Practical, Ethical, and Legal Challenges Underlying Crisis Standards of Care

James G. Hodge, Dan Hanfling, Patricia (Tia) Powell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public health emergencies implicate difficult decisions among medical and emergency first responders about how to allocate essential resources. While various actors have proffered approaches on how to make these tough choices, meaningful guidance on shifting standards of care in major emergencies remained lacking. In March 2012, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released additional guidance to assist facilities and practitioners to address scarce resource allocation through the development of "crisis standards of care" in catastrophes. As discussed in the article, identifying and resolving of complex practical, ethical, and legal challenges underlying real-time implementation of these standards are indispensable to protecting the public's health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-55
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
Volume41
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Standard of Care
Emergency Responders
Emergencies
Public Health
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Resource Allocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

Practical, Ethical, and Legal Challenges Underlying Crisis Standards of Care. / Hodge, James G.; Hanfling, Dan; Powell, Patricia (Tia).

In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, Vol. 41, No. SUPPL. 1, 03.2013, p. 50-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{82b6033c828f41139e76abe3fe6bdcd5,
title = "Practical, Ethical, and Legal Challenges Underlying Crisis Standards of Care",
abstract = "Public health emergencies implicate difficult decisions among medical and emergency first responders about how to allocate essential resources. While various actors have proffered approaches on how to make these tough choices, meaningful guidance on shifting standards of care in major emergencies remained lacking. In March 2012, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released additional guidance to assist facilities and practitioners to address scarce resource allocation through the development of {"}crisis standards of care{"} in catastrophes. As discussed in the article, identifying and resolving of complex practical, ethical, and legal challenges underlying real-time implementation of these standards are indispensable to protecting the public's health.",
author = "Hodge, {James G.} and Dan Hanfling and Powell, {Patricia (Tia)}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/jlme.12039",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "50--55",
journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics",
issn = "1073-1105",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practical, Ethical, and Legal Challenges Underlying Crisis Standards of Care

AU - Hodge, James G.

AU - Hanfling, Dan

AU - Powell, Patricia (Tia)

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Public health emergencies implicate difficult decisions among medical and emergency first responders about how to allocate essential resources. While various actors have proffered approaches on how to make these tough choices, meaningful guidance on shifting standards of care in major emergencies remained lacking. In March 2012, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released additional guidance to assist facilities and practitioners to address scarce resource allocation through the development of "crisis standards of care" in catastrophes. As discussed in the article, identifying and resolving of complex practical, ethical, and legal challenges underlying real-time implementation of these standards are indispensable to protecting the public's health.

AB - Public health emergencies implicate difficult decisions among medical and emergency first responders about how to allocate essential resources. While various actors have proffered approaches on how to make these tough choices, meaningful guidance on shifting standards of care in major emergencies remained lacking. In March 2012, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released additional guidance to assist facilities and practitioners to address scarce resource allocation through the development of "crisis standards of care" in catastrophes. As discussed in the article, identifying and resolving of complex practical, ethical, and legal challenges underlying real-time implementation of these standards are indispensable to protecting the public's health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876964369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876964369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jlme.12039

DO - 10.1111/jlme.12039

M3 - Article

C2 - 23590741

AN - SCOPUS:84876964369

VL - 41

SP - 50

EP - 55

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

SN - 1073-1105

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -