Percutaneous treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A paradigm shift from pulmonary vein to non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation?

Domenico G. Della Rocca, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Chintan Trivedi, Luigi Di Biase, Andrea Natale

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pulmonary vein antrum isolation is the most effective rhythm control strategy in patients with paroxysmal AF. However, catheter ablation of non-paroxysmal AF has a lower success rate, even when persistent isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) is achieved. As a result of arrhythmia-related electophysiological and structural changes in the atria, sites other than the PVs can harbour triggers. These non-PV triggers contribute to AF relapse. In this article, we summarise the rationale and current evidence supporting the arrhythmogenic role of non-PV triggers and our ablation approach to patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)256-260
Number of pages5
JournalArrhythmia and Electrophysiology Review
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Veins
Atrial Fibrillation
Veins
Catheter Ablation
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Therapeutics
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Catheter ablation
  • Non-pulmonary vein trigger
  • Outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Percutaneous treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation : A paradigm shift from pulmonary vein to non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation? / Della Rocca, Domenico G.; Mohanty, Sanghamitra; Trivedi, Chintan; Di Biase, Luigi; Natale, Andrea.

In: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Review, Vol. 7, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 256-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e9c29518f9a649ea97b25bb8ced7ce9b,
title = "Percutaneous treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A paradigm shift from pulmonary vein to non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation?",
abstract = "Pulmonary vein antrum isolation is the most effective rhythm control strategy in patients with paroxysmal AF. However, catheter ablation of non-paroxysmal AF has a lower success rate, even when persistent isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) is achieved. As a result of arrhythmia-related electophysiological and structural changes in the atria, sites other than the PVs can harbour triggers. These non-PV triggers contribute to AF relapse. In this article, we summarise the rationale and current evidence supporting the arrhythmogenic role of non-PV triggers and our ablation approach to patients with non-paroxysmal AF.",
keywords = "Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Non-pulmonary vein trigger, Outcomes",
author = "{Della Rocca}, {Domenico G.} and Sanghamitra Mohanty and Chintan Trivedi and {Di Biase}, Luigi and Andrea Natale",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.15420/aer.2018.56.2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "256--260",
journal = "Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Review",
issn = "2050-3369",
publisher = "Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

T2 - A paradigm shift from pulmonary vein to non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation?

AU - Della Rocca, Domenico G.

AU - Mohanty, Sanghamitra

AU - Trivedi, Chintan

AU - Di Biase, Luigi

AU - Natale, Andrea

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Pulmonary vein antrum isolation is the most effective rhythm control strategy in patients with paroxysmal AF. However, catheter ablation of non-paroxysmal AF has a lower success rate, even when persistent isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) is achieved. As a result of arrhythmia-related electophysiological and structural changes in the atria, sites other than the PVs can harbour triggers. These non-PV triggers contribute to AF relapse. In this article, we summarise the rationale and current evidence supporting the arrhythmogenic role of non-PV triggers and our ablation approach to patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

AB - Pulmonary vein antrum isolation is the most effective rhythm control strategy in patients with paroxysmal AF. However, catheter ablation of non-paroxysmal AF has a lower success rate, even when persistent isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) is achieved. As a result of arrhythmia-related electophysiological and structural changes in the atria, sites other than the PVs can harbour triggers. These non-PV triggers contribute to AF relapse. In this article, we summarise the rationale and current evidence supporting the arrhythmogenic role of non-PV triggers and our ablation approach to patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Catheter ablation

KW - Non-pulmonary vein trigger

KW - Outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059617566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059617566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15420/aer.2018.56.2

DO - 10.15420/aer.2018.56.2

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85059617566

VL - 7

SP - 256

EP - 260

JO - Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Review

JF - Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Review

SN - 2050-3369

IS - 4

ER -