Profiles of physical, emotional and psychosocial wellbeing in the Lothian birth cohort 1936

Andrea R. Zammit, John M. Starr, Wendy Johnson, Ian J. Deary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Physical, emotional, and psychosocial wellbeing are important domains of function. The aims of this study were to explore the existence of separable groups among 70-year olds with scores representing physical function, perceived quality of life, and emotional wellbeing, and to characterise any resulting groups using demographic, personality, cognition, health and lifestyle variables. Methods. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify possible groups. Results: Results suggested there were 5 groups. These included High (n = 515, 47.2% of the sample), Average (n = 417, 38.3%), and Poor Wellbeing (n = 37, 3.4%) groups. The two other groups had contrasting patterns of wellbeing: one group scored relatively well on physical function, but low on emotional wellbeing (Good Fitness/ Low Spirits,n = 60, 5.5%), whereas the other group showed low physical function but relatively well emotional wellbeing (Low Fitness/Good Spirits, n = 62, 5.7%). Salient characteristics that distinguished all the groups included smoking and drinking behaviours, personality, and illness. Conclusions: Despite there being some evidence of these groups, the results also support a largely one-dimensional construct of wellbeing in old age - for the domains assessed here - though with some evidence that some individuals have uneven profiles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number64
JournalBMC Geriatrics
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Personality
Parturition
Drinking Behavior
Cognition
Life Style
Smoking
Quality of Life
Demography
Health

Keywords

  • Latent class analysis
  • Physical wellbeing
  • Profiles
  • Psychosocial wellbeing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Profiles of physical, emotional and psychosocial wellbeing in the Lothian birth cohort 1936. / Zammit, Andrea R.; Starr, John M.; Johnson, Wendy; Deary, Ian J.

In: BMC Geriatrics, Vol. 12, 64, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1f0eb2c2ad1c44a0871a7cd9ae8a2c72,
title = "Profiles of physical, emotional and psychosocial wellbeing in the Lothian birth cohort 1936",
abstract = "Background: Physical, emotional, and psychosocial wellbeing are important domains of function. The aims of this study were to explore the existence of separable groups among 70-year olds with scores representing physical function, perceived quality of life, and emotional wellbeing, and to characterise any resulting groups using demographic, personality, cognition, health and lifestyle variables. Methods. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify possible groups. Results: Results suggested there were 5 groups. These included High (n = 515, 47.2{\%} of the sample), Average (n = 417, 38.3{\%}), and Poor Wellbeing (n = 37, 3.4{\%}) groups. The two other groups had contrasting patterns of wellbeing: one group scored relatively well on physical function, but low on emotional wellbeing (Good Fitness/ Low Spirits,n = 60, 5.5{\%}), whereas the other group showed low physical function but relatively well emotional wellbeing (Low Fitness/Good Spirits, n = 62, 5.7{\%}). Salient characteristics that distinguished all the groups included smoking and drinking behaviours, personality, and illness. Conclusions: Despite there being some evidence of these groups, the results also support a largely one-dimensional construct of wellbeing in old age - for the domains assessed here - though with some evidence that some individuals have uneven profiles.",
keywords = "Latent class analysis, Physical wellbeing, Profiles, Psychosocial wellbeing",
author = "Zammit, {Andrea R.} and Starr, {John M.} and Wendy Johnson and Deary, {Ian J.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2318-12-64",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "BMC Geriatrics",
issn = "1471-2318",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Profiles of physical, emotional and psychosocial wellbeing in the Lothian birth cohort 1936

AU - Zammit, Andrea R.

AU - Starr, John M.

AU - Johnson, Wendy

AU - Deary, Ian J.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: Physical, emotional, and psychosocial wellbeing are important domains of function. The aims of this study were to explore the existence of separable groups among 70-year olds with scores representing physical function, perceived quality of life, and emotional wellbeing, and to characterise any resulting groups using demographic, personality, cognition, health and lifestyle variables. Methods. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify possible groups. Results: Results suggested there were 5 groups. These included High (n = 515, 47.2% of the sample), Average (n = 417, 38.3%), and Poor Wellbeing (n = 37, 3.4%) groups. The two other groups had contrasting patterns of wellbeing: one group scored relatively well on physical function, but low on emotional wellbeing (Good Fitness/ Low Spirits,n = 60, 5.5%), whereas the other group showed low physical function but relatively well emotional wellbeing (Low Fitness/Good Spirits, n = 62, 5.7%). Salient characteristics that distinguished all the groups included smoking and drinking behaviours, personality, and illness. Conclusions: Despite there being some evidence of these groups, the results also support a largely one-dimensional construct of wellbeing in old age - for the domains assessed here - though with some evidence that some individuals have uneven profiles.

AB - Background: Physical, emotional, and psychosocial wellbeing are important domains of function. The aims of this study were to explore the existence of separable groups among 70-year olds with scores representing physical function, perceived quality of life, and emotional wellbeing, and to characterise any resulting groups using demographic, personality, cognition, health and lifestyle variables. Methods. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify possible groups. Results: Results suggested there were 5 groups. These included High (n = 515, 47.2% of the sample), Average (n = 417, 38.3%), and Poor Wellbeing (n = 37, 3.4%) groups. The two other groups had contrasting patterns of wellbeing: one group scored relatively well on physical function, but low on emotional wellbeing (Good Fitness/ Low Spirits,n = 60, 5.5%), whereas the other group showed low physical function but relatively well emotional wellbeing (Low Fitness/Good Spirits, n = 62, 5.7%). Salient characteristics that distinguished all the groups included smoking and drinking behaviours, personality, and illness. Conclusions: Despite there being some evidence of these groups, the results also support a largely one-dimensional construct of wellbeing in old age - for the domains assessed here - though with some evidence that some individuals have uneven profiles.

KW - Latent class analysis

KW - Physical wellbeing

KW - Profiles

KW - Psychosocial wellbeing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867637487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867637487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2318-12-64

DO - 10.1186/1471-2318-12-64

M3 - Article

C2 - 23088370

AN - SCOPUS:84867637487

VL - 12

JO - BMC Geriatrics

JF - BMC Geriatrics

SN - 1471-2318

M1 - 64

ER -