Psychometric validation of the identity abuse scale among LGBTQ individuals

Jillian R. Scheer, Julie M. Woulfe, Lisa A. Goodman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Identity abuse (IA) comprises a set of abuse tactics that exploit discriminatory systems including homophobia, biphobia, and transphobia (Tesch & Berkerian, 2015). This study examined the factorial validity of the IA Scale (Woulfe & Goodman, 2018) with a large independent sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals. Participants included 1,049 LGBTQ-identified participants (Mage = 27.3, 71.9% White, 52.6% cisgender women, and 18.7% as other nonheterosexual identity in their sexual orientation), recruited through listservs. Participants completed an online survey measuring past-year and adult exposure to identity, physical, and psychological abuse. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the measurement model had good fit to the data, and strong factor loadings were found across the seven items, confirming a unidimensional factor structure. Findings demonstrate the IA Scale's validity and reliability, supporting its use to assess the frequency of IA tactics experienced within intimate partnerships among LGBTQ individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Community Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Transgender Persons
Psychometrics
Homophobia
Sexual Minorities
Reproducibility of Results
Sexual Behavior
Statistical Factor Analysis
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Psychometric validation of the identity abuse scale among LGBTQ individuals. / Scheer, Jillian R.; Woulfe, Julie M.; Goodman, Lisa A.

In: Journal of Community Psychology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b02bd186a0f4ec994061c8a695f22c7,
title = "Psychometric validation of the identity abuse scale among LGBTQ individuals",
abstract = "Identity abuse (IA) comprises a set of abuse tactics that exploit discriminatory systems including homophobia, biphobia, and transphobia (Tesch & Berkerian, 2015). This study examined the factorial validity of the IA Scale (Woulfe & Goodman, 2018) with a large independent sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals. Participants included 1,049 LGBTQ-identified participants (Mage = 27.3, 71.9{\%} White, 52.6{\%} cisgender women, and 18.7{\%} as other nonheterosexual identity in their sexual orientation), recruited through listservs. Participants completed an online survey measuring past-year and adult exposure to identity, physical, and psychological abuse. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the measurement model had good fit to the data, and strong factor loadings were found across the seven items, confirming a unidimensional factor structure. Findings demonstrate the IA Scale's validity and reliability, supporting its use to assess the frequency of IA tactics experienced within intimate partnerships among LGBTQ individuals.",
author = "Scheer, {Jillian R.} and Woulfe, {Julie M.} and Goodman, {Lisa A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jcop.22126",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0090-4392",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric validation of the identity abuse scale among LGBTQ individuals

AU - Scheer, Jillian R.

AU - Woulfe, Julie M.

AU - Goodman, Lisa A.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Identity abuse (IA) comprises a set of abuse tactics that exploit discriminatory systems including homophobia, biphobia, and transphobia (Tesch & Berkerian, 2015). This study examined the factorial validity of the IA Scale (Woulfe & Goodman, 2018) with a large independent sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals. Participants included 1,049 LGBTQ-identified participants (Mage = 27.3, 71.9% White, 52.6% cisgender women, and 18.7% as other nonheterosexual identity in their sexual orientation), recruited through listservs. Participants completed an online survey measuring past-year and adult exposure to identity, physical, and psychological abuse. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the measurement model had good fit to the data, and strong factor loadings were found across the seven items, confirming a unidimensional factor structure. Findings demonstrate the IA Scale's validity and reliability, supporting its use to assess the frequency of IA tactics experienced within intimate partnerships among LGBTQ individuals.

AB - Identity abuse (IA) comprises a set of abuse tactics that exploit discriminatory systems including homophobia, biphobia, and transphobia (Tesch & Berkerian, 2015). This study examined the factorial validity of the IA Scale (Woulfe & Goodman, 2018) with a large independent sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals. Participants included 1,049 LGBTQ-identified participants (Mage = 27.3, 71.9% White, 52.6% cisgender women, and 18.7% as other nonheterosexual identity in their sexual orientation), recruited through listservs. Participants completed an online survey measuring past-year and adult exposure to identity, physical, and psychological abuse. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the measurement model had good fit to the data, and strong factor loadings were found across the seven items, confirming a unidimensional factor structure. Findings demonstrate the IA Scale's validity and reliability, supporting its use to assess the frequency of IA tactics experienced within intimate partnerships among LGBTQ individuals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053537236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053537236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jcop.22126

DO - 10.1002/jcop.22126

M3 - Article

C2 - 30207588

AN - SCOPUS:85053537236

JO - Journal of Community Psychology

JF - Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0090-4392

ER -