Pullout strengths of sacral and vaginal attachment sites in cadavers

George Lazarou, Richard J. Scotti, Magdy S. Mikhail, Ta Wei Chu, Ling Tung, Todd R. Olson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to test the pullout strengths of the vaginal and sacral attachment sites commonly used in sacrocolpopexy and sacrospinous ligament fixation, on fixed cadavers, using a precision biomechanical measuring device (load cell). Methods: Fifteen fixed, postmenopausal, female cadavers were dissected exposing the sacrospinous ligaments by layered dissections. Of the 15 cadavers, 10 were available for dissection of the presacral fascia. We exposed and sequentially tested the anterior longitudinal ligament and fascia over the sacral promontory, S1, S2, and S3 as well as the apical vagina. A 30-1b. force gauge transducer was used to measure the breaking force strengths of the structures tested Results: The mean pullout strengths at the attachment sites were: 33.2 ± 2.1 lbs at the sacral promontory, 23.4 ± 5.6 lbs at S1, 16.7 ± 8.5 lbs at S2, 10.5 ± 8.3 lbs at S3, and 27.1 ± 3.2 lbs at the sacrospinous ligament, whereas the mean pullout strength at the apical vaginal was 18.4 ± 5.3 lbs (P[r] <0.001) Conclusions: The pullout strength was the strongest at the sacral promontory. The breaking force progressively decreased distally along the sacral segments. The pullout strength of the sacral promontory was statistically stronger than the sacrospinous ligament, whereas the pullout strength at S3 was weaker than the sacrospinous ligament (P[r] <0.005).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-212
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Cadaver
Ligaments
Fascia
Dissection
Longitudinal Ligaments
Vagina
Transducers
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Apical vagina
  • Pullout strength
  • Sacral segments
  • Sacrocolpopexy
  • Sacrospinous ligament fixation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Lazarou, G., Scotti, R. J., Mikhail, M. S., Chu, T. W., Tung, L., & Olson, T. R. (2004). Pullout strengths of sacral and vaginal attachment sites in cadavers. Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery, 10(4), 209-212. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.spv.0000131923.34744.c2

Pullout strengths of sacral and vaginal attachment sites in cadavers. / Lazarou, George; Scotti, Richard J.; Mikhail, Magdy S.; Chu, Ta Wei; Tung, Ling; Olson, Todd R.

In: Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2004, p. 209-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lazarou, G, Scotti, RJ, Mikhail, MS, Chu, TW, Tung, L & Olson, TR 2004, 'Pullout strengths of sacral and vaginal attachment sites in cadavers', Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 209-212. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.spv.0000131923.34744.c2
Lazarou, George ; Scotti, Richard J. ; Mikhail, Magdy S. ; Chu, Ta Wei ; Tung, Ling ; Olson, Todd R. / Pullout strengths of sacral and vaginal attachment sites in cadavers. In: Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery. 2004 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 209-212.
@article{bfd68a83af644a06865c8844de05844c,
title = "Pullout strengths of sacral and vaginal attachment sites in cadavers",
abstract = "Objectives: The aim of the study was to test the pullout strengths of the vaginal and sacral attachment sites commonly used in sacrocolpopexy and sacrospinous ligament fixation, on fixed cadavers, using a precision biomechanical measuring device (load cell). Methods: Fifteen fixed, postmenopausal, female cadavers were dissected exposing the sacrospinous ligaments by layered dissections. Of the 15 cadavers, 10 were available for dissection of the presacral fascia. We exposed and sequentially tested the anterior longitudinal ligament and fascia over the sacral promontory, S1, S2, and S3 as well as the apical vagina. A 30-1b. force gauge transducer was used to measure the breaking force strengths of the structures tested Results: The mean pullout strengths at the attachment sites were: 33.2 ± 2.1 lbs at the sacral promontory, 23.4 ± 5.6 lbs at S1, 16.7 ± 8.5 lbs at S2, 10.5 ± 8.3 lbs at S3, and 27.1 ± 3.2 lbs at the sacrospinous ligament, whereas the mean pullout strength at the apical vaginal was 18.4 ± 5.3 lbs (P[r] <0.001) Conclusions: The pullout strength was the strongest at the sacral promontory. The breaking force progressively decreased distally along the sacral segments. The pullout strength of the sacral promontory was statistically stronger than the sacrospinous ligament, whereas the pullout strength at S3 was weaker than the sacrospinous ligament (P[r] <0.005).",
keywords = "Apical vagina, Pullout strength, Sacral segments, Sacrocolpopexy, Sacrospinous ligament fixation",
author = "George Lazarou and Scotti, {Richard J.} and Mikhail, {Magdy S.} and Chu, {Ta Wei} and Ling Tung and Olson, {Todd R.}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1097/01.spv.0000131923.34744.c2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "209--212",
journal = "Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "2151-8378",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pullout strengths of sacral and vaginal attachment sites in cadavers

AU - Lazarou, George

AU - Scotti, Richard J.

AU - Mikhail, Magdy S.

AU - Chu, Ta Wei

AU - Tung, Ling

AU - Olson, Todd R.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Objectives: The aim of the study was to test the pullout strengths of the vaginal and sacral attachment sites commonly used in sacrocolpopexy and sacrospinous ligament fixation, on fixed cadavers, using a precision biomechanical measuring device (load cell). Methods: Fifteen fixed, postmenopausal, female cadavers were dissected exposing the sacrospinous ligaments by layered dissections. Of the 15 cadavers, 10 were available for dissection of the presacral fascia. We exposed and sequentially tested the anterior longitudinal ligament and fascia over the sacral promontory, S1, S2, and S3 as well as the apical vagina. A 30-1b. force gauge transducer was used to measure the breaking force strengths of the structures tested Results: The mean pullout strengths at the attachment sites were: 33.2 ± 2.1 lbs at the sacral promontory, 23.4 ± 5.6 lbs at S1, 16.7 ± 8.5 lbs at S2, 10.5 ± 8.3 lbs at S3, and 27.1 ± 3.2 lbs at the sacrospinous ligament, whereas the mean pullout strength at the apical vaginal was 18.4 ± 5.3 lbs (P[r] <0.001) Conclusions: The pullout strength was the strongest at the sacral promontory. The breaking force progressively decreased distally along the sacral segments. The pullout strength of the sacral promontory was statistically stronger than the sacrospinous ligament, whereas the pullout strength at S3 was weaker than the sacrospinous ligament (P[r] <0.005).

AB - Objectives: The aim of the study was to test the pullout strengths of the vaginal and sacral attachment sites commonly used in sacrocolpopexy and sacrospinous ligament fixation, on fixed cadavers, using a precision biomechanical measuring device (load cell). Methods: Fifteen fixed, postmenopausal, female cadavers were dissected exposing the sacrospinous ligaments by layered dissections. Of the 15 cadavers, 10 were available for dissection of the presacral fascia. We exposed and sequentially tested the anterior longitudinal ligament and fascia over the sacral promontory, S1, S2, and S3 as well as the apical vagina. A 30-1b. force gauge transducer was used to measure the breaking force strengths of the structures tested Results: The mean pullout strengths at the attachment sites were: 33.2 ± 2.1 lbs at the sacral promontory, 23.4 ± 5.6 lbs at S1, 16.7 ± 8.5 lbs at S2, 10.5 ± 8.3 lbs at S3, and 27.1 ± 3.2 lbs at the sacrospinous ligament, whereas the mean pullout strength at the apical vaginal was 18.4 ± 5.3 lbs (P[r] <0.001) Conclusions: The pullout strength was the strongest at the sacral promontory. The breaking force progressively decreased distally along the sacral segments. The pullout strength of the sacral promontory was statistically stronger than the sacrospinous ligament, whereas the pullout strength at S3 was weaker than the sacrospinous ligament (P[r] <0.005).

KW - Apical vagina

KW - Pullout strength

KW - Sacral segments

KW - Sacrocolpopexy

KW - Sacrospinous ligament fixation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344618955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344618955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.spv.0000131923.34744.c2

DO - 10.1097/01.spv.0000131923.34744.c2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4344618955

VL - 10

SP - 209

EP - 212

JO - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 2151-8378

IS - 4

ER -