Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: Outcomes with Expectant Management until 34 versus 35 Weeks

Tara A. Lynch, Courtney Olson-Chen, Sarah Colihan, Jeffrey Meyers, Conisha Holloman, Dongmei Li, Heather Link, Paola Torres, Annie Kim, Devon J. King, Cari Eckman, Anna Varlamov, Scott Dexter, Eva K. Pressman, Eleazar Soto-Torres, Amol Malshe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To evaluate outcomes with expectant management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) until 35 weeks versus immediate delivery at ≥34 weeks. Study Design This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of singletons with preterm PROM at >20 weeks from 2011 through 2017. Groups were defined as expectant management until 35 weeks versus immediate delivery at ≥34 weeks. Primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity: need for respiratory support, culture positive neonatal sepsis, or antibiotic administration for >72 hours. Univariate and general estimating equation models were used with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results A total of 280 mother-infant dyads were included. There was no difference in composite neonatal outcome in pregnancies managed with expectant management compared with immediate delivery (43.4 vs. 37.5%; p = 0.32). Those with expectant management had shorter length of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission but higher rates of neonatal antibiotics for > 72 hours, endometritis, and histological chorioamnionitis. There were no cases of fetal demise, neonatal death, or maternal sepsis, and only three cases of neonatal sepsis. Conclusion There is no difference in composite neonatal morbidity in pregnancies with preterm PROM managed with expectant management until 35 weeks as compared with immediate delivery at 34 weeks. Expectant management is associated with a decreased length of NICU admission but increased short-term infectious morbidity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)659-668
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
Volume36
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rupture
Morbidity
Membranes
Chorioamnionitis
Endometritis
Fetal Death
Sepsis
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Mothers
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Pregnancy
Neonatal Sepsis
Perinatal Death

Keywords

  • expectant management
  • late preterm birth
  • preterm prelabor rupture of membranes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Lynch, T. A., Olson-Chen, C., Colihan, S., Meyers, J., Holloman, C., Li, D., ... Malshe, A. (2019). Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: Outcomes with Expectant Management until 34 versus 35 Weeks. American Journal of Perinatology, 36(7), 659-668. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675647

Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes : Outcomes with Expectant Management until 34 versus 35 Weeks. / Lynch, Tara A.; Olson-Chen, Courtney; Colihan, Sarah; Meyers, Jeffrey; Holloman, Conisha; Li, Dongmei; Link, Heather; Torres, Paola; Kim, Annie; King, Devon J.; Eckman, Cari; Varlamov, Anna; Dexter, Scott; Pressman, Eva K.; Soto-Torres, Eleazar; Malshe, Amol.

In: American Journal of Perinatology, Vol. 36, No. 7, 01.01.2019, p. 659-668.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lynch, TA, Olson-Chen, C, Colihan, S, Meyers, J, Holloman, C, Li, D, Link, H, Torres, P, Kim, A, King, DJ, Eckman, C, Varlamov, A, Dexter, S, Pressman, EK, Soto-Torres, E & Malshe, A 2019, 'Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: Outcomes with Expectant Management until 34 versus 35 Weeks', American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 659-668. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675647
Lynch, Tara A. ; Olson-Chen, Courtney ; Colihan, Sarah ; Meyers, Jeffrey ; Holloman, Conisha ; Li, Dongmei ; Link, Heather ; Torres, Paola ; Kim, Annie ; King, Devon J. ; Eckman, Cari ; Varlamov, Anna ; Dexter, Scott ; Pressman, Eva K. ; Soto-Torres, Eleazar ; Malshe, Amol. / Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes : Outcomes with Expectant Management until 34 versus 35 Weeks. In: American Journal of Perinatology. 2019 ; Vol. 36, No. 7. pp. 659-668.
@article{3c668345901144ff8f745d63e7b77133,
title = "Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: Outcomes with Expectant Management until 34 versus 35 Weeks",
abstract = "Objective To evaluate outcomes with expectant management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) until 35 weeks versus immediate delivery at ≥34 weeks. Study Design This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of singletons with preterm PROM at >20 weeks from 2011 through 2017. Groups were defined as expectant management until 35 weeks versus immediate delivery at ≥34 weeks. Primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity: need for respiratory support, culture positive neonatal sepsis, or antibiotic administration for >72 hours. Univariate and general estimating equation models were used with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results A total of 280 mother-infant dyads were included. There was no difference in composite neonatal outcome in pregnancies managed with expectant management compared with immediate delivery (43.4 vs. 37.5{\%}; p = 0.32). Those with expectant management had shorter length of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission but higher rates of neonatal antibiotics for > 72 hours, endometritis, and histological chorioamnionitis. There were no cases of fetal demise, neonatal death, or maternal sepsis, and only three cases of neonatal sepsis. Conclusion There is no difference in composite neonatal morbidity in pregnancies with preterm PROM managed with expectant management until 35 weeks as compared with immediate delivery at 34 weeks. Expectant management is associated with a decreased length of NICU admission but increased short-term infectious morbidity.",
keywords = "expectant management, late preterm birth, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes",
author = "Lynch, {Tara A.} and Courtney Olson-Chen and Sarah Colihan and Jeffrey Meyers and Conisha Holloman and Dongmei Li and Heather Link and Paola Torres and Annie Kim and King, {Devon J.} and Cari Eckman and Anna Varlamov and Scott Dexter and Pressman, {Eva K.} and Eleazar Soto-Torres and Amol Malshe",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0038-1675647",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "659--668",
journal = "American Journal of Perinatology",
issn = "0735-1631",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes

T2 - Outcomes with Expectant Management until 34 versus 35 Weeks

AU - Lynch, Tara A.

AU - Olson-Chen, Courtney

AU - Colihan, Sarah

AU - Meyers, Jeffrey

AU - Holloman, Conisha

AU - Li, Dongmei

AU - Link, Heather

AU - Torres, Paola

AU - Kim, Annie

AU - King, Devon J.

AU - Eckman, Cari

AU - Varlamov, Anna

AU - Dexter, Scott

AU - Pressman, Eva K.

AU - Soto-Torres, Eleazar

AU - Malshe, Amol

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective To evaluate outcomes with expectant management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) until 35 weeks versus immediate delivery at ≥34 weeks. Study Design This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of singletons with preterm PROM at >20 weeks from 2011 through 2017. Groups were defined as expectant management until 35 weeks versus immediate delivery at ≥34 weeks. Primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity: need for respiratory support, culture positive neonatal sepsis, or antibiotic administration for >72 hours. Univariate and general estimating equation models were used with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results A total of 280 mother-infant dyads were included. There was no difference in composite neonatal outcome in pregnancies managed with expectant management compared with immediate delivery (43.4 vs. 37.5%; p = 0.32). Those with expectant management had shorter length of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission but higher rates of neonatal antibiotics for > 72 hours, endometritis, and histological chorioamnionitis. There were no cases of fetal demise, neonatal death, or maternal sepsis, and only three cases of neonatal sepsis. Conclusion There is no difference in composite neonatal morbidity in pregnancies with preterm PROM managed with expectant management until 35 weeks as compared with immediate delivery at 34 weeks. Expectant management is associated with a decreased length of NICU admission but increased short-term infectious morbidity.

AB - Objective To evaluate outcomes with expectant management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) until 35 weeks versus immediate delivery at ≥34 weeks. Study Design This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of singletons with preterm PROM at >20 weeks from 2011 through 2017. Groups were defined as expectant management until 35 weeks versus immediate delivery at ≥34 weeks. Primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity: need for respiratory support, culture positive neonatal sepsis, or antibiotic administration for >72 hours. Univariate and general estimating equation models were used with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results A total of 280 mother-infant dyads were included. There was no difference in composite neonatal outcome in pregnancies managed with expectant management compared with immediate delivery (43.4 vs. 37.5%; p = 0.32). Those with expectant management had shorter length of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission but higher rates of neonatal antibiotics for > 72 hours, endometritis, and histological chorioamnionitis. There were no cases of fetal demise, neonatal death, or maternal sepsis, and only three cases of neonatal sepsis. Conclusion There is no difference in composite neonatal morbidity in pregnancies with preterm PROM managed with expectant management until 35 weeks as compared with immediate delivery at 34 weeks. Expectant management is associated with a decreased length of NICU admission but increased short-term infectious morbidity.

KW - expectant management

KW - late preterm birth

KW - preterm prelabor rupture of membranes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066743925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066743925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0038-1675647

DO - 10.1055/s-0038-1675647

M3 - Article

C2 - 30553236

AN - SCOPUS:85066743925

VL - 36

SP - 659

EP - 668

JO - American Journal of Perinatology

JF - American Journal of Perinatology

SN - 0735-1631

IS - 7

ER -