Quantitative assessment of gray-level perception

Observers' accuracy is dependent on density differences

M. Smith-Levitin, I. Blickstein, A. A. Albrecht-Shach, R. D. Goldman, Edith D. Gurewitsch Allen, J. Streltzoff, F. A. Chervenak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sonographic image density represents tissue echogenicity, or the acoustic nature of scanned tissue. It has the potential to distinguish normal from abnormal tissue. Humans are poor assessors of tissue echogenicity, yet their abilities have not been quantitatively compared to more objective methods. We compared the accuracy of image density differentiation by the human eye and by densitometry in the fetal liver model. A group of 60 observers was asked to compare the echogenicity of three pairs of images of a fetal liver. Twenty-three repeated the comparison several weeks later. Image density was measured by electro-optical densitometry. The two-tailed signed rank test was used to compare the observer's perceptions with the density values and the repeated observations with the original responses. The density of each fetal liver image in pair A was the same. Image B1 had a 12.3% lower density than image B2, and image C1 had a 6.3% greater density than image C2. Observers were accurate more often when comparing images with large density differences (pair B) than they were when comparing images with the same density (pair A) or with small density differences (pair C). Accuracy was not related to being medically qualified or from an obstetric or gynecological department. Intraobserver variation was not significant. We conclude that the human eye is extremely inaccurate at discerning differences in echogenicity when images have small or no differences in optical density. Densitometry is, therefore, indispensable for accurate image density assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)346-349
Number of pages4
JournalUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Densitometry
Liver
Aptitude
Observer Variation
Acoustics
Obstetrics
liver
rank tests
optical density
acoustics

Keywords

  • Echogenicity
  • Image density
  • Observer variation
  • Ultrasound densitometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Quantitative assessment of gray-level perception : Observers' accuracy is dependent on density differences. / Smith-Levitin, M.; Blickstein, I.; Albrecht-Shach, A. A.; Goldman, R. D.; Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D.; Streltzoff, J.; Chervenak, F. A.

In: Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 10, No. 5, 01.12.1997, p. 346-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith-Levitin, M. ; Blickstein, I. ; Albrecht-Shach, A. A. ; Goldman, R. D. ; Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D. ; Streltzoff, J. ; Chervenak, F. A. / Quantitative assessment of gray-level perception : Observers' accuracy is dependent on density differences. In: Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1997 ; Vol. 10, No. 5. pp. 346-349.
@article{28f86d4b7a98431aa50787e6539599c0,
title = "Quantitative assessment of gray-level perception: Observers' accuracy is dependent on density differences",
abstract = "Sonographic image density represents tissue echogenicity, or the acoustic nature of scanned tissue. It has the potential to distinguish normal from abnormal tissue. Humans are poor assessors of tissue echogenicity, yet their abilities have not been quantitatively compared to more objective methods. We compared the accuracy of image density differentiation by the human eye and by densitometry in the fetal liver model. A group of 60 observers was asked to compare the echogenicity of three pairs of images of a fetal liver. Twenty-three repeated the comparison several weeks later. Image density was measured by electro-optical densitometry. The two-tailed signed rank test was used to compare the observer's perceptions with the density values and the repeated observations with the original responses. The density of each fetal liver image in pair A was the same. Image B1 had a 12.3{\%} lower density than image B2, and image C1 had a 6.3{\%} greater density than image C2. Observers were accurate more often when comparing images with large density differences (pair B) than they were when comparing images with the same density (pair A) or with small density differences (pair C). Accuracy was not related to being medically qualified or from an obstetric or gynecological department. Intraobserver variation was not significant. We conclude that the human eye is extremely inaccurate at discerning differences in echogenicity when images have small or no differences in optical density. Densitometry is, therefore, indispensable for accurate image density assessment.",
keywords = "Echogenicity, Image density, Observer variation, Ultrasound densitometry",
author = "M. Smith-Levitin and I. Blickstein and Albrecht-Shach, {A. A.} and Goldman, {R. D.} and {Gurewitsch Allen}, {Edith D.} and J. Streltzoff and Chervenak, {F. A.}",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10050346.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "346--349",
journal = "Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0960-7692",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative assessment of gray-level perception

T2 - Observers' accuracy is dependent on density differences

AU - Smith-Levitin, M.

AU - Blickstein, I.

AU - Albrecht-Shach, A. A.

AU - Goldman, R. D.

AU - Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D.

AU - Streltzoff, J.

AU - Chervenak, F. A.

PY - 1997/12/1

Y1 - 1997/12/1

N2 - Sonographic image density represents tissue echogenicity, or the acoustic nature of scanned tissue. It has the potential to distinguish normal from abnormal tissue. Humans are poor assessors of tissue echogenicity, yet their abilities have not been quantitatively compared to more objective methods. We compared the accuracy of image density differentiation by the human eye and by densitometry in the fetal liver model. A group of 60 observers was asked to compare the echogenicity of three pairs of images of a fetal liver. Twenty-three repeated the comparison several weeks later. Image density was measured by electro-optical densitometry. The two-tailed signed rank test was used to compare the observer's perceptions with the density values and the repeated observations with the original responses. The density of each fetal liver image in pair A was the same. Image B1 had a 12.3% lower density than image B2, and image C1 had a 6.3% greater density than image C2. Observers were accurate more often when comparing images with large density differences (pair B) than they were when comparing images with the same density (pair A) or with small density differences (pair C). Accuracy was not related to being medically qualified or from an obstetric or gynecological department. Intraobserver variation was not significant. We conclude that the human eye is extremely inaccurate at discerning differences in echogenicity when images have small or no differences in optical density. Densitometry is, therefore, indispensable for accurate image density assessment.

AB - Sonographic image density represents tissue echogenicity, or the acoustic nature of scanned tissue. It has the potential to distinguish normal from abnormal tissue. Humans are poor assessors of tissue echogenicity, yet their abilities have not been quantitatively compared to more objective methods. We compared the accuracy of image density differentiation by the human eye and by densitometry in the fetal liver model. A group of 60 observers was asked to compare the echogenicity of three pairs of images of a fetal liver. Twenty-three repeated the comparison several weeks later. Image density was measured by electro-optical densitometry. The two-tailed signed rank test was used to compare the observer's perceptions with the density values and the repeated observations with the original responses. The density of each fetal liver image in pair A was the same. Image B1 had a 12.3% lower density than image B2, and image C1 had a 6.3% greater density than image C2. Observers were accurate more often when comparing images with large density differences (pair B) than they were when comparing images with the same density (pair A) or with small density differences (pair C). Accuracy was not related to being medically qualified or from an obstetric or gynecological department. Intraobserver variation was not significant. We conclude that the human eye is extremely inaccurate at discerning differences in echogenicity when images have small or no differences in optical density. Densitometry is, therefore, indispensable for accurate image density assessment.

KW - Echogenicity

KW - Image density

KW - Observer variation

KW - Ultrasound densitometry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031457458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031457458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10050346.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10050346.x

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 346

EP - 349

JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0960-7692

IS - 5

ER -