Peer Learning Through Multi-Institutional Web-based Case Conferences: Perceived Value (and Challenges) From Abdominal, Cardiothoracic, and Musculoskeletal Radiology Case Conference Participants

Valerie Armstrong, Nelly Tan, Aarti Sekhar, Michael L. Richardson, Jeffrey P. Kanne, Victor Sai, Victoria Chernyak, J. David Godwin, Varaha S. Tammisetti, Steven C. Eberhardt, Travis S. Henry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: Peer learning is a case-based group-learning model intended to improve performance. In this descriptive paper, we describe multi-institutional, multi-subspecialty, web-based radiology case conferences and summarize the participants’ experiences. Materials and Methods: A semi-structured, 27-question survey was administered to radiologists participating in abdominal, cardiothoracic, and musculoskeletal case conferences. Survey questions included demographics, perceived educational value and challenges experienced. Survey question formats were continuous, binary, five-point Likert scale or text-based. The measures of central tendencies, proportions of responses and patterns were tabulated. Results: From 57 responders, 12/57 (21.1%) were abdominal, 16/57 (28.1%) were cardiothoracic, and 29/57 (50.8%) were musculoskeletal conference participants; 50/56 (89.3%) represented academic practice. Median age was 45 years (range 35–74); 43/57 (75.4%) were male. Geographically, 16/52 (30.8%) of participants were from the East Coast, 16/52 (30.8%) Midwest, 18/52 (34.6%) West Coast, and 2/52 (3.8%) International. The median reported educational value was 5/5 (interquartile range 5–5). Benefits of the case conference included education (50/95, 52.6%) and networking (39/95, 41.1%). Participants reported presenting the following cases: “great call" 32/48 (66.7%), learning opportunity 32/48 (66.7%), new knowledge 41/49 (83.7%), “zebras” 46/49 (93.9%), and procedural-based 16/46 (34.8%). All 51/51 (100%) of responders reportedly gained new knowledge, 49/51 (96.1%) became more open to group discussion, 34/51 (66.7%) changed search patterns, and 50/51 (98%) would continue to participate. Reported challenges included time zone differences and support from departments for a protected time to participate. Conclusion: Peer learning through multi-institutional case conferences provides educational and networking opportunities. Current challenges and desires include having department-supported protected time and ability to receive continuing medical education credit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Radiology
Learning
Continuing Medical Education
Aptitude
Equidae
Demography
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Educational
  • Great call
  • Group learning
  • Learning opportunity
  • Peer learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Peer Learning Through Multi-Institutional Web-based Case Conferences : Perceived Value (and Challenges) From Abdominal, Cardiothoracic, and Musculoskeletal Radiology Case Conference Participants. / Armstrong, Valerie; Tan, Nelly; Sekhar, Aarti; Richardson, Michael L.; Kanne, Jeffrey P.; Sai, Victor; Chernyak, Victoria; Godwin, J. David; Tammisetti, Varaha S.; Eberhardt, Steven C.; Henry, Travis S.

In: Academic Radiology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Armstrong, Valerie ; Tan, Nelly ; Sekhar, Aarti ; Richardson, Michael L. ; Kanne, Jeffrey P. ; Sai, Victor ; Chernyak, Victoria ; Godwin, J. David ; Tammisetti, Varaha S. ; Eberhardt, Steven C. ; Henry, Travis S. / Peer Learning Through Multi-Institutional Web-based Case Conferences : Perceived Value (and Challenges) From Abdominal, Cardiothoracic, and Musculoskeletal Radiology Case Conference Participants. In: Academic Radiology. 2019.
@article{fde36c54d25d41689712d8bf06edc667,
title = "Peer Learning Through Multi-Institutional Web-based Case Conferences: Perceived Value (and Challenges) From Abdominal, Cardiothoracic, and Musculoskeletal Radiology Case Conference Participants",
abstract = "Rationale and Objectives: Peer learning is a case-based group-learning model intended to improve performance. In this descriptive paper, we describe multi-institutional, multi-subspecialty, web-based radiology case conferences and summarize the participants’ experiences. Materials and Methods: A semi-structured, 27-question survey was administered to radiologists participating in abdominal, cardiothoracic, and musculoskeletal case conferences. Survey questions included demographics, perceived educational value and challenges experienced. Survey question formats were continuous, binary, five-point Likert scale or text-based. The measures of central tendencies, proportions of responses and patterns were tabulated. Results: From 57 responders, 12/57 (21.1{\%}) were abdominal, 16/57 (28.1{\%}) were cardiothoracic, and 29/57 (50.8{\%}) were musculoskeletal conference participants; 50/56 (89.3{\%}) represented academic practice. Median age was 45 years (range 35–74); 43/57 (75.4{\%}) were male. Geographically, 16/52 (30.8{\%}) of participants were from the East Coast, 16/52 (30.8{\%}) Midwest, 18/52 (34.6{\%}) West Coast, and 2/52 (3.8{\%}) International. The median reported educational value was 5/5 (interquartile range 5–5). Benefits of the case conference included education (50/95, 52.6{\%}) and networking (39/95, 41.1{\%}). Participants reported presenting the following cases: “great call{"} 32/48 (66.7{\%}), learning opportunity 32/48 (66.7{\%}), new knowledge 41/49 (83.7{\%}), “zebras” 46/49 (93.9{\%}), and procedural-based 16/46 (34.8{\%}). All 51/51 (100{\%}) of responders reportedly gained new knowledge, 49/51 (96.1{\%}) became more open to group discussion, 34/51 (66.7{\%}) changed search patterns, and 50/51 (98{\%}) would continue to participate. Reported challenges included time zone differences and support from departments for a protected time to participate. Conclusion: Peer learning through multi-institutional case conferences provides educational and networking opportunities. Current challenges and desires include having department-supported protected time and ability to receive continuing medical education credit.",
keywords = "Educational, Great call, Group learning, Learning opportunity, Peer learning",
author = "Valerie Armstrong and Nelly Tan and Aarti Sekhar and Richardson, {Michael L.} and Kanne, {Jeffrey P.} and Victor Sai and Victoria Chernyak and Godwin, {J. David} and Tammisetti, {Varaha S.} and Eberhardt, {Steven C.} and Henry, {Travis S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.009",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer Learning Through Multi-Institutional Web-based Case Conferences

T2 - Perceived Value (and Challenges) From Abdominal, Cardiothoracic, and Musculoskeletal Radiology Case Conference Participants

AU - Armstrong, Valerie

AU - Tan, Nelly

AU - Sekhar, Aarti

AU - Richardson, Michael L.

AU - Kanne, Jeffrey P.

AU - Sai, Victor

AU - Chernyak, Victoria

AU - Godwin, J. David

AU - Tammisetti, Varaha S.

AU - Eberhardt, Steven C.

AU - Henry, Travis S.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Rationale and Objectives: Peer learning is a case-based group-learning model intended to improve performance. In this descriptive paper, we describe multi-institutional, multi-subspecialty, web-based radiology case conferences and summarize the participants’ experiences. Materials and Methods: A semi-structured, 27-question survey was administered to radiologists participating in abdominal, cardiothoracic, and musculoskeletal case conferences. Survey questions included demographics, perceived educational value and challenges experienced. Survey question formats were continuous, binary, five-point Likert scale or text-based. The measures of central tendencies, proportions of responses and patterns were tabulated. Results: From 57 responders, 12/57 (21.1%) were abdominal, 16/57 (28.1%) were cardiothoracic, and 29/57 (50.8%) were musculoskeletal conference participants; 50/56 (89.3%) represented academic practice. Median age was 45 years (range 35–74); 43/57 (75.4%) were male. Geographically, 16/52 (30.8%) of participants were from the East Coast, 16/52 (30.8%) Midwest, 18/52 (34.6%) West Coast, and 2/52 (3.8%) International. The median reported educational value was 5/5 (interquartile range 5–5). Benefits of the case conference included education (50/95, 52.6%) and networking (39/95, 41.1%). Participants reported presenting the following cases: “great call" 32/48 (66.7%), learning opportunity 32/48 (66.7%), new knowledge 41/49 (83.7%), “zebras” 46/49 (93.9%), and procedural-based 16/46 (34.8%). All 51/51 (100%) of responders reportedly gained new knowledge, 49/51 (96.1%) became more open to group discussion, 34/51 (66.7%) changed search patterns, and 50/51 (98%) would continue to participate. Reported challenges included time zone differences and support from departments for a protected time to participate. Conclusion: Peer learning through multi-institutional case conferences provides educational and networking opportunities. Current challenges and desires include having department-supported protected time and ability to receive continuing medical education credit.

AB - Rationale and Objectives: Peer learning is a case-based group-learning model intended to improve performance. In this descriptive paper, we describe multi-institutional, multi-subspecialty, web-based radiology case conferences and summarize the participants’ experiences. Materials and Methods: A semi-structured, 27-question survey was administered to radiologists participating in abdominal, cardiothoracic, and musculoskeletal case conferences. Survey questions included demographics, perceived educational value and challenges experienced. Survey question formats were continuous, binary, five-point Likert scale or text-based. The measures of central tendencies, proportions of responses and patterns were tabulated. Results: From 57 responders, 12/57 (21.1%) were abdominal, 16/57 (28.1%) were cardiothoracic, and 29/57 (50.8%) were musculoskeletal conference participants; 50/56 (89.3%) represented academic practice. Median age was 45 years (range 35–74); 43/57 (75.4%) were male. Geographically, 16/52 (30.8%) of participants were from the East Coast, 16/52 (30.8%) Midwest, 18/52 (34.6%) West Coast, and 2/52 (3.8%) International. The median reported educational value was 5/5 (interquartile range 5–5). Benefits of the case conference included education (50/95, 52.6%) and networking (39/95, 41.1%). Participants reported presenting the following cases: “great call" 32/48 (66.7%), learning opportunity 32/48 (66.7%), new knowledge 41/49 (83.7%), “zebras” 46/49 (93.9%), and procedural-based 16/46 (34.8%). All 51/51 (100%) of responders reportedly gained new knowledge, 49/51 (96.1%) became more open to group discussion, 34/51 (66.7%) changed search patterns, and 50/51 (98%) would continue to participate. Reported challenges included time zone differences and support from departments for a protected time to participate. Conclusion: Peer learning through multi-institutional case conferences provides educational and networking opportunities. Current challenges and desires include having department-supported protected time and ability to receive continuing medical education credit.

KW - Educational

KW - Great call

KW - Group learning

KW - Learning opportunity

KW - Peer learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076542728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076542728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85076542728

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

ER -