Population variation in migraine prevalence

A meta-analysis

Walter F. Stewart, David Simon, Aaron Shechter, Richard B. Lipton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

147 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A meta-analysis of published studies was conducted to identify factors which explained variation in estimates of migraine prevalence. Twenty-four population based studies contributed a total of 168 gender and age specific estimates of migraine prevalence. In linear regression analysis, 70.6% of the variation in these prevalence estimates was explained by gender, age (AGE + AGE2), a binary variable for case definition, and an interaction term between age and the case definition. Initially, we identified five groups of case definitions among the 24 studies. Only the definition of Waters (any 2 of warning, nausea, or unilateral pain) was associated with statistically significant differences in prevalence estimates among studies; accordingly the other 4 groups were combined. Several other factors were examined as predictors of migraine prevalence including the method of selecting the study population, the source of the population, the response rate and whether diagnoses were confirmed by a clinical assessment. None of these factors substantially increased explained variance. We conclude that after taking sociodemographic factors and case definition into account, estimates of migraine prevalence are remarkably stable among studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-280
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Migraine Disorders
Meta-Analysis
Population
Nausea
Linear Models
Regression Analysis
Pain
Water

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Headache
  • Migraine
  • Prevalence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Population variation in migraine prevalence : A meta-analysis. / Stewart, Walter F.; Simon, David; Shechter, Aaron; Lipton, Richard B.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 1995, p. 269-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stewart, Walter F. ; Simon, David ; Shechter, Aaron ; Lipton, Richard B. / Population variation in migraine prevalence : A meta-analysis. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1995 ; Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 269-280.
@article{6120173b53644069b24d853d43564093,
title = "Population variation in migraine prevalence: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "A meta-analysis of published studies was conducted to identify factors which explained variation in estimates of migraine prevalence. Twenty-four population based studies contributed a total of 168 gender and age specific estimates of migraine prevalence. In linear regression analysis, 70.6{\%} of the variation in these prevalence estimates was explained by gender, age (AGE + AGE2), a binary variable for case definition, and an interaction term between age and the case definition. Initially, we identified five groups of case definitions among the 24 studies. Only the definition of Waters (any 2 of warning, nausea, or unilateral pain) was associated with statistically significant differences in prevalence estimates among studies; accordingly the other 4 groups were combined. Several other factors were examined as predictors of migraine prevalence including the method of selecting the study population, the source of the population, the response rate and whether diagnoses were confirmed by a clinical assessment. None of these factors substantially increased explained variance. We conclude that after taking sociodemographic factors and case definition into account, estimates of migraine prevalence are remarkably stable among studies.",
keywords = "Epidemiology, Headache, Migraine, Prevalence",
author = "Stewart, {Walter F.} and David Simon and Aaron Shechter and Lipton, {Richard B.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0895-4356(94)00128-D",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "269--280",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Population variation in migraine prevalence

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Stewart, Walter F.

AU - Simon, David

AU - Shechter, Aaron

AU - Lipton, Richard B.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - A meta-analysis of published studies was conducted to identify factors which explained variation in estimates of migraine prevalence. Twenty-four population based studies contributed a total of 168 gender and age specific estimates of migraine prevalence. In linear regression analysis, 70.6% of the variation in these prevalence estimates was explained by gender, age (AGE + AGE2), a binary variable for case definition, and an interaction term between age and the case definition. Initially, we identified five groups of case definitions among the 24 studies. Only the definition of Waters (any 2 of warning, nausea, or unilateral pain) was associated with statistically significant differences in prevalence estimates among studies; accordingly the other 4 groups were combined. Several other factors were examined as predictors of migraine prevalence including the method of selecting the study population, the source of the population, the response rate and whether diagnoses were confirmed by a clinical assessment. None of these factors substantially increased explained variance. We conclude that after taking sociodemographic factors and case definition into account, estimates of migraine prevalence are remarkably stable among studies.

AB - A meta-analysis of published studies was conducted to identify factors which explained variation in estimates of migraine prevalence. Twenty-four population based studies contributed a total of 168 gender and age specific estimates of migraine prevalence. In linear regression analysis, 70.6% of the variation in these prevalence estimates was explained by gender, age (AGE + AGE2), a binary variable for case definition, and an interaction term between age and the case definition. Initially, we identified five groups of case definitions among the 24 studies. Only the definition of Waters (any 2 of warning, nausea, or unilateral pain) was associated with statistically significant differences in prevalence estimates among studies; accordingly the other 4 groups were combined. Several other factors were examined as predictors of migraine prevalence including the method of selecting the study population, the source of the population, the response rate and whether diagnoses were confirmed by a clinical assessment. None of these factors substantially increased explained variance. We conclude that after taking sociodemographic factors and case definition into account, estimates of migraine prevalence are remarkably stable among studies.

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Headache

KW - Migraine

KW - Prevalence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028907360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028907360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00128-D

DO - 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00128-D

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 269

EP - 280

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 2

ER -