TY - JOUR
T1 - Rates of Response to Atogepant for Migraine Prophylaxis among Adults
T2 - A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Lipton, Richard B.
AU - Pozo-Rosich, Patricia
AU - Blumenfeld, Andrew M.
AU - Dodick, David W.
AU - McAllister, Peter
AU - Li, Ye
AU - Lu, Kaifeng
AU - Dabruzzo, Brett
AU - Miceli, Rosa
AU - Severt, Lawrence
AU - Finnegan, Michelle
AU - Trugman, Joel M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Montefiore Headache Center, Bronx, New York (Lipton); Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain (Pozo-Rosich); Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (Pozo-Rosich); The San Diego Headache Center and The Los Angeles Headache Center, Carlsbad, California (Blumenfeld); Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (Dodick); New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, Connecticut (McAllister); AbbVie, Madison, New Jersey (Li, Lu, Dabruzzo, Miceli, Severt, Finnegan, Trugman). Author Contributions: Dr Trugman had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: Lipton, Blumenfeld, Lu, Miceli, Severt, Finnegan, Trugman. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors. Drafting of the manuscript: Lipton, Lu, Dabruzzo, Miceli. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors. Statistical analysis: Li, Lu. Administrative, technical, or material support: McAllister, Miceli, Severt. Supervision: Lipton, Pozo-Rosich, Dabruzzo, Severt, Finnegan. Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lipton reported receiving personal fees for study design, data analysis, and attending advisory board service from Allergan/AbbVie during the conduct of the study and grants and nonfinancial support from Allergan/AbbVie, grants and personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Eli Lilly, grants, personal fees, and stocks/stock options from Biohaven, grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from Impel, grants from BioDelivery Sciences International, grants and personal fees from Teva, stock options and grants from Manistee, and stock options from Ctrl M Health outside the submitted work. Dr Pozo-Rosich reported receiving personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees and grants from Novartis, personal fees and grants from Teva Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Lundbeck, personal fees from Medscape, and grants from AbbVie outside the submitted work. Dr Blumenfeld reported receiving speaking and consulting fees from Allergan/AbbVie outside the submitted work and performing promotional speaking and consulting for Allergan and AbbVie. Dr Dodick reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, CapiThera, Ceruvia Lifesciences, Cerecin, Cooltech, AbbVie, Allergan, Ctrl M Health, Biohaven, Novartis, Lundbeck, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Impel, Theranica, Satsuma, WL Gore, Genentech, Perfood, Praxis, Nocira, Pfizer, Revance, AYYA Biosciences, Eli Lilly, Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, American Academy of Neurology, Headache Cooperative of the Pacific, MF Medical Education Research, Biopharm Communications, CEA Group Holding Company (Clinical Education Alliance LLC), Teva, Amgen, Lundbeck, Vector Psychometric Group, Wolters
Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This study was sponsored by Allergan (before its acquisition by AbbVie).
Funding Information:
Additional Contributions: Writing and editorial assistance was provided to the authors by Lela Creutz, PhD, and Dennis Stancavish, MA, Peloton Advantage LLC, an OPEN Health company, Parsippany, New Jersey, and was funded by AbbVie.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/6/8
Y1 - 2022/6/8
N2 - Importance: Some patients with migraine, particularly those in primary care, require effective, well-tolerated, migraine-specific oral preventive treatments. Objective: To examine the efficacy of atogepant, an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, using 4 levels of mean monthly migraine-day (MMD) responder rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of atogepant for the preventive treatment of migraine from December 14, 2018, to June 19, 2020, in adults with 4 to 14 migraine-days per month at 128 sites in the US. Interventions: Patients were administered 10 mg of atogepant (n = 222), 30 mg of atogepant (n = 230), 60 mg of atogepant (n = 235), or placebo (n = 223) once daily in a 1:1:1:1 ratio for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: These analyses evaluated treatment responder rates, defined as participants achieving 50% or greater (α-controlled, secondary end point) and 25% or greater, 75% or greater, and 100% (prespecified additional end points) reductions in mean MMDs during the 12-week blinded treatment period. Results: Of 902 participants (mean [SD] age, 41.6 [12.3] years; 801 [88.8%] female; 752 [83.4%] White; 825 [91.5%] non-Hispanic), 873 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (placebo, 214; 10 mg of atogepant, 214; 30 mg of atogepant, 223; and 60 mg of atogepant, 222). For the secondary end point, a 50% or greater reduction in the 12-week mean of MMDs was achieved by 119 of 214 participants (55.6%) treated with 10 mg of atogepant (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 2.1-4.6), 131 of 223 participants (58.7%) treated with 30 mg atogepant (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.4-5.3), 135 of 222 participants (60.8%) treated with 60 mg of atogepant (odds ratio, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.6-5.7), and 62 of 214 participants (29.0%) given placebo (P <.001). The numbers of participants who reported a 25% or greater reduction in the 12-week mean of MMDs were 157 of 214 (73.4%) for 10 mg of atogepant, 172 of 223 (77.1%) for 30 mg of atogepant, and 180 of 222 (81.1%) for 60 mg of atogepant vs 126 of 214 (58.9%) for placebo (P <.002). The numbers of participants who reported a 75% or greater reduction in mean MMDs were 65 of 214 (30.4%) for 10 mg of atogepant, 66 of 223 (29.6%) for 30 mg of atogepant, and 84 of 222 (37.8%) for 60 mg of atogepant compared with 23 of 214 (10.7%) for placebo (P <.001). The numbers of participants reporting 100% reduction in mean MMDs were 17 of 214 (7.9%) for 10 mg of atogepant (P =.004), 11 of 223 (4.9%) for 30 mg of atogepant (P =.02), and 17 of 222 (7.7%) for 60 mg of atogepant (P =.003) compared with 2 of 214 (0.9%) for placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: At all doses, atogepant was effective during the 12-week double-blind treatment period beginning in the first 4 weeks, as evidenced by significant reductions in mean MMDs at every responder threshold level. Higher atogepant doses appeared to produce the greatest responder rates, which can guide clinicians in individualizing starting doses. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03777059.
AB - Importance: Some patients with migraine, particularly those in primary care, require effective, well-tolerated, migraine-specific oral preventive treatments. Objective: To examine the efficacy of atogepant, an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, using 4 levels of mean monthly migraine-day (MMD) responder rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of atogepant for the preventive treatment of migraine from December 14, 2018, to June 19, 2020, in adults with 4 to 14 migraine-days per month at 128 sites in the US. Interventions: Patients were administered 10 mg of atogepant (n = 222), 30 mg of atogepant (n = 230), 60 mg of atogepant (n = 235), or placebo (n = 223) once daily in a 1:1:1:1 ratio for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: These analyses evaluated treatment responder rates, defined as participants achieving 50% or greater (α-controlled, secondary end point) and 25% or greater, 75% or greater, and 100% (prespecified additional end points) reductions in mean MMDs during the 12-week blinded treatment period. Results: Of 902 participants (mean [SD] age, 41.6 [12.3] years; 801 [88.8%] female; 752 [83.4%] White; 825 [91.5%] non-Hispanic), 873 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (placebo, 214; 10 mg of atogepant, 214; 30 mg of atogepant, 223; and 60 mg of atogepant, 222). For the secondary end point, a 50% or greater reduction in the 12-week mean of MMDs was achieved by 119 of 214 participants (55.6%) treated with 10 mg of atogepant (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 2.1-4.6), 131 of 223 participants (58.7%) treated with 30 mg atogepant (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.4-5.3), 135 of 222 participants (60.8%) treated with 60 mg of atogepant (odds ratio, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.6-5.7), and 62 of 214 participants (29.0%) given placebo (P <.001). The numbers of participants who reported a 25% or greater reduction in the 12-week mean of MMDs were 157 of 214 (73.4%) for 10 mg of atogepant, 172 of 223 (77.1%) for 30 mg of atogepant, and 180 of 222 (81.1%) for 60 mg of atogepant vs 126 of 214 (58.9%) for placebo (P <.002). The numbers of participants who reported a 75% or greater reduction in mean MMDs were 65 of 214 (30.4%) for 10 mg of atogepant, 66 of 223 (29.6%) for 30 mg of atogepant, and 84 of 222 (37.8%) for 60 mg of atogepant compared with 23 of 214 (10.7%) for placebo (P <.001). The numbers of participants reporting 100% reduction in mean MMDs were 17 of 214 (7.9%) for 10 mg of atogepant (P =.004), 11 of 223 (4.9%) for 30 mg of atogepant (P =.02), and 17 of 222 (7.7%) for 60 mg of atogepant (P =.003) compared with 2 of 214 (0.9%) for placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: At all doses, atogepant was effective during the 12-week double-blind treatment period beginning in the first 4 weeks, as evidenced by significant reductions in mean MMDs at every responder threshold level. Higher atogepant doses appeared to produce the greatest responder rates, which can guide clinicians in individualizing starting doses. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03777059.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131772065&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131772065&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15499
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15499
M3 - Article
C2 - 35675076
AN - SCOPUS:85131772065
SN - 2574-3805
VL - 5
SP - E2215499
JO - JAMA network open
JF - JAMA network open
IS - 6
ER -