Pay for performance improves quality across demographic groups

Rohit Bhalla, Clyde B. Schechter, Alvin H. Strelnick, Nandini Deb, Paul Meissner, Brian P. Currie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate quality and the effect of pay for performance among minority patient groups, during a pay-for-performance program in 22 primary care practice sites. METHODS: Data were collected on 26 standardized measures of care for 2 measurement cycles. Proportions of recommended care received across 5 composite quality domains were analyzed by demographic group. Regression models including significant covariates were constructed. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were derived to assess the effect of pay of performance within demographic groups. RESULTS: Improvements were observed from 2007 to 2009 for all patients in each of 5 composite quality domains of diabetes, coronary artery disease, heart failure, screening and prevention, and all care. With the exception of heart failure care for Hispanic/Latino and Spanish language-preferring patients, improvement was observed in all domains for African American/black race, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and Spanish language-preferred groups. Following adjustment for covariates, pay for performance was associated with significant improvement in all-patient diabetes care (adjusted OR = 1.15; [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.22), screening and prevention (adjusted OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.41-1.69), and all care (adjusted OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.20-1.35). Significant improvements were also observed within the minority demographic groups noted earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Pay-for-performance programs structured as additional incentive monies for providers improved care for all patients and among minority groups, in whom disparities have historically been observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-209
Number of pages11
JournalQuality Management in Health Care
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Incentive Reimbursement
Hispanic Americans
Minority Groups
Demography
Odds Ratio
performance
Confidence Intervals
Group
Patient Care
Language
Heart Failure
Spanish language
confidence
minority
chronic illness
African Americans
Motivation
Coronary Artery Disease
Primary Health Care
language group

Keywords

  • Ambulatory care
  • Health care disparities
  • Pay for performance
  • Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Care Planning
  • Health(social science)
  • Leadership and Management
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Pay for performance improves quality across demographic groups. / Bhalla, Rohit; Schechter, Clyde B.; Strelnick, Alvin H.; Deb, Nandini; Meissner, Paul; Currie, Brian P.

In: Quality Management in Health Care, Vol. 22, No. 3, 07.2013, p. 199-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{14b420d9cce449a2b8caf609a0807cc7,
title = "Pay for performance improves quality across demographic groups",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate quality and the effect of pay for performance among minority patient groups, during a pay-for-performance program in 22 primary care practice sites. METHODS: Data were collected on 26 standardized measures of care for 2 measurement cycles. Proportions of recommended care received across 5 composite quality domains were analyzed by demographic group. Regression models including significant covariates were constructed. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were derived to assess the effect of pay of performance within demographic groups. RESULTS: Improvements were observed from 2007 to 2009 for all patients in each of 5 composite quality domains of diabetes, coronary artery disease, heart failure, screening and prevention, and all care. With the exception of heart failure care for Hispanic/Latino and Spanish language-preferring patients, improvement was observed in all domains for African American/black race, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and Spanish language-preferred groups. Following adjustment for covariates, pay for performance was associated with significant improvement in all-patient diabetes care (adjusted OR = 1.15; [95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.22), screening and prevention (adjusted OR = 1.55; 95{\%} CI, 1.41-1.69), and all care (adjusted OR = 1.27; 95{\%} CI, 1.20-1.35). Significant improvements were also observed within the minority demographic groups noted earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Pay-for-performance programs structured as additional incentive monies for providers improved care for all patients and among minority groups, in whom disparities have historically been observed.",
keywords = "Ambulatory care, Health care disparities, Pay for performance, Quality improvement",
author = "Rohit Bhalla and Schechter, {Clyde B.} and Strelnick, {Alvin H.} and Nandini Deb and Paul Meissner and Currie, {Brian P.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/QMH.0b013e31829a6b4f",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "199--209",
journal = "Quality Management in Health Care",
issn = "1063-8628",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pay for performance improves quality across demographic groups

AU - Bhalla, Rohit

AU - Schechter, Clyde B.

AU - Strelnick, Alvin H.

AU - Deb, Nandini

AU - Meissner, Paul

AU - Currie, Brian P.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate quality and the effect of pay for performance among minority patient groups, during a pay-for-performance program in 22 primary care practice sites. METHODS: Data were collected on 26 standardized measures of care for 2 measurement cycles. Proportions of recommended care received across 5 composite quality domains were analyzed by demographic group. Regression models including significant covariates were constructed. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were derived to assess the effect of pay of performance within demographic groups. RESULTS: Improvements were observed from 2007 to 2009 for all patients in each of 5 composite quality domains of diabetes, coronary artery disease, heart failure, screening and prevention, and all care. With the exception of heart failure care for Hispanic/Latino and Spanish language-preferring patients, improvement was observed in all domains for African American/black race, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and Spanish language-preferred groups. Following adjustment for covariates, pay for performance was associated with significant improvement in all-patient diabetes care (adjusted OR = 1.15; [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.22), screening and prevention (adjusted OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.41-1.69), and all care (adjusted OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.20-1.35). Significant improvements were also observed within the minority demographic groups noted earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Pay-for-performance programs structured as additional incentive monies for providers improved care for all patients and among minority groups, in whom disparities have historically been observed.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate quality and the effect of pay for performance among minority patient groups, during a pay-for-performance program in 22 primary care practice sites. METHODS: Data were collected on 26 standardized measures of care for 2 measurement cycles. Proportions of recommended care received across 5 composite quality domains were analyzed by demographic group. Regression models including significant covariates were constructed. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were derived to assess the effect of pay of performance within demographic groups. RESULTS: Improvements were observed from 2007 to 2009 for all patients in each of 5 composite quality domains of diabetes, coronary artery disease, heart failure, screening and prevention, and all care. With the exception of heart failure care for Hispanic/Latino and Spanish language-preferring patients, improvement was observed in all domains for African American/black race, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and Spanish language-preferred groups. Following adjustment for covariates, pay for performance was associated with significant improvement in all-patient diabetes care (adjusted OR = 1.15; [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.22), screening and prevention (adjusted OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.41-1.69), and all care (adjusted OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.20-1.35). Significant improvements were also observed within the minority demographic groups noted earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Pay-for-performance programs structured as additional incentive monies for providers improved care for all patients and among minority groups, in whom disparities have historically been observed.

KW - Ambulatory care

KW - Health care disparities

KW - Pay for performance

KW - Quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880087039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880087039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31829a6b4f

DO - 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31829a6b4f

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 199

EP - 209

JO - Quality Management in Health Care

JF - Quality Management in Health Care

SN - 1063-8628

IS - 3

ER -