Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Device longevity is more important than smaller size: The patient's viewpoint

David M. Wild, John Devens Fisher, Soo G. Kim, Kevin J. Ferrick, Jay N. Gross, Eugen C. Palma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The size of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) has been diminishing progressively. If two devices are otherwise identical in components, features and technology, the one with a larger battery should have a longer service life. Therefore, patients who receive smaller devices may require more frequent surgery to replace the devices. It is uncertain whether this tradeoff for smaller size is desired by patients. We surveyed 156 patients to determine whether patients prefer a larger, longer-lasting device, or a smaller device that is less noticeable but requires more frequent surgery. The effects of subgroups were evaluated; these included body habitus, age, gender, and patients seen at time of pulse generator replacement (PGR), initial implant, or follow-up. Among 156 patients surveyed, 151 expressed a preference. Of these, 90.1% preferred the larger device and 9.9% the smaller device (P < 0.0001). Among thin patients, 79.5% preferred a larger device. Ninety percent of males and 89.2% of females selected the larger device. Among younger patients (≤ 72 years), 89.6% preferred the larger device, as did 90.5% of older patients (> 72 years). Of patients undergoing PGR or initial implants, 95% favored the larger device, as did 86% of patients presenting for follow-up. The vast majority of patients prefer a larger device to reduce the number of potential replacement operations. This preference crosses the spectrum of those with a previously implanted device, those undergoing initial implants, those returning for routine follow-up, and patients of various ages, gender, and habitus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1526-1529
Number of pages4
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume27
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2004

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Equipment and Supplies
Technology

Keywords

  • ICD longevity
  • ICD size
  • Pacemaker longevity
  • Pacemaker size
  • Patient preference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

@article{4e4d4ee37da8409898a03b4532dbfbfd,
title = "Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Device longevity is more important than smaller size: The patient's viewpoint",
abstract = "The size of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) has been diminishing progressively. If two devices are otherwise identical in components, features and technology, the one with a larger battery should have a longer service life. Therefore, patients who receive smaller devices may require more frequent surgery to replace the devices. It is uncertain whether this tradeoff for smaller size is desired by patients. We surveyed 156 patients to determine whether patients prefer a larger, longer-lasting device, or a smaller device that is less noticeable but requires more frequent surgery. The effects of subgroups were evaluated; these included body habitus, age, gender, and patients seen at time of pulse generator replacement (PGR), initial implant, or follow-up. Among 156 patients surveyed, 151 expressed a preference. Of these, 90.1{\%} preferred the larger device and 9.9{\%} the smaller device (P < 0.0001). Among thin patients, 79.5{\%} preferred a larger device. Ninety percent of males and 89.2{\%} of females selected the larger device. Among younger patients (≤ 72 years), 89.6{\%} preferred the larger device, as did 90.5{\%} of older patients (> 72 years). Of patients undergoing PGR or initial implants, 95{\%} favored the larger device, as did 86{\%} of patients presenting for follow-up. The vast majority of patients prefer a larger device to reduce the number of potential replacement operations. This preference crosses the spectrum of those with a previously implanted device, those undergoing initial implants, those returning for routine follow-up, and patients of various ages, gender, and habitus.",
keywords = "ICD longevity, ICD size, Pacemaker longevity, Pacemaker size, Patient preference",
author = "Wild, {David M.} and Fisher, {John Devens} and Kim, {Soo G.} and Ferrick, {Kevin J.} and Gross, {Jay N.} and Palma, {Eugen C.}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00671.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1526--1529",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators

T2 - Device longevity is more important than smaller size: The patient's viewpoint

AU - Wild, David M.

AU - Fisher, John Devens

AU - Kim, Soo G.

AU - Ferrick, Kevin J.

AU - Gross, Jay N.

AU - Palma, Eugen C.

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - The size of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) has been diminishing progressively. If two devices are otherwise identical in components, features and technology, the one with a larger battery should have a longer service life. Therefore, patients who receive smaller devices may require more frequent surgery to replace the devices. It is uncertain whether this tradeoff for smaller size is desired by patients. We surveyed 156 patients to determine whether patients prefer a larger, longer-lasting device, or a smaller device that is less noticeable but requires more frequent surgery. The effects of subgroups were evaluated; these included body habitus, age, gender, and patients seen at time of pulse generator replacement (PGR), initial implant, or follow-up. Among 156 patients surveyed, 151 expressed a preference. Of these, 90.1% preferred the larger device and 9.9% the smaller device (P < 0.0001). Among thin patients, 79.5% preferred a larger device. Ninety percent of males and 89.2% of females selected the larger device. Among younger patients (≤ 72 years), 89.6% preferred the larger device, as did 90.5% of older patients (> 72 years). Of patients undergoing PGR or initial implants, 95% favored the larger device, as did 86% of patients presenting for follow-up. The vast majority of patients prefer a larger device to reduce the number of potential replacement operations. This preference crosses the spectrum of those with a previously implanted device, those undergoing initial implants, those returning for routine follow-up, and patients of various ages, gender, and habitus.

AB - The size of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) has been diminishing progressively. If two devices are otherwise identical in components, features and technology, the one with a larger battery should have a longer service life. Therefore, patients who receive smaller devices may require more frequent surgery to replace the devices. It is uncertain whether this tradeoff for smaller size is desired by patients. We surveyed 156 patients to determine whether patients prefer a larger, longer-lasting device, or a smaller device that is less noticeable but requires more frequent surgery. The effects of subgroups were evaluated; these included body habitus, age, gender, and patients seen at time of pulse generator replacement (PGR), initial implant, or follow-up. Among 156 patients surveyed, 151 expressed a preference. Of these, 90.1% preferred the larger device and 9.9% the smaller device (P < 0.0001). Among thin patients, 79.5% preferred a larger device. Ninety percent of males and 89.2% of females selected the larger device. Among younger patients (≤ 72 years), 89.6% preferred the larger device, as did 90.5% of older patients (> 72 years). Of patients undergoing PGR or initial implants, 95% favored the larger device, as did 86% of patients presenting for follow-up. The vast majority of patients prefer a larger device to reduce the number of potential replacement operations. This preference crosses the spectrum of those with a previously implanted device, those undergoing initial implants, those returning for routine follow-up, and patients of various ages, gender, and habitus.

KW - ICD longevity

KW - ICD size

KW - Pacemaker longevity

KW - Pacemaker size

KW - Patient preference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9344237684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9344237684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00671.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00671.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15546308

AN - SCOPUS:9344237684

VL - 27

SP - 1526

EP - 1529

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 11

ER -