Radiation Exposure From Medical Imaging in Patients With Chronic and Recurrent Conditions

Evan G. Stein, Linda B. Haramati, Eran Bellin, Lori Ashton, Gus Mitsopoulos, Alan Schoenfeld, E. Stephen Amis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Advances in medical imaging have been associated with increased utilization and increased radiation exposure, especially for patients with chronic and recurrent conditions. The authors estimated the cumulative radiation doses from medical imaging for specific cohorts with chronic and recurrent conditions. Methods: All patients diagnosed with hydrocephalus (n = 1,711), pulmonary thromboembolic disease (n = 3,220), renal colic (n = 5,855), and cardiac disease (n = 11,072) from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2005, were retrospectively identified. Each imaging examination that used ionizing radiation from 2000 to 2008 was incorporated into an estimate of total effective dose and organ-specific doses. Patients with high levels of radiation exposure after 3 years (total effective dose > 50 mSv; dose to the ocular lens > 150 mSv) were identified. Results: The mean estimated effective doses for the surviving diagnostic cohorts after 3 years were 12.3 mSv for patients with hydrocephalus, 21.7 mSv for those with pulmonary thromboembolic disease, 18.7 mSv for those with renal colic, and 14.0 mSv for those with cardiac disease. Among patients with hydrocephalus, 26.3% (339 of 1,291) had radiation doses > 150 mSv to the ocular lens within 3 years. In all cohorts, the proportion of patients with total effective doses > 50 mSv within 3 years was significantly higher for those diagnosed in 2004 and 2005 than for those diagnosed in 2000 and 2001. Conclusion: Patients with hydrocephalus, pulmonary thromboembolic disease, renal colic, and cardiac disease received radiation exposures that may put them at increased risk for cancer. Moreover, the proportion who received estimated total effective doses > 50 mSv within 3 years was significantly higher for those diagnosed most recently. It is the responsibility of institutions and physicians to critically evaluate their infrastructures, diagnostic strategies, and imaging techniques for each individual patient, with an eye toward minimizing cumulative medical radiation exposure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)351-359
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Medical imaging
  • radiation exposure
  • radiation safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this