Prospective Analysis of Payment per Hour in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Fiscally Feasible or Futile?

Benjamin D. Smith, Ashley R. Chandler, Anthony Braswell, Denis Knobel, Brian T. Andrews, Nicholas Bastidas, Katie E. Weichman, Victor A. Moon, Armen K. Kasabian, Neil Tanna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The authors assess the fiscal viability of complex head and neck reconstructive surgery by evaluating its financial reimbursement in the setting of resources used. Methods: The authors prospectively assessed provider reimbursement for consecutive patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction. Total care time was determined by adding 15 minutes to the operative time for each postoperative hospital day and each postoperative follow-up appointment within the 90-day global period. Physician reimbursement was divided by total care time hours to determine an hourly rate of reimbursement. A control group of patients undergoing carpal tunnel release was evaluated using the same methods described. Results: A total of 50 patients met the inclusion criteria for study. The payer was Medicaid for nine patients (18 percent), Medicare for 19 patients (38 percent), and commercial for 22 patients (44 percent). The average provider revenue per case was $3241.01 ± $2500.65. For all patients, the mean operative time was 10.6 ± 3.87 hours and the mean number of postoperative hospital days was 15.1 ± 8.06. The mean reimbursement per total care time hour was $254 ± $199.87. Statistical analysis demonstrated difference in reimbursement per total care time hour when grouped by insurance type (p = 0.002) or flap type (p = 0.033). Of the 50 most recent patients to undergo carpal tunnel release, the average revenue per case was $785.27. Conclusion: Total care time analysis demonstrates that physician reimbursement is not commensurate with resources used for complex head and neck reconstructive surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)980-984
Number of pages5
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume137
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neck
Head
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Operative Time
Wrist
Physicians
Medicaid
Medicare
Insurance
Appointments and Schedules
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Smith, B. D., Chandler, A. R., Braswell, A., Knobel, D., Andrews, B. T., Bastidas, N., ... Tanna, N. (2016). Prospective Analysis of Payment per Hour in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Fiscally Feasible or Futile? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 137(3), 980-984. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000475828.94283.b2

Prospective Analysis of Payment per Hour in Head and Neck Reconstruction : Fiscally Feasible or Futile? / Smith, Benjamin D.; Chandler, Ashley R.; Braswell, Anthony; Knobel, Denis; Andrews, Brian T.; Bastidas, Nicholas; Weichman, Katie E.; Moon, Victor A.; Kasabian, Armen K.; Tanna, Neil.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 137, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 980-984.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, BD, Chandler, AR, Braswell, A, Knobel, D, Andrews, BT, Bastidas, N, Weichman, KE, Moon, VA, Kasabian, AK & Tanna, N 2016, 'Prospective Analysis of Payment per Hour in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Fiscally Feasible or Futile?', Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 980-984. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000475828.94283.b2
Smith, Benjamin D. ; Chandler, Ashley R. ; Braswell, Anthony ; Knobel, Denis ; Andrews, Brian T. ; Bastidas, Nicholas ; Weichman, Katie E. ; Moon, Victor A. ; Kasabian, Armen K. ; Tanna, Neil. / Prospective Analysis of Payment per Hour in Head and Neck Reconstruction : Fiscally Feasible or Futile?. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 137, No. 3. pp. 980-984.
@article{d88a094ebd0d4d7d8cb9b22ae6767eab,
title = "Prospective Analysis of Payment per Hour in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Fiscally Feasible or Futile?",
abstract = "Background: The authors assess the fiscal viability of complex head and neck reconstructive surgery by evaluating its financial reimbursement in the setting of resources used. Methods: The authors prospectively assessed provider reimbursement for consecutive patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction. Total care time was determined by adding 15 minutes to the operative time for each postoperative hospital day and each postoperative follow-up appointment within the 90-day global period. Physician reimbursement was divided by total care time hours to determine an hourly rate of reimbursement. A control group of patients undergoing carpal tunnel release was evaluated using the same methods described. Results: A total of 50 patients met the inclusion criteria for study. The payer was Medicaid for nine patients (18 percent), Medicare for 19 patients (38 percent), and commercial for 22 patients (44 percent). The average provider revenue per case was $3241.01 ± $2500.65. For all patients, the mean operative time was 10.6 ± 3.87 hours and the mean number of postoperative hospital days was 15.1 ± 8.06. The mean reimbursement per total care time hour was $254 ± $199.87. Statistical analysis demonstrated difference in reimbursement per total care time hour when grouped by insurance type (p = 0.002) or flap type (p = 0.033). Of the 50 most recent patients to undergo carpal tunnel release, the average revenue per case was $785.27. Conclusion: Total care time analysis demonstrates that physician reimbursement is not commensurate with resources used for complex head and neck reconstructive surgery.",
author = "Smith, {Benjamin D.} and Chandler, {Ashley R.} and Anthony Braswell and Denis Knobel and Andrews, {Brian T.} and Nicholas Bastidas and Weichman, {Katie E.} and Moon, {Victor A.} and Kasabian, {Armen K.} and Neil Tanna",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.prs.0000475828.94283.b2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "980--984",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective Analysis of Payment per Hour in Head and Neck Reconstruction

T2 - Fiscally Feasible or Futile?

AU - Smith, Benjamin D.

AU - Chandler, Ashley R.

AU - Braswell, Anthony

AU - Knobel, Denis

AU - Andrews, Brian T.

AU - Bastidas, Nicholas

AU - Weichman, Katie E.

AU - Moon, Victor A.

AU - Kasabian, Armen K.

AU - Tanna, Neil

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Background: The authors assess the fiscal viability of complex head and neck reconstructive surgery by evaluating its financial reimbursement in the setting of resources used. Methods: The authors prospectively assessed provider reimbursement for consecutive patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction. Total care time was determined by adding 15 minutes to the operative time for each postoperative hospital day and each postoperative follow-up appointment within the 90-day global period. Physician reimbursement was divided by total care time hours to determine an hourly rate of reimbursement. A control group of patients undergoing carpal tunnel release was evaluated using the same methods described. Results: A total of 50 patients met the inclusion criteria for study. The payer was Medicaid for nine patients (18 percent), Medicare for 19 patients (38 percent), and commercial for 22 patients (44 percent). The average provider revenue per case was $3241.01 ± $2500.65. For all patients, the mean operative time was 10.6 ± 3.87 hours and the mean number of postoperative hospital days was 15.1 ± 8.06. The mean reimbursement per total care time hour was $254 ± $199.87. Statistical analysis demonstrated difference in reimbursement per total care time hour when grouped by insurance type (p = 0.002) or flap type (p = 0.033). Of the 50 most recent patients to undergo carpal tunnel release, the average revenue per case was $785.27. Conclusion: Total care time analysis demonstrates that physician reimbursement is not commensurate with resources used for complex head and neck reconstructive surgery.

AB - Background: The authors assess the fiscal viability of complex head and neck reconstructive surgery by evaluating its financial reimbursement in the setting of resources used. Methods: The authors prospectively assessed provider reimbursement for consecutive patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction. Total care time was determined by adding 15 minutes to the operative time for each postoperative hospital day and each postoperative follow-up appointment within the 90-day global period. Physician reimbursement was divided by total care time hours to determine an hourly rate of reimbursement. A control group of patients undergoing carpal tunnel release was evaluated using the same methods described. Results: A total of 50 patients met the inclusion criteria for study. The payer was Medicaid for nine patients (18 percent), Medicare for 19 patients (38 percent), and commercial for 22 patients (44 percent). The average provider revenue per case was $3241.01 ± $2500.65. For all patients, the mean operative time was 10.6 ± 3.87 hours and the mean number of postoperative hospital days was 15.1 ± 8.06. The mean reimbursement per total care time hour was $254 ± $199.87. Statistical analysis demonstrated difference in reimbursement per total care time hour when grouped by insurance type (p = 0.002) or flap type (p = 0.033). Of the 50 most recent patients to undergo carpal tunnel release, the average revenue per case was $785.27. Conclusion: Total care time analysis demonstrates that physician reimbursement is not commensurate with resources used for complex head and neck reconstructive surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959266601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959266601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.prs.0000475828.94283.b2

DO - 10.1097/01.prs.0000475828.94283.b2

M3 - Article

C2 - 26910683

AN - SCOPUS:84959266601

VL - 137

SP - 980

EP - 984

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 3

ER -