Patient and practitioner perspectives on postoperative pain control in Kumasi, Ghana

S. Murthy, A. Antwi-Kusi, A. R. Jabir, G. Ofori-Amanfo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The treatment of pain has gained momentum in health care around the world. Nevertheless, pain is undertreated, particularly in the developing world. We sought to compare patient and healthcare practitioner perspectives of postoperative pain and assess perioperative analgesia utilisation in a tertiary care hospital in a resource-limited setting. Design: We conducted a prospective observational study. Setting and subjects: Postoperative patients and their respective recovery room nurses were studied at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. Outcome measures: Patients were surveyed 1-4 hours postoperatively. Pain severity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) and patient satisfaction with the pain control were assessed. Recovery room nurses who were responsible for administering the pain medications were surveyed on their perceptions of their patients' pain. Patient demographic information, diagnoses, surgery type, mode of anaesthesia and perioperative analgesia use were recorded. Results: One hundred and four patients aged 42.1 years ± 17.8 were interviewed over an eight-week period in 2010. Of the 104 patients, 58 (55.8%) underwent general anaesthesia and 39 (37.5%) spinal anaesthesia. Seventy-eight patients (75%) received intraoperative analgesia. Eighty-nine patients (86.5%) were prescribed postoperative analgesia. Only 27 (26%) had received any analgesia by the time they were surveyed. All postoperative analgesia was administered intramuscularly. Thirtysix patients (34.6%) rated their pain as severe (NRS 7-10). Overall, nurses perceived patients' pain to be lower than patients' own rating [a mean difference 1.26 units, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-1.95, p-value < 0.001]. Patients were 2.77 times as likely to rate their pain as severe compared to nurses (relative risk: 2.77, 95% CI: 1.56-4.91). Conclusion: There was significant discrepancy in the perception of pain between patients and healthcare providers. Simple pain assessment tools and the early institution of intravenous postoperative analgesia may improve postoperative pain assessment and treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)102-107
Number of pages6
JournalSouthern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia
Volume19
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ghana
Postoperative Pain
Pain
Analgesia
Nurses
Recovery Room
Pain Measurement
Confidence Intervals
Delivery of Health Care
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Pain Perception
Spinal Anesthesia
Tertiary Healthcare
Patient Satisfaction
Tertiary Care Centers
Teaching Hospitals
Health Personnel
General Anesthesia
Observational Studies

Keywords

  • Ghana
  • Pain assessment
  • Pain treatment
  • Perception
  • Postoperative pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Patient and practitioner perspectives on postoperative pain control in Kumasi, Ghana. / Murthy, S.; Antwi-Kusi, A.; Jabir, A. R.; Ofori-Amanfo, G.

In: Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2013, p. 102-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murthy, S, Antwi-Kusi, A, Jabir, AR & Ofori-Amanfo, G 2013, 'Patient and practitioner perspectives on postoperative pain control in Kumasi, Ghana', Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 102-107.
Murthy, S. ; Antwi-Kusi, A. ; Jabir, A. R. ; Ofori-Amanfo, G. / Patient and practitioner perspectives on postoperative pain control in Kumasi, Ghana. In: Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 2013 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 102-107.
@article{fb451e9131604be0b5c83c8fc92623ec,
title = "Patient and practitioner perspectives on postoperative pain control in Kumasi, Ghana",
abstract = "Objective: The treatment of pain has gained momentum in health care around the world. Nevertheless, pain is undertreated, particularly in the developing world. We sought to compare patient and healthcare practitioner perspectives of postoperative pain and assess perioperative analgesia utilisation in a tertiary care hospital in a resource-limited setting. Design: We conducted a prospective observational study. Setting and subjects: Postoperative patients and their respective recovery room nurses were studied at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. Outcome measures: Patients were surveyed 1-4 hours postoperatively. Pain severity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) and patient satisfaction with the pain control were assessed. Recovery room nurses who were responsible for administering the pain medications were surveyed on their perceptions of their patients' pain. Patient demographic information, diagnoses, surgery type, mode of anaesthesia and perioperative analgesia use were recorded. Results: One hundred and four patients aged 42.1 years ± 17.8 were interviewed over an eight-week period in 2010. Of the 104 patients, 58 (55.8{\%}) underwent general anaesthesia and 39 (37.5{\%}) spinal anaesthesia. Seventy-eight patients (75{\%}) received intraoperative analgesia. Eighty-nine patients (86.5{\%}) were prescribed postoperative analgesia. Only 27 (26{\%}) had received any analgesia by the time they were surveyed. All postoperative analgesia was administered intramuscularly. Thirtysix patients (34.6{\%}) rated their pain as severe (NRS 7-10). Overall, nurses perceived patients' pain to be lower than patients' own rating [a mean difference 1.26 units, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI): 0.57-1.95, p-value < 0.001]. Patients were 2.77 times as likely to rate their pain as severe compared to nurses (relative risk: 2.77, 95{\%} CI: 1.56-4.91). Conclusion: There was significant discrepancy in the perception of pain between patients and healthcare providers. Simple pain assessment tools and the early institution of intravenous postoperative analgesia may improve postoperative pain assessment and treatment.",
keywords = "Ghana, Pain assessment, Pain treatment, Perception, Postoperative pain",
author = "S. Murthy and A. Antwi-Kusi and Jabir, {A. R.} and G. Ofori-Amanfo",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "102--107",
journal = "Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "1027-9148",
publisher = "In House Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient and practitioner perspectives on postoperative pain control in Kumasi, Ghana

AU - Murthy, S.

AU - Antwi-Kusi, A.

AU - Jabir, A. R.

AU - Ofori-Amanfo, G.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Objective: The treatment of pain has gained momentum in health care around the world. Nevertheless, pain is undertreated, particularly in the developing world. We sought to compare patient and healthcare practitioner perspectives of postoperative pain and assess perioperative analgesia utilisation in a tertiary care hospital in a resource-limited setting. Design: We conducted a prospective observational study. Setting and subjects: Postoperative patients and their respective recovery room nurses were studied at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. Outcome measures: Patients were surveyed 1-4 hours postoperatively. Pain severity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) and patient satisfaction with the pain control were assessed. Recovery room nurses who were responsible for administering the pain medications were surveyed on their perceptions of their patients' pain. Patient demographic information, diagnoses, surgery type, mode of anaesthesia and perioperative analgesia use were recorded. Results: One hundred and four patients aged 42.1 years ± 17.8 were interviewed over an eight-week period in 2010. Of the 104 patients, 58 (55.8%) underwent general anaesthesia and 39 (37.5%) spinal anaesthesia. Seventy-eight patients (75%) received intraoperative analgesia. Eighty-nine patients (86.5%) were prescribed postoperative analgesia. Only 27 (26%) had received any analgesia by the time they were surveyed. All postoperative analgesia was administered intramuscularly. Thirtysix patients (34.6%) rated their pain as severe (NRS 7-10). Overall, nurses perceived patients' pain to be lower than patients' own rating [a mean difference 1.26 units, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-1.95, p-value < 0.001]. Patients were 2.77 times as likely to rate their pain as severe compared to nurses (relative risk: 2.77, 95% CI: 1.56-4.91). Conclusion: There was significant discrepancy in the perception of pain between patients and healthcare providers. Simple pain assessment tools and the early institution of intravenous postoperative analgesia may improve postoperative pain assessment and treatment.

AB - Objective: The treatment of pain has gained momentum in health care around the world. Nevertheless, pain is undertreated, particularly in the developing world. We sought to compare patient and healthcare practitioner perspectives of postoperative pain and assess perioperative analgesia utilisation in a tertiary care hospital in a resource-limited setting. Design: We conducted a prospective observational study. Setting and subjects: Postoperative patients and their respective recovery room nurses were studied at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. Outcome measures: Patients were surveyed 1-4 hours postoperatively. Pain severity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) and patient satisfaction with the pain control were assessed. Recovery room nurses who were responsible for administering the pain medications were surveyed on their perceptions of their patients' pain. Patient demographic information, diagnoses, surgery type, mode of anaesthesia and perioperative analgesia use were recorded. Results: One hundred and four patients aged 42.1 years ± 17.8 were interviewed over an eight-week period in 2010. Of the 104 patients, 58 (55.8%) underwent general anaesthesia and 39 (37.5%) spinal anaesthesia. Seventy-eight patients (75%) received intraoperative analgesia. Eighty-nine patients (86.5%) were prescribed postoperative analgesia. Only 27 (26%) had received any analgesia by the time they were surveyed. All postoperative analgesia was administered intramuscularly. Thirtysix patients (34.6%) rated their pain as severe (NRS 7-10). Overall, nurses perceived patients' pain to be lower than patients' own rating [a mean difference 1.26 units, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-1.95, p-value < 0.001]. Patients were 2.77 times as likely to rate their pain as severe compared to nurses (relative risk: 2.77, 95% CI: 1.56-4.91). Conclusion: There was significant discrepancy in the perception of pain between patients and healthcare providers. Simple pain assessment tools and the early institution of intravenous postoperative analgesia may improve postoperative pain assessment and treatment.

KW - Ghana

KW - Pain assessment

KW - Pain treatment

KW - Perception

KW - Postoperative pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876751497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876751497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 102

EP - 107

JO - Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 1027-9148

IS - 2

ER -