Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research

J. Illes, M. P. Kirschen, E. Edwards, P. Bandettini, M. K. Cho, P. J. Ford, G. H. Glover, J. Kulynych, R. MacKlin, D. B. Michael, S. M. Wolf, T. Grabowski, B. Seto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A decade of empirical work in brain imaging, genomics, and other areas of research has yielded new knowledge about the frequency of incidental findings, investigator responsibility, and risks and benefits of disclosure. Straightforward guidance for handling such findings of possible clinical significance, however, has been elusive. In early work focusing on imaging studies of the brain, we suggested that investigators and institutional review boards must anticipate and articulate plans for handling incidental findings. Here we provide a detailed analysis of different approaches to the problem and evaluate their merits in the context of the goals and setting of the research and the involvement of neurologists, radiologists, and other physicians. Protecting subject welfare and privacy, as well as ensuring scientific integrity, are the highest priorities in making choices about how to handle incidental findings. Forethought and clarity will enable these goals without overburdening research conducted within or outside the medical setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)384-390
Number of pages7
JournalNeurology
Volume70
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Incidental Findings
Neuroimaging
Research
Research Personnel
Privacy
Research Ethics Committees
Disclosure
Genomics
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Illes, J., Kirschen, M. P., Edwards, E., Bandettini, P., Cho, M. K., Ford, P. J., ... Seto, B. (2008). Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research. Neurology, 70(5), 384-390. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000280469.17461.94

Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research. / Illes, J.; Kirschen, M. P.; Edwards, E.; Bandettini, P.; Cho, M. K.; Ford, P. J.; Glover, G. H.; Kulynych, J.; MacKlin, R.; Michael, D. B.; Wolf, S. M.; Grabowski, T.; Seto, B.

In: Neurology, Vol. 70, No. 5, 01.2008, p. 384-390.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Illes, J, Kirschen, MP, Edwards, E, Bandettini, P, Cho, MK, Ford, PJ, Glover, GH, Kulynych, J, MacKlin, R, Michael, DB, Wolf, SM, Grabowski, T & Seto, B 2008, 'Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research', Neurology, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 384-390. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000280469.17461.94
Illes J, Kirschen MP, Edwards E, Bandettini P, Cho MK, Ford PJ et al. Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research. Neurology. 2008 Jan;70(5):384-390. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000280469.17461.94
Illes, J. ; Kirschen, M. P. ; Edwards, E. ; Bandettini, P. ; Cho, M. K. ; Ford, P. J. ; Glover, G. H. ; Kulynych, J. ; MacKlin, R. ; Michael, D. B. ; Wolf, S. M. ; Grabowski, T. ; Seto, B. / Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research. In: Neurology. 2008 ; Vol. 70, No. 5. pp. 384-390.
@article{6b75a8e2753441248c30d88b37cb18b0,
title = "Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research",
abstract = "A decade of empirical work in brain imaging, genomics, and other areas of research has yielded new knowledge about the frequency of incidental findings, investigator responsibility, and risks and benefits of disclosure. Straightforward guidance for handling such findings of possible clinical significance, however, has been elusive. In early work focusing on imaging studies of the brain, we suggested that investigators and institutional review boards must anticipate and articulate plans for handling incidental findings. Here we provide a detailed analysis of different approaches to the problem and evaluate their merits in the context of the goals and setting of the research and the involvement of neurologists, radiologists, and other physicians. Protecting subject welfare and privacy, as well as ensuring scientific integrity, are the highest priorities in making choices about how to handle incidental findings. Forethought and clarity will enable these goals without overburdening research conducted within or outside the medical setting.",
author = "J. Illes and Kirschen, {M. P.} and E. Edwards and P. Bandettini and Cho, {M. K.} and Ford, {P. J.} and Glover, {G. H.} and J. Kulynych and R. MacKlin and Michael, {D. B.} and Wolf, {S. M.} and T. Grabowski and B. Seto",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1212/01.wnl.0000280469.17461.94",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "384--390",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research

AU - Illes, J.

AU - Kirschen, M. P.

AU - Edwards, E.

AU - Bandettini, P.

AU - Cho, M. K.

AU - Ford, P. J.

AU - Glover, G. H.

AU - Kulynych, J.

AU - MacKlin, R.

AU - Michael, D. B.

AU - Wolf, S. M.

AU - Grabowski, T.

AU - Seto, B.

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - A decade of empirical work in brain imaging, genomics, and other areas of research has yielded new knowledge about the frequency of incidental findings, investigator responsibility, and risks and benefits of disclosure. Straightforward guidance for handling such findings of possible clinical significance, however, has been elusive. In early work focusing on imaging studies of the brain, we suggested that investigators and institutional review boards must anticipate and articulate plans for handling incidental findings. Here we provide a detailed analysis of different approaches to the problem and evaluate their merits in the context of the goals and setting of the research and the involvement of neurologists, radiologists, and other physicians. Protecting subject welfare and privacy, as well as ensuring scientific integrity, are the highest priorities in making choices about how to handle incidental findings. Forethought and clarity will enable these goals without overburdening research conducted within or outside the medical setting.

AB - A decade of empirical work in brain imaging, genomics, and other areas of research has yielded new knowledge about the frequency of incidental findings, investigator responsibility, and risks and benefits of disclosure. Straightforward guidance for handling such findings of possible clinical significance, however, has been elusive. In early work focusing on imaging studies of the brain, we suggested that investigators and institutional review boards must anticipate and articulate plans for handling incidental findings. Here we provide a detailed analysis of different approaches to the problem and evaluate their merits in the context of the goals and setting of the research and the involvement of neurologists, radiologists, and other physicians. Protecting subject welfare and privacy, as well as ensuring scientific integrity, are the highest priorities in making choices about how to handle incidental findings. Forethought and clarity will enable these goals without overburdening research conducted within or outside the medical setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39749091186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39749091186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1212/01.wnl.0000280469.17461.94

DO - 10.1212/01.wnl.0000280469.17461.94

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 384

EP - 390

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 5

ER -