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 11 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Randomized Controlled Trials
Depression
Quality Improvement
Therapeutics
Patient Care
Checklist
Telephone
Psychiatry
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Dietrich, A. J., Oxman, T. E., Williams, J. W., Schulberg, H. C., Bruce, M. L., Lee, P. W., ... Nutting, P. A. (2004). Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: Cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 329(7466), 602-605. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38219.481250.55

Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care : Cluster randomised controlled trial. / Dietrich, Allen J.; Oxman, Thomas E.; Williams, John W.; Schulberg, Herbert C.; Bruce, Martha L.; Lee, Pamela W.; Barry, Sheila; Raue, Patrick J.; Lefever, Jean J.; Heo, Moonseong; Rost, Kathryn; Kroenke, Kurt; Gerrity, Martha; Nutting, Paul A.

In: British Medical Journal, Vol. 329, No. 7466, 11.09.2004, p. 602-605.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dietrich, AJ, Oxman, TE, Williams, JW, Schulberg, HC, Bruce, ML, Lee, PW, Barry, S, Raue, PJ, Lefever, JJ, Heo, M, Rost, K, Kroenke, K, Gerrity, M & Nutting, PA 2004, 'Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: Cluster randomised controlled trial', British Medical Journal, vol. 329, no. 7466, pp. 602-605. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38219.481250.55
Dietrich, Allen J. ; Oxman, Thomas E. ; Williams, John W. ; Schulberg, Herbert C. ; Bruce, Martha L. ; Lee, Pamela W. ; Barry, Sheila ; Raue, Patrick J. ; Lefever, Jean J. ; Heo, Moonseong ; Rost, Kathryn ; Kroenke, Kurt ; Gerrity, Martha ; Nutting, Paul A. / Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care : Cluster randomised controlled trial. In: British Medical Journal. 2004 ; Vol. 329, No. 7466. pp. 602-605.
@article{da40d7fae1254bc19092653be0e58724,
title = "Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: Cluster randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective: To test the effectiveness of an evidence based model for management of depression in primary care with support from quality improvement resources. Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting: Five healthcare organisations in the United States and 60 affiliated practices. Patients: 405 patients, aged ≥ 18 years, starting or changing treatment for depression. Intervention: Care provided by clinicians, with staff providing telephone support under supervision from a psychiatrist. Main outcome measures: Severity of depression at three and six months (Hopkins symptom checklist-20): response to treatment (≥ 50{\%} decrease in scores) and remission (score of < 0.5). Results: At six months, 60{\%} (106 of 177) of patients in intervention practices had responded to treatment compared with 47{\%} (68 of 146) of patients in usual care practices (P = 0.02). At six months, 37{\%} of intervention patients showed remission compared with 27{\%} for usual care patients (P = 0.014). 90{\%} of intervention patients rated their depression care as good or excellent at six months compared with 75{\%} of usual care patients (P = 0.0003). Conclusion: Resources such as quality improvement programmes can be used effectively in primary care to implement evidence based management of depression and improve outcomes for patients with depression.",
author = "Dietrich, {Allen J.} and Oxman, {Thomas E.} and Williams, {John W.} and Schulberg, {Herbert C.} and Bruce, {Martha L.} and Lee, {Pamela W.} and Sheila Barry and Raue, {Patrick J.} and Lefever, {Jean J.} and Moonseong Heo and Kathryn Rost and Kurt Kroenke and Martha Gerrity and Nutting, {Paul A.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1136/bmj.38219.481250.55",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "329",
pages = "602--605",
journal = "BMJ (Online)",
issn = "0959-8146",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7466",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care

T2 - Cluster randomised controlled trial

AU - Dietrich, Allen J.

AU - Oxman, Thomas E.

AU - Williams, John W.

AU - Schulberg, Herbert C.

AU - Bruce, Martha L.

AU - Lee, Pamela W.

AU - Barry, Sheila

AU - Raue, Patrick J.

AU - Lefever, Jean J.

AU - Heo, Moonseong

AU - Rost, Kathryn

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

AU - Gerrity, Martha

AU - Nutting, Paul A.

PY - 2004/9/11

Y1 - 2004/9/11

N2 - Objective: To test the effectiveness of an evidence based model for management of depression in primary care with support from quality improvement resources. Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting: Five healthcare organisations in the United States and 60 affiliated practices. Patients: 405 patients, aged ≥ 18 years, starting or changing treatment for depression. Intervention: Care provided by clinicians, with staff providing telephone support under supervision from a psychiatrist. Main outcome measures: Severity of depression at three and six months (Hopkins symptom checklist-20): response to treatment (≥ 50% decrease in scores) and remission (score of < 0.5). Results: At six months, 60% (106 of 177) of patients in intervention practices had responded to treatment compared with 47% (68 of 146) of patients in usual care practices (P = 0.02). At six months, 37% of intervention patients showed remission compared with 27% for usual care patients (P = 0.014). 90% of intervention patients rated their depression care as good or excellent at six months compared with 75% of usual care patients (P = 0.0003). Conclusion: Resources such as quality improvement programmes can be used effectively in primary care to implement evidence based management of depression and improve outcomes for patients with depression.

AB - Objective: To test the effectiveness of an evidence based model for management of depression in primary care with support from quality improvement resources. Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting: Five healthcare organisations in the United States and 60 affiliated practices. Patients: 405 patients, aged ≥ 18 years, starting or changing treatment for depression. Intervention: Care provided by clinicians, with staff providing telephone support under supervision from a psychiatrist. Main outcome measures: Severity of depression at three and six months (Hopkins symptom checklist-20): response to treatment (≥ 50% decrease in scores) and remission (score of < 0.5). Results: At six months, 60% (106 of 177) of patients in intervention practices had responded to treatment compared with 47% (68 of 146) of patients in usual care practices (P = 0.02). At six months, 37% of intervention patients showed remission compared with 27% for usual care patients (P = 0.014). 90% of intervention patients rated their depression care as good or excellent at six months compared with 75% of usual care patients (P = 0.0003). Conclusion: Resources such as quality improvement programmes can be used effectively in primary care to implement evidence based management of depression and improve outcomes for patients with depression.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4544222914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4544222914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.38219.481250.55

DO - 10.1136/bmj.38219.481250.55

M3 - Article

C2 - 15345600

AN - SCOPUS:4544222914

VL - 329

SP - 602

EP - 605

JO - BMJ (Online)

JF - BMJ (Online)

SN - 0959-8146

IS - 7466

ER -