Quality of care in pediatrics and health disparities: The increasing role of quality improvement science

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Despite well documented disparities in health and health care, little is known about what types of interventions have the potential to ameliorate disparities [1]. Many clinical providers, organizations, and policy makers do not know where and how to target efforts towards addressing disparities. Innovate approaches are needed to address health disparities and ensure that every child has access to high quality care. Quality improvement (QI) provides one such approach given its demonstrated effectiveness in improving general outcomes in the health care setting. QI can be defined as “a multidisciplinary, systems-focused, data driven method of understanding and improving the efficiency, effectiveness, and reliability of health processes and outcomes of care” [2]. It consists of continuous actions that aim to measurably improve health care services and the health status of targeted patient groups by improving uptake of evidence-based, best practices into clinical care [3]. Multiple QI frameworks exist [2]. Example approaches include Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA), Total Quality Management (TQM), Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI), Business Process Reengineering (BPR), rapid cycle change, lean thinking, Six Sigma, and Focus, Analyze, Develop, Execute/Evaluate (FADE). Although the evidence isn’t clear on which specific approach works best, all of these models are effective in elucidating a health care organization’s current state, determining areas for improvement, designing and implementing a sequential and iterative strategy to achieve improvement, and subsequently collecting data to monitor progress and adjust the strategy as indicated over time [4, 5]. The ongoing process of QI requires four elements: performance goals, performance measures, QI practices, and feedback and reporting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSpringerBriefs in Public Health
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages11-23
Number of pages13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Publication series

NameSpringerBriefs in Public Health
ISSN (Print)2192-3698
ISSN (Electronic)2192-3701

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Quality Improvement
Pediatrics
Health
Total Quality Management
Delivery of Health Care
Organizations
Evidence-Based Practice
Administrative Personnel
Practice Guidelines
Information Systems
Health Status
Health Services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health Informatics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Raphael, J. L., Faro, E. Z., & Oyeku, S. O. B. (2018). Quality of care in pediatrics and health disparities: The increasing role of quality improvement science. In SpringerBriefs in Public Health (pp. 11-23). (SpringerBriefs in Public Health). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03210-4_2

Quality of care in pediatrics and health disparities : The increasing role of quality improvement science. / Raphael, Jean L.; Faro, Elissa Z.; Oyeku, Suzette Olu Busola.

SpringerBriefs in Public Health. Springer International Publishing, 2018. p. 11-23 (SpringerBriefs in Public Health).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Raphael, JL, Faro, EZ & Oyeku, SOB 2018, Quality of care in pediatrics and health disparities: The increasing role of quality improvement science. in SpringerBriefs in Public Health. SpringerBriefs in Public Health, Springer International Publishing, pp. 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03210-4_2
Raphael JL, Faro EZ, Oyeku SOB. Quality of care in pediatrics and health disparities: The increasing role of quality improvement science. In SpringerBriefs in Public Health. Springer International Publishing. 2018. p. 11-23. (SpringerBriefs in Public Health). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03210-4_2
Raphael, Jean L. ; Faro, Elissa Z. ; Oyeku, Suzette Olu Busola. / Quality of care in pediatrics and health disparities : The increasing role of quality improvement science. SpringerBriefs in Public Health. Springer International Publishing, 2018. pp. 11-23 (SpringerBriefs in Public Health).
@inbook{d0e85795a2f04f368d869125ddc526d0,
title = "Quality of care in pediatrics and health disparities: The increasing role of quality improvement science",
abstract = "Despite well documented disparities in health and health care, little is known about what types of interventions have the potential to ameliorate disparities [1]. Many clinical providers, organizations, and policy makers do not know where and how to target efforts towards addressing disparities. Innovate approaches are needed to address health disparities and ensure that every child has access to high quality care. Quality improvement (QI) provides one such approach given its demonstrated effectiveness in improving general outcomes in the health care setting. QI can be defined as “a multidisciplinary, systems-focused, data driven method of understanding and improving the efficiency, effectiveness, and reliability of health processes and outcomes of care” [2]. It consists of continuous actions that aim to measurably improve health care services and the health status of targeted patient groups by improving uptake of evidence-based, best practices into clinical care [3]. Multiple QI frameworks exist [2]. Example approaches include Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA), Total Quality Management (TQM), Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI), Business Process Reengineering (BPR), rapid cycle change, lean thinking, Six Sigma, and Focus, Analyze, Develop, Execute/Evaluate (FADE). Although the evidence isn’t clear on which specific approach works best, all of these models are effective in elucidating a health care organization’s current state, determining areas for improvement, designing and implementing a sequential and iterative strategy to achieve improvement, and subsequently collecting data to monitor progress and adjust the strategy as indicated over time [4, 5]. The ongoing process of QI requires four elements: performance goals, performance measures, QI practices, and feedback and reporting.",
author = "Raphael, {Jean L.} and Faro, {Elissa Z.} and Oyeku, {Suzette Olu Busola}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-03210-4_2",
language = "English (US)",
series = "SpringerBriefs in Public Health",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",
pages = "11--23",
booktitle = "SpringerBriefs in Public Health",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Quality of care in pediatrics and health disparities

T2 - The increasing role of quality improvement science

AU - Raphael, Jean L.

AU - Faro, Elissa Z.

AU - Oyeku, Suzette Olu Busola

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Despite well documented disparities in health and health care, little is known about what types of interventions have the potential to ameliorate disparities [1]. Many clinical providers, organizations, and policy makers do not know where and how to target efforts towards addressing disparities. Innovate approaches are needed to address health disparities and ensure that every child has access to high quality care. Quality improvement (QI) provides one such approach given its demonstrated effectiveness in improving general outcomes in the health care setting. QI can be defined as “a multidisciplinary, systems-focused, data driven method of understanding and improving the efficiency, effectiveness, and reliability of health processes and outcomes of care” [2]. It consists of continuous actions that aim to measurably improve health care services and the health status of targeted patient groups by improving uptake of evidence-based, best practices into clinical care [3]. Multiple QI frameworks exist [2]. Example approaches include Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA), Total Quality Management (TQM), Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI), Business Process Reengineering (BPR), rapid cycle change, lean thinking, Six Sigma, and Focus, Analyze, Develop, Execute/Evaluate (FADE). Although the evidence isn’t clear on which specific approach works best, all of these models are effective in elucidating a health care organization’s current state, determining areas for improvement, designing and implementing a sequential and iterative strategy to achieve improvement, and subsequently collecting data to monitor progress and adjust the strategy as indicated over time [4, 5]. The ongoing process of QI requires four elements: performance goals, performance measures, QI practices, and feedback and reporting.

AB - Despite well documented disparities in health and health care, little is known about what types of interventions have the potential to ameliorate disparities [1]. Many clinical providers, organizations, and policy makers do not know where and how to target efforts towards addressing disparities. Innovate approaches are needed to address health disparities and ensure that every child has access to high quality care. Quality improvement (QI) provides one such approach given its demonstrated effectiveness in improving general outcomes in the health care setting. QI can be defined as “a multidisciplinary, systems-focused, data driven method of understanding and improving the efficiency, effectiveness, and reliability of health processes and outcomes of care” [2]. It consists of continuous actions that aim to measurably improve health care services and the health status of targeted patient groups by improving uptake of evidence-based, best practices into clinical care [3]. Multiple QI frameworks exist [2]. Example approaches include Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA), Total Quality Management (TQM), Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI), Business Process Reengineering (BPR), rapid cycle change, lean thinking, Six Sigma, and Focus, Analyze, Develop, Execute/Evaluate (FADE). Although the evidence isn’t clear on which specific approach works best, all of these models are effective in elucidating a health care organization’s current state, determining areas for improvement, designing and implementing a sequential and iterative strategy to achieve improvement, and subsequently collecting data to monitor progress and adjust the strategy as indicated over time [4, 5]. The ongoing process of QI requires four elements: performance goals, performance measures, QI practices, and feedback and reporting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059001139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059001139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-03210-4_2

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-03210-4_2

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85059001139

T3 - SpringerBriefs in Public Health

SP - 11

EP - 23

BT - SpringerBriefs in Public Health

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -