Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in contemporary clinical practice

Nitya E. Abraham, Neil Mendhiratta, Samir S. Taneja

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in men with a previous negative biopsy and 2) identify predictors of prostate cancer diagnosis on repeat biopsy in these men. Materials and Methods From a university faculty group practice we identified 1,837 men who underwent prostate biopsy between January 1, 1995 and January 1, 2010. Characteristics of repeat biopsy were examined, including the indication for biopsy, the number of repeat biopsies performed, the number of cores obtained and total prostate specific antigen before biopsy. Features of prostate cancer diagnosed on repeat biopsy were examined, including Gleason score, number of positive cores, percent of tumor and treatment choice. Multivariable logistic regression was done to identify prostate cancer predictors. Results Initial biopsy was negative in 1,213 men. In 255 men a total of 798 repeat biopsies were performed. Of the 63 men diagnosed with prostate cancer Gleason score was 6 or less in 33 (52%), 7 in 22 (35%) and 8-9 in 8 (13%). When categorized by Epstein criteria, the rate of clinically insignificant cancer diagnosis decreased substantially by the third and fourth repeat biopsies. Repeat biopsy in men older than 70 years, biopsies including more than 20 cores and the fourth repeat biopsy were associated with an increased likelihood of prostate cancer diagnosis. Conclusions In men selected for multiple repeat biopsies clinically significant cancer is found at each sampling round. Given the continued likelihood of cancer detection even by the fifth biopsy, early consideration of saturation or image guided biopsy may be warranted in the repeat biopsy population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1178-1184
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume193
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostate
Biopsy
Prostatic Neoplasms
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasms
Image-Guided Biopsy
Group Practice
Prostate-Specific Antigen

Keywords

  • biopsy
  • diagnosis
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • prostate
  • prostatic neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in contemporary clinical practice. / Abraham, Nitya E.; Mendhiratta, Neil; Taneja, Samir S.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 193, No. 4, 01.04.2015, p. 1178-1184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abraham, Nitya E. ; Mendhiratta, Neil ; Taneja, Samir S. / Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in contemporary clinical practice. In: Journal of Urology. 2015 ; Vol. 193, No. 4. pp. 1178-1184.
@article{f62cdee1d5494ec7a57814ae2714a44f,
title = "Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in contemporary clinical practice",
abstract = "Purpose The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in men with a previous negative biopsy and 2) identify predictors of prostate cancer diagnosis on repeat biopsy in these men. Materials and Methods From a university faculty group practice we identified 1,837 men who underwent prostate biopsy between January 1, 1995 and January 1, 2010. Characteristics of repeat biopsy were examined, including the indication for biopsy, the number of repeat biopsies performed, the number of cores obtained and total prostate specific antigen before biopsy. Features of prostate cancer diagnosed on repeat biopsy were examined, including Gleason score, number of positive cores, percent of tumor and treatment choice. Multivariable logistic regression was done to identify prostate cancer predictors. Results Initial biopsy was negative in 1,213 men. In 255 men a total of 798 repeat biopsies were performed. Of the 63 men diagnosed with prostate cancer Gleason score was 6 or less in 33 (52{\%}), 7 in 22 (35{\%}) and 8-9 in 8 (13{\%}). When categorized by Epstein criteria, the rate of clinically insignificant cancer diagnosis decreased substantially by the third and fourth repeat biopsies. Repeat biopsy in men older than 70 years, biopsies including more than 20 cores and the fourth repeat biopsy were associated with an increased likelihood of prostate cancer diagnosis. Conclusions In men selected for multiple repeat biopsies clinically significant cancer is found at each sampling round. Given the continued likelihood of cancer detection even by the fifth biopsy, early consideration of saturation or image guided biopsy may be warranted in the repeat biopsy population.",
keywords = "biopsy, diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging, prostate, prostatic neoplasms",
author = "Abraham, {Nitya E.} and Neil Mendhiratta and Taneja, {Samir S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.084",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "193",
pages = "1178--1184",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in contemporary clinical practice

AU - Abraham, Nitya E.

AU - Mendhiratta, Neil

AU - Taneja, Samir S.

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Purpose The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in men with a previous negative biopsy and 2) identify predictors of prostate cancer diagnosis on repeat biopsy in these men. Materials and Methods From a university faculty group practice we identified 1,837 men who underwent prostate biopsy between January 1, 1995 and January 1, 2010. Characteristics of repeat biopsy were examined, including the indication for biopsy, the number of repeat biopsies performed, the number of cores obtained and total prostate specific antigen before biopsy. Features of prostate cancer diagnosed on repeat biopsy were examined, including Gleason score, number of positive cores, percent of tumor and treatment choice. Multivariable logistic regression was done to identify prostate cancer predictors. Results Initial biopsy was negative in 1,213 men. In 255 men a total of 798 repeat biopsies were performed. Of the 63 men diagnosed with prostate cancer Gleason score was 6 or less in 33 (52%), 7 in 22 (35%) and 8-9 in 8 (13%). When categorized by Epstein criteria, the rate of clinically insignificant cancer diagnosis decreased substantially by the third and fourth repeat biopsies. Repeat biopsy in men older than 70 years, biopsies including more than 20 cores and the fourth repeat biopsy were associated with an increased likelihood of prostate cancer diagnosis. Conclusions In men selected for multiple repeat biopsies clinically significant cancer is found at each sampling round. Given the continued likelihood of cancer detection even by the fifth biopsy, early consideration of saturation or image guided biopsy may be warranted in the repeat biopsy population.

AB - Purpose The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in men with a previous negative biopsy and 2) identify predictors of prostate cancer diagnosis on repeat biopsy in these men. Materials and Methods From a university faculty group practice we identified 1,837 men who underwent prostate biopsy between January 1, 1995 and January 1, 2010. Characteristics of repeat biopsy were examined, including the indication for biopsy, the number of repeat biopsies performed, the number of cores obtained and total prostate specific antigen before biopsy. Features of prostate cancer diagnosed on repeat biopsy were examined, including Gleason score, number of positive cores, percent of tumor and treatment choice. Multivariable logistic regression was done to identify prostate cancer predictors. Results Initial biopsy was negative in 1,213 men. In 255 men a total of 798 repeat biopsies were performed. Of the 63 men diagnosed with prostate cancer Gleason score was 6 or less in 33 (52%), 7 in 22 (35%) and 8-9 in 8 (13%). When categorized by Epstein criteria, the rate of clinically insignificant cancer diagnosis decreased substantially by the third and fourth repeat biopsies. Repeat biopsy in men older than 70 years, biopsies including more than 20 cores and the fourth repeat biopsy were associated with an increased likelihood of prostate cancer diagnosis. Conclusions In men selected for multiple repeat biopsies clinically significant cancer is found at each sampling round. Given the continued likelihood of cancer detection even by the fifth biopsy, early consideration of saturation or image guided biopsy may be warranted in the repeat biopsy population.

KW - biopsy

KW - diagnosis

KW - magnetic resonance imaging

KW - prostate

KW - prostatic neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926419395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926419395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.084

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.084

M3 - Article

C2 - 25444971

AN - SCOPUS:84926419395

VL - 193

SP - 1178

EP - 1184

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -