TY - JOUR
T1 - Peer Learning Through Multi-Institutional Web-based Case Conferences
T2 - Perceived Value (and Challenges) From Abdominal, Cardiothoracic, and Musculoskeletal Radiology Case Conference Participants
AU - Armstrong, Valerie
AU - Tan, Nelly
AU - Sekhar, Aarti
AU - Richardson, Michael L.
AU - Kanne, Jeffrey P.
AU - Sai, Victor
AU - Chernyak, Victoria
AU - Godwin, J. David
AU - Tammisetti, Varaha S.
AU - Eberhardt, Steven C.
AU - Henry, Travis S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Association of University Radiologists
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Rationale and Objectives: Peer learning is a case-based group-learning model intended to improve performance. In this descriptive paper, we describe multi-institutional, multi-subspecialty, web-based radiology case conferences and summarize the participants’ experiences. Materials and Methods: A semi-structured, 27-question survey was administered to radiologists participating in abdominal, cardiothoracic, and musculoskeletal case conferences. Survey questions included demographics, perceived educational value and challenges experienced. Survey question formats were continuous, binary, five-point Likert scale or text-based. The measures of central tendencies, proportions of responses and patterns were tabulated. Results: From 57 responders, 12/57 (21.1%) were abdominal, 16/57 (28.1%) were cardiothoracic, and 29/57 (50.8%) were musculoskeletal conference participants; 50/56 (89.3%) represented academic practice. Median age was 45 years (range 35–74); 43/57 (75.4%) were male. Geographically, 16/52 (30.8%) of participants were from the East Coast, 16/52 (30.8%) Midwest, 18/52 (34.6%) West Coast, and 2/52 (3.8%) International. The median reported educational value was 5/5 (interquartile range 5–5). Benefits of the case conference included education (50/95, 52.6%) and networking (39/95, 41.1%). Participants reported presenting the following cases: “great call" 32/48 (66.7%), learning opportunity 32/48 (66.7%), new knowledge 41/49 (83.7%), “zebras” 46/49 (93.9%), and procedural-based 16/46 (34.8%). All 51/51 (100%) of responders reportedly gained new knowledge, 49/51 (96.1%) became more open to group discussion, 34/51 (66.7%) changed search patterns, and 50/51 (98%) would continue to participate. Reported challenges included time zone differences and support from departments for a protected time to participate. Conclusion: Peer learning through multi-institutional case conferences provides educational and networking opportunities. Current challenges and desires include having department-supported protected time and ability to receive continuing medical education credit.
AB - Rationale and Objectives: Peer learning is a case-based group-learning model intended to improve performance. In this descriptive paper, we describe multi-institutional, multi-subspecialty, web-based radiology case conferences and summarize the participants’ experiences. Materials and Methods: A semi-structured, 27-question survey was administered to radiologists participating in abdominal, cardiothoracic, and musculoskeletal case conferences. Survey questions included demographics, perceived educational value and challenges experienced. Survey question formats were continuous, binary, five-point Likert scale or text-based. The measures of central tendencies, proportions of responses and patterns were tabulated. Results: From 57 responders, 12/57 (21.1%) were abdominal, 16/57 (28.1%) were cardiothoracic, and 29/57 (50.8%) were musculoskeletal conference participants; 50/56 (89.3%) represented academic practice. Median age was 45 years (range 35–74); 43/57 (75.4%) were male. Geographically, 16/52 (30.8%) of participants were from the East Coast, 16/52 (30.8%) Midwest, 18/52 (34.6%) West Coast, and 2/52 (3.8%) International. The median reported educational value was 5/5 (interquartile range 5–5). Benefits of the case conference included education (50/95, 52.6%) and networking (39/95, 41.1%). Participants reported presenting the following cases: “great call" 32/48 (66.7%), learning opportunity 32/48 (66.7%), new knowledge 41/49 (83.7%), “zebras” 46/49 (93.9%), and procedural-based 16/46 (34.8%). All 51/51 (100%) of responders reportedly gained new knowledge, 49/51 (96.1%) became more open to group discussion, 34/51 (66.7%) changed search patterns, and 50/51 (98%) would continue to participate. Reported challenges included time zone differences and support from departments for a protected time to participate. Conclusion: Peer learning through multi-institutional case conferences provides educational and networking opportunities. Current challenges and desires include having department-supported protected time and ability to receive continuing medical education credit.
KW - Educational
KW - Great call
KW - Group learning
KW - Learning opportunity
KW - Peer learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076542728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076542728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.009
DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 31848074
AN - SCOPUS:85076542728
SN - 1076-6332
VL - 27
SP - 1641
EP - 1646
JO - Academic Radiology
JF - Academic Radiology
IS - 11
ER -