Procedural management of rhinophyma

A comprehensive review

Aimee E. Krausz, David J. Goldberg, David H. Ciocon, Adam J. Tinklepaugh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Rhinophyma is a cosmetically deforming disease characterized by nodular overgrowth of the lower 2/3 of the nose and is considered the end stage of acne rosacea. Aims: Review the spectrum of procedural techniques for treatment of rhinophyma with a focus on the advantages and disadvantages of each modality. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the search terms “rhinophyma,” “treatment,” and “surgery” in PubMed. Case reports, case series, and small retrospective trials using procedural techniques for management of rhinophyma were included for review. Animal studies, non-English articles, and reports of medical treatment of rhinophyma were excluded. Results: There are currently no prospective, randomized controlled studies evaluating procedural management of rhinophyma. The most commonly employed treatments include scalpel excision, resection with heated knives, dermabrasion, electrosurgery and lasers, specifically carbon dioxide (CO2) and erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG). The main complication associated with complete excision of rhinophymatous tissue is excessive scarring. To correct for this adverse effect, partial or tangential excision with preservation of underlying adnexal structures is now the accepted technique, irrespective of the chosen modality. Conclusion: There is no accepted gold standard for management of rhinophyma, and each modality succeeds in maintaining hemostasis, reducing scarring and achieving satisfactory cosmesis to different degrees. There is a conflicting data on the theoretical risk of recurrence with partial excision due to incomplete removal of tissue. Further studies evaluating this risk and alternate methods of prevention are required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Cosmetic Dermatology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Rhinophyma
Cicatrix
Dermabrasion
Erbium
Electrosurgery
Rosacea
Gas Lasers
Therapeutics
Hemostasis
Nose
PubMed
Recurrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Procedural management of rhinophyma : A comprehensive review. / Krausz, Aimee E.; Goldberg, David J.; Ciocon, David H.; Tinklepaugh, Adam J.

In: Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krausz, Aimee E. ; Goldberg, David J. ; Ciocon, David H. ; Tinklepaugh, Adam J. / Procedural management of rhinophyma : A comprehensive review. In: Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2018.
@article{1b0a0c15af81411fa34eac6d3b5d62fc,
title = "Procedural management of rhinophyma: A comprehensive review",
abstract = "Background: Rhinophyma is a cosmetically deforming disease characterized by nodular overgrowth of the lower 2/3 of the nose and is considered the end stage of acne rosacea. Aims: Review the spectrum of procedural techniques for treatment of rhinophyma with a focus on the advantages and disadvantages of each modality. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the search terms “rhinophyma,” “treatment,” and “surgery” in PubMed. Case reports, case series, and small retrospective trials using procedural techniques for management of rhinophyma were included for review. Animal studies, non-English articles, and reports of medical treatment of rhinophyma were excluded. Results: There are currently no prospective, randomized controlled studies evaluating procedural management of rhinophyma. The most commonly employed treatments include scalpel excision, resection with heated knives, dermabrasion, electrosurgery and lasers, specifically carbon dioxide (CO2) and erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG). The main complication associated with complete excision of rhinophymatous tissue is excessive scarring. To correct for this adverse effect, partial or tangential excision with preservation of underlying adnexal structures is now the accepted technique, irrespective of the chosen modality. Conclusion: There is no accepted gold standard for management of rhinophyma, and each modality succeeds in maintaining hemostasis, reducing scarring and achieving satisfactory cosmesis to different degrees. There is a conflicting data on the theoretical risk of recurrence with partial excision due to incomplete removal of tissue. Further studies evaluating this risk and alternate methods of prevention are required.",
author = "Krausz, {Aimee E.} and Goldberg, {David J.} and Ciocon, {David H.} and Tinklepaugh, {Adam J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jocd.12770",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology",
issn = "1473-2130",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procedural management of rhinophyma

T2 - A comprehensive review

AU - Krausz, Aimee E.

AU - Goldberg, David J.

AU - Ciocon, David H.

AU - Tinklepaugh, Adam J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Rhinophyma is a cosmetically deforming disease characterized by nodular overgrowth of the lower 2/3 of the nose and is considered the end stage of acne rosacea. Aims: Review the spectrum of procedural techniques for treatment of rhinophyma with a focus on the advantages and disadvantages of each modality. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the search terms “rhinophyma,” “treatment,” and “surgery” in PubMed. Case reports, case series, and small retrospective trials using procedural techniques for management of rhinophyma were included for review. Animal studies, non-English articles, and reports of medical treatment of rhinophyma were excluded. Results: There are currently no prospective, randomized controlled studies evaluating procedural management of rhinophyma. The most commonly employed treatments include scalpel excision, resection with heated knives, dermabrasion, electrosurgery and lasers, specifically carbon dioxide (CO2) and erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG). The main complication associated with complete excision of rhinophymatous tissue is excessive scarring. To correct for this adverse effect, partial or tangential excision with preservation of underlying adnexal structures is now the accepted technique, irrespective of the chosen modality. Conclusion: There is no accepted gold standard for management of rhinophyma, and each modality succeeds in maintaining hemostasis, reducing scarring and achieving satisfactory cosmesis to different degrees. There is a conflicting data on the theoretical risk of recurrence with partial excision due to incomplete removal of tissue. Further studies evaluating this risk and alternate methods of prevention are required.

AB - Background: Rhinophyma is a cosmetically deforming disease characterized by nodular overgrowth of the lower 2/3 of the nose and is considered the end stage of acne rosacea. Aims: Review the spectrum of procedural techniques for treatment of rhinophyma with a focus on the advantages and disadvantages of each modality. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the search terms “rhinophyma,” “treatment,” and “surgery” in PubMed. Case reports, case series, and small retrospective trials using procedural techniques for management of rhinophyma were included for review. Animal studies, non-English articles, and reports of medical treatment of rhinophyma were excluded. Results: There are currently no prospective, randomized controlled studies evaluating procedural management of rhinophyma. The most commonly employed treatments include scalpel excision, resection with heated knives, dermabrasion, electrosurgery and lasers, specifically carbon dioxide (CO2) and erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG). The main complication associated with complete excision of rhinophymatous tissue is excessive scarring. To correct for this adverse effect, partial or tangential excision with preservation of underlying adnexal structures is now the accepted technique, irrespective of the chosen modality. Conclusion: There is no accepted gold standard for management of rhinophyma, and each modality succeeds in maintaining hemostasis, reducing scarring and achieving satisfactory cosmesis to different degrees. There is a conflicting data on the theoretical risk of recurrence with partial excision due to incomplete removal of tissue. Further studies evaluating this risk and alternate methods of prevention are required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053454652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053454652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocd.12770

DO - 10.1111/jocd.12770

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology

JF - Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology

SN - 1473-2130

ER -