Potential for radiation therapy technology innovations to permit dose escalation for non-small-cell lung cancer

Rafael R. Mañon, Hazim Jaradat, Rakesh Patel, Tiezhi Zhang, John Fenwick, Wolfgang A. Tome, Jack Fowler, Bhudatt Paliwal, Emilie Soisson, Zhilong Yuan, Minesh Mehta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Innovations in radiation therapy (RT) technology could have the potential to allow for radiation dose escalation by evaluating tumor motion, minimizing and compensating for motion, and evaluating delivery technologies such as 3-dimensonal (3D) conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) using tomotherapy. Materials and methods: Ninety different RT plans were generated using 3 different treatment techniques for 10 patients. These were evaluated using dosimetric tools such as dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis, tumor equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and dosimetric parameters predictive for lung toxicity, such as the volume of lung receiving > 20 Gy of radiation (V20) and the normalized mean total radiation dose to the lung (NTDmean). The 3 techniques studied included free breathing using 3D CRT, 3D CRT with maximum-inspiration breath-hold (MIBH) to minimize tumor motion, and IMRT delivery with MIBH; the combination of 3 separate planning treatment-volume sets resulted in the generation of 90 different treatment plans. To plan these, patients underwent treatment-planning computed tomography in MIBH and free breathing followed by simulation with measurement of tumor motion and generation/ evaluation of DVHs, EUDs, V20, and NTDmean. Results: Average tumor motion was 1.54 cm in the cephalocaudad directions, 1.26 cm in the anteroposterior directions, and 0.56 cm in the lateral directions between maximum inspiration and expiration. Maximum-inspiration breath-hold produced superior lung sparing evidenced by lower V20 and NTDmean values, and these parameters predicted lower modeled pneumonitis rates. Tomotherapy-based IMRT provided further lung sparing. Conclusion: Treatment in MIBH results in lower V20 and NT Dmean values and lower modeled pneumonitis rates. This effect is enhanced by the use of IMRT. The use of MIBH with IMRT may therefore aid in escalating the dose in RT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-113
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Lung Cancer
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Radiotherapy
Technology
Lung
Neoplasms
Pneumonia
Respiration
Radiation
Therapeutics
Radiation Dosage
Tomography
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Dose-volume histogram
  • Maximum-inspiration breath-hold technique
  • Pneumonitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Potential for radiation therapy technology innovations to permit dose escalation for non-small-cell lung cancer. / Mañon, Rafael R.; Jaradat, Hazim; Patel, Rakesh; Zhang, Tiezhi; Fenwick, John; Tome, Wolfgang A.; Fowler, Jack; Paliwal, Bhudatt; Soisson, Emilie; Yuan, Zhilong; Mehta, Minesh.

In: Clinical Lung Cancer, Vol. 7, No. 2, 09.2005, p. 107-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mañon, RR, Jaradat, H, Patel, R, Zhang, T, Fenwick, J, Tome, WA, Fowler, J, Paliwal, B, Soisson, E, Yuan, Z & Mehta, M 2005, 'Potential for radiation therapy technology innovations to permit dose escalation for non-small-cell lung cancer', Clinical Lung Cancer, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 107-113. https://doi.org/10.3816/CLC.2005.n.025
Mañon, Rafael R. ; Jaradat, Hazim ; Patel, Rakesh ; Zhang, Tiezhi ; Fenwick, John ; Tome, Wolfgang A. ; Fowler, Jack ; Paliwal, Bhudatt ; Soisson, Emilie ; Yuan, Zhilong ; Mehta, Minesh. / Potential for radiation therapy technology innovations to permit dose escalation for non-small-cell lung cancer. In: Clinical Lung Cancer. 2005 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 107-113.
@article{64e600d3e0c6452b966bfe4bf3e0f616,
title = "Potential for radiation therapy technology innovations to permit dose escalation for non-small-cell lung cancer",
abstract = "Background: Innovations in radiation therapy (RT) technology could have the potential to allow for radiation dose escalation by evaluating tumor motion, minimizing and compensating for motion, and evaluating delivery technologies such as 3-dimensonal (3D) conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) using tomotherapy. Materials and methods: Ninety different RT plans were generated using 3 different treatment techniques for 10 patients. These were evaluated using dosimetric tools such as dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis, tumor equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and dosimetric parameters predictive for lung toxicity, such as the volume of lung receiving > 20 Gy of radiation (V20) and the normalized mean total radiation dose to the lung (NTDmean). The 3 techniques studied included free breathing using 3D CRT, 3D CRT with maximum-inspiration breath-hold (MIBH) to minimize tumor motion, and IMRT delivery with MIBH; the combination of 3 separate planning treatment-volume sets resulted in the generation of 90 different treatment plans. To plan these, patients underwent treatment-planning computed tomography in MIBH and free breathing followed by simulation with measurement of tumor motion and generation/ evaluation of DVHs, EUDs, V20, and NTDmean. Results: Average tumor motion was 1.54 cm in the cephalocaudad directions, 1.26 cm in the anteroposterior directions, and 0.56 cm in the lateral directions between maximum inspiration and expiration. Maximum-inspiration breath-hold produced superior lung sparing evidenced by lower V20 and NTDmean values, and these parameters predicted lower modeled pneumonitis rates. Tomotherapy-based IMRT provided further lung sparing. Conclusion: Treatment in MIBH results in lower V20 and NT Dmean values and lower modeled pneumonitis rates. This effect is enhanced by the use of IMRT. The use of MIBH with IMRT may therefore aid in escalating the dose in RT.",
keywords = "Dose-volume histogram, Maximum-inspiration breath-hold technique, Pneumonitis",
author = "Ma{\~n}on, {Rafael R.} and Hazim Jaradat and Rakesh Patel and Tiezhi Zhang and John Fenwick and Tome, {Wolfgang A.} and Jack Fowler and Bhudatt Paliwal and Emilie Soisson and Zhilong Yuan and Minesh Mehta",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3816/CLC.2005.n.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "107--113",
journal = "Clinical Lung Cancer",
issn = "1525-7304",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential for radiation therapy technology innovations to permit dose escalation for non-small-cell lung cancer

AU - Mañon, Rafael R.

AU - Jaradat, Hazim

AU - Patel, Rakesh

AU - Zhang, Tiezhi

AU - Fenwick, John

AU - Tome, Wolfgang A.

AU - Fowler, Jack

AU - Paliwal, Bhudatt

AU - Soisson, Emilie

AU - Yuan, Zhilong

AU - Mehta, Minesh

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Background: Innovations in radiation therapy (RT) technology could have the potential to allow for radiation dose escalation by evaluating tumor motion, minimizing and compensating for motion, and evaluating delivery technologies such as 3-dimensonal (3D) conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) using tomotherapy. Materials and methods: Ninety different RT plans were generated using 3 different treatment techniques for 10 patients. These were evaluated using dosimetric tools such as dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis, tumor equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and dosimetric parameters predictive for lung toxicity, such as the volume of lung receiving > 20 Gy of radiation (V20) and the normalized mean total radiation dose to the lung (NTDmean). The 3 techniques studied included free breathing using 3D CRT, 3D CRT with maximum-inspiration breath-hold (MIBH) to minimize tumor motion, and IMRT delivery with MIBH; the combination of 3 separate planning treatment-volume sets resulted in the generation of 90 different treatment plans. To plan these, patients underwent treatment-planning computed tomography in MIBH and free breathing followed by simulation with measurement of tumor motion and generation/ evaluation of DVHs, EUDs, V20, and NTDmean. Results: Average tumor motion was 1.54 cm in the cephalocaudad directions, 1.26 cm in the anteroposterior directions, and 0.56 cm in the lateral directions between maximum inspiration and expiration. Maximum-inspiration breath-hold produced superior lung sparing evidenced by lower V20 and NTDmean values, and these parameters predicted lower modeled pneumonitis rates. Tomotherapy-based IMRT provided further lung sparing. Conclusion: Treatment in MIBH results in lower V20 and NT Dmean values and lower modeled pneumonitis rates. This effect is enhanced by the use of IMRT. The use of MIBH with IMRT may therefore aid in escalating the dose in RT.

AB - Background: Innovations in radiation therapy (RT) technology could have the potential to allow for radiation dose escalation by evaluating tumor motion, minimizing and compensating for motion, and evaluating delivery technologies such as 3-dimensonal (3D) conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) using tomotherapy. Materials and methods: Ninety different RT plans were generated using 3 different treatment techniques for 10 patients. These were evaluated using dosimetric tools such as dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis, tumor equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and dosimetric parameters predictive for lung toxicity, such as the volume of lung receiving > 20 Gy of radiation (V20) and the normalized mean total radiation dose to the lung (NTDmean). The 3 techniques studied included free breathing using 3D CRT, 3D CRT with maximum-inspiration breath-hold (MIBH) to minimize tumor motion, and IMRT delivery with MIBH; the combination of 3 separate planning treatment-volume sets resulted in the generation of 90 different treatment plans. To plan these, patients underwent treatment-planning computed tomography in MIBH and free breathing followed by simulation with measurement of tumor motion and generation/ evaluation of DVHs, EUDs, V20, and NTDmean. Results: Average tumor motion was 1.54 cm in the cephalocaudad directions, 1.26 cm in the anteroposterior directions, and 0.56 cm in the lateral directions between maximum inspiration and expiration. Maximum-inspiration breath-hold produced superior lung sparing evidenced by lower V20 and NTDmean values, and these parameters predicted lower modeled pneumonitis rates. Tomotherapy-based IMRT provided further lung sparing. Conclusion: Treatment in MIBH results in lower V20 and NT Dmean values and lower modeled pneumonitis rates. This effect is enhanced by the use of IMRT. The use of MIBH with IMRT may therefore aid in escalating the dose in RT.

KW - Dose-volume histogram

KW - Maximum-inspiration breath-hold technique

KW - Pneumonitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32044459945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32044459945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3816/CLC.2005.n.025

DO - 10.3816/CLC.2005.n.025

M3 - Article

C2 - 16179097

AN - SCOPUS:32044459945

VL - 7

SP - 107

EP - 113

JO - Clinical Lung Cancer

JF - Clinical Lung Cancer

SN - 1525-7304

IS - 2

ER -