Psychotherapy for medically ill patients

Review and critique of controlled studies

H. R. Conte, T. B. Karasu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors summarize and evaluate the findings of 18 controlled studies of the use of dyadic and group therapy as primary or adjunctive treatment for patients with peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, functional abdominal disorders, asthma, migraine, skin disease, cardiovascular disease, or essential hypertension. The evidence suggests that some significant gains are achieved when psychotherapy is added to routine medical regimens. Of the 13 studies whose designs were termed 'adequate' or 'good', eight showed greater physiologic improvement for patients receiving psychotherapy than for those receiving medical treatment alone. In the remaining five of the 13 studies, psychotherapy produced no significant physiologic differences between experimental and control groups. Refinements in methodology and standardization of therapeutic intervention will contribute to greater specificity in further research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)285-315
Number of pages31
JournalPsychosomatics
Volume22
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1981

Fingerprint

Psychotherapy
Group Psychotherapy
Peptic Ulcer
Migraine Disorders
Ulcerative Colitis
Skin Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Therapeutics
Asthma
Control Groups
Research
Controlled
Essential Hypertension
Cardiovascular Disease
Functional Disorders
Methodology
Group Therapy
Medical Treatment
Control Group
Experimental Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Psychotherapy for medically ill patients : Review and critique of controlled studies. / Conte, H. R.; Karasu, T. B.

In: Psychosomatics, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1981, p. 285-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Conte, H. R. ; Karasu, T. B. / Psychotherapy for medically ill patients : Review and critique of controlled studies. In: Psychosomatics. 1981 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 285-315.
@article{88fa55ccb6a74797842db7c3785c2a7f,
title = "Psychotherapy for medically ill patients: Review and critique of controlled studies",
abstract = "The authors summarize and evaluate the findings of 18 controlled studies of the use of dyadic and group therapy as primary or adjunctive treatment for patients with peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, functional abdominal disorders, asthma, migraine, skin disease, cardiovascular disease, or essential hypertension. The evidence suggests that some significant gains are achieved when psychotherapy is added to routine medical regimens. Of the 13 studies whose designs were termed 'adequate' or 'good', eight showed greater physiologic improvement for patients receiving psychotherapy than for those receiving medical treatment alone. In the remaining five of the 13 studies, psychotherapy produced no significant physiologic differences between experimental and control groups. Refinements in methodology and standardization of therapeutic intervention will contribute to greater specificity in further research.",
author = "Conte, {H. R.} and Karasu, {T. B.}",
year = "1981",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "285--315",
journal = "Psychosomatics",
issn = "0033-3182",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychotherapy for medically ill patients

T2 - Review and critique of controlled studies

AU - Conte, H. R.

AU - Karasu, T. B.

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - The authors summarize and evaluate the findings of 18 controlled studies of the use of dyadic and group therapy as primary or adjunctive treatment for patients with peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, functional abdominal disorders, asthma, migraine, skin disease, cardiovascular disease, or essential hypertension. The evidence suggests that some significant gains are achieved when psychotherapy is added to routine medical regimens. Of the 13 studies whose designs were termed 'adequate' or 'good', eight showed greater physiologic improvement for patients receiving psychotherapy than for those receiving medical treatment alone. In the remaining five of the 13 studies, psychotherapy produced no significant physiologic differences between experimental and control groups. Refinements in methodology and standardization of therapeutic intervention will contribute to greater specificity in further research.

AB - The authors summarize and evaluate the findings of 18 controlled studies of the use of dyadic and group therapy as primary or adjunctive treatment for patients with peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, functional abdominal disorders, asthma, migraine, skin disease, cardiovascular disease, or essential hypertension. The evidence suggests that some significant gains are achieved when psychotherapy is added to routine medical regimens. Of the 13 studies whose designs were termed 'adequate' or 'good', eight showed greater physiologic improvement for patients receiving psychotherapy than for those receiving medical treatment alone. In the remaining five of the 13 studies, psychotherapy produced no significant physiologic differences between experimental and control groups. Refinements in methodology and standardization of therapeutic intervention will contribute to greater specificity in further research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019450740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019450740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 285

EP - 315

JO - Psychosomatics

JF - Psychosomatics

SN - 0033-3182

IS - 4

ER -