Preferences for implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): Results from a survey of primary care providers

E. Jennifer Edelman, Brent A. Moore, Sarah K. Calabrese, Gail Berkenblit, Chinazo O. Cunningham, Onyema Ogbuagu, Viraj V. Patel, Karran A. Phillips, Jeanette M. Tetrault, Minesh Shah, Oni Blackstock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Primary care physicians (PCPs) are critical for promoting HIV prevention by prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Yet, there are limited data regarding PCP's preferred approaches for PrEP implementation. In 2015, we conducted an online survey of PCPs’ PrEP prescribing and implementation. Participants were general internists recruited from a national professional organization. We examined provider and practice characteristics and perceived implementation barriers and facilitators associated with preferred models for PrEP implementation. Among 240 participants, the majority (85%) favored integrating PrEP into primary care, either by training all providers (“all trained”) (42%) or having an onsite PrEP specialist (“on-site specialist”) (43%). Only 15% preferred referring patients out of the practice to a specialist (“refer out”). Compared to those who preferred to “refer out,” participants who preferred the “all trained” model were more likely to spend most of their time delivering direct patient care and to practice in the Northeast. Compared to participants who preferred the “refer out” or on-site specialist” models, PCPs preferring the all trained model were less likely to perceive lack of clinic PrEP guidelines/protocols as a barrier to PrEP. Most PCPs favored integrating PrEP into primary care by either training all providers or having an on-site specialist. Time devoted to clinical care and geography may influence preferences for PrEP implementation. Establishing clinic-specific PrEP protocols may promote on-site PrEP implementation. Future studies should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of different PrEP implementation models on PrEP delivery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101012
JournalPreventive Medicine Reports
Volume17
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2020

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
HIV
Primary Care Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
Geography
Patient Care
Guidelines

Keywords

  • HIV prevention
  • Implementation
  • Pre-exposure prophylaxis
  • Primary care physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Preferences for implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) : Results from a survey of primary care providers. / Edelman, E. Jennifer; Moore, Brent A.; Calabrese, Sarah K.; Berkenblit, Gail; Cunningham, Chinazo O.; Ogbuagu, Onyema; Patel, Viraj V.; Phillips, Karran A.; Tetrault, Jeanette M.; Shah, Minesh; Blackstock, Oni.

In: Preventive Medicine Reports, Vol. 17, 101012, 03.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Edelman, EJ, Moore, BA, Calabrese, SK, Berkenblit, G, Cunningham, CO, Ogbuagu, O, Patel, VV, Phillips, KA, Tetrault, JM, Shah, M & Blackstock, O 2020, 'Preferences for implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): Results from a survey of primary care providers', Preventive Medicine Reports, vol. 17, 101012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101012
Edelman, E. Jennifer ; Moore, Brent A. ; Calabrese, Sarah K. ; Berkenblit, Gail ; Cunningham, Chinazo O. ; Ogbuagu, Onyema ; Patel, Viraj V. ; Phillips, Karran A. ; Tetrault, Jeanette M. ; Shah, Minesh ; Blackstock, Oni. / Preferences for implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) : Results from a survey of primary care providers. In: Preventive Medicine Reports. 2020 ; Vol. 17.
@article{8aaac3b8064b47d98fcc3f2602e284f7,
title = "Preferences for implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): Results from a survey of primary care providers",
abstract = "Primary care physicians (PCPs) are critical for promoting HIV prevention by prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Yet, there are limited data regarding PCP's preferred approaches for PrEP implementation. In 2015, we conducted an online survey of PCPs’ PrEP prescribing and implementation. Participants were general internists recruited from a national professional organization. We examined provider and practice characteristics and perceived implementation barriers and facilitators associated with preferred models for PrEP implementation. Among 240 participants, the majority (85{\%}) favored integrating PrEP into primary care, either by training all providers (“all trained”) (42{\%}) or having an onsite PrEP specialist (“on-site specialist”) (43{\%}). Only 15{\%} preferred referring patients out of the practice to a specialist (“refer out”). Compared to those who preferred to “refer out,” participants who preferred the “all trained” model were more likely to spend most of their time delivering direct patient care and to practice in the Northeast. Compared to participants who preferred the “refer out” or on-site specialist” models, PCPs preferring the all trained model were less likely to perceive lack of clinic PrEP guidelines/protocols as a barrier to PrEP. Most PCPs favored integrating PrEP into primary care by either training all providers or having an on-site specialist. Time devoted to clinical care and geography may influence preferences for PrEP implementation. Establishing clinic-specific PrEP protocols may promote on-site PrEP implementation. Future studies should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of different PrEP implementation models on PrEP delivery.",
keywords = "HIV prevention, Implementation, Pre-exposure prophylaxis, Primary care physicians",
author = "Edelman, {E. Jennifer} and Moore, {Brent A.} and Calabrese, {Sarah K.} and Gail Berkenblit and Cunningham, {Chinazo O.} and Onyema Ogbuagu and Patel, {Viraj V.} and Phillips, {Karran A.} and Tetrault, {Jeanette M.} and Minesh Shah and Oni Blackstock",
year = "2020",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "Preventive Medicine Reports",
issn = "2211-3355",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preferences for implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)

T2 - Results from a survey of primary care providers

AU - Edelman, E. Jennifer

AU - Moore, Brent A.

AU - Calabrese, Sarah K.

AU - Berkenblit, Gail

AU - Cunningham, Chinazo O.

AU - Ogbuagu, Onyema

AU - Patel, Viraj V.

AU - Phillips, Karran A.

AU - Tetrault, Jeanette M.

AU - Shah, Minesh

AU - Blackstock, Oni

PY - 2020/3

Y1 - 2020/3

N2 - Primary care physicians (PCPs) are critical for promoting HIV prevention by prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Yet, there are limited data regarding PCP's preferred approaches for PrEP implementation. In 2015, we conducted an online survey of PCPs’ PrEP prescribing and implementation. Participants were general internists recruited from a national professional organization. We examined provider and practice characteristics and perceived implementation barriers and facilitators associated with preferred models for PrEP implementation. Among 240 participants, the majority (85%) favored integrating PrEP into primary care, either by training all providers (“all trained”) (42%) or having an onsite PrEP specialist (“on-site specialist”) (43%). Only 15% preferred referring patients out of the practice to a specialist (“refer out”). Compared to those who preferred to “refer out,” participants who preferred the “all trained” model were more likely to spend most of their time delivering direct patient care and to practice in the Northeast. Compared to participants who preferred the “refer out” or on-site specialist” models, PCPs preferring the all trained model were less likely to perceive lack of clinic PrEP guidelines/protocols as a barrier to PrEP. Most PCPs favored integrating PrEP into primary care by either training all providers or having an on-site specialist. Time devoted to clinical care and geography may influence preferences for PrEP implementation. Establishing clinic-specific PrEP protocols may promote on-site PrEP implementation. Future studies should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of different PrEP implementation models on PrEP delivery.

AB - Primary care physicians (PCPs) are critical for promoting HIV prevention by prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Yet, there are limited data regarding PCP's preferred approaches for PrEP implementation. In 2015, we conducted an online survey of PCPs’ PrEP prescribing and implementation. Participants were general internists recruited from a national professional organization. We examined provider and practice characteristics and perceived implementation barriers and facilitators associated with preferred models for PrEP implementation. Among 240 participants, the majority (85%) favored integrating PrEP into primary care, either by training all providers (“all trained”) (42%) or having an onsite PrEP specialist (“on-site specialist”) (43%). Only 15% preferred referring patients out of the practice to a specialist (“refer out”). Compared to those who preferred to “refer out,” participants who preferred the “all trained” model were more likely to spend most of their time delivering direct patient care and to practice in the Northeast. Compared to participants who preferred the “refer out” or on-site specialist” models, PCPs preferring the all trained model were less likely to perceive lack of clinic PrEP guidelines/protocols as a barrier to PrEP. Most PCPs favored integrating PrEP into primary care by either training all providers or having an on-site specialist. Time devoted to clinical care and geography may influence preferences for PrEP implementation. Establishing clinic-specific PrEP protocols may promote on-site PrEP implementation. Future studies should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of different PrEP implementation models on PrEP delivery.

KW - HIV prevention

KW - Implementation

KW - Pre-exposure prophylaxis

KW - Primary care physicians

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076456956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076456956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101012

DO - 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85076456956

VL - 17

JO - Preventive Medicine Reports

JF - Preventive Medicine Reports

SN - 2211-3355

M1 - 101012

ER -